Sustainability Science

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 51–57 | Cite as

Environmental impact assessment application in infrastructural projects in Malawi

Special Feature: Original Article African regional perspectives
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The current increase in the number of development projects in Malawi is leading to loss of natural resources and the general degradation of the environment. Both the Malawi Environmental Management Act of 1996 and the Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment of 1997, prescribe a list of infrastructural projects that must undergo environmental impact assessment (EIA) before their implementation. This study identifies the key limitations of EIA application to infrastructural projects in Malawi. A desktop study used to gather information in this study involved a review of several documents such as EIA reports, policies and laws, books, journals and internet articles. Primary data was obtained from policymakers, contractors, EIA practitioners and the general public using both structured and unstructured interviews, as well as through questionnaires. Focus group discussions and direct observations were employed wherever necessary in the study. Major limitations to successful EIA in infrastructural projects in Malawi include: (1) limited experience and practice of EIA practitioners; (2) cost of EIA process; (3) limited links between EIA and urban planning procedures; (4) lack of political will; (5) project delays; (6) lack of effective monitoring and auditing, (7) lack of data, especially those to be used in predictive models. This violates the principles of sustainability science and the international best practices for EIA that were developed by the International Association for Impact Assessment. It is recommended that active environmental management should actively involve the interests of all stakeholders, and that follow up of predicted environmental impacts resulting from any project should entail monitoring, auditing and reporting.

Keywords

Environmental management Environmental impact assessment Infrastructural project Sustainability science 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barret BFD, Therivel R (1989) EIA in Japan: environmental protection versus economic growth. Land Use Policy 6(3):217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Denis R (1999) The La Grande complex physical and terrestrial environment in a reduced-flow river (under the auspices of Hydro-Quebec). Paper presented at the Environment Canada Seminar Series on follow-up in Environmental AssessmentGoogle Scholar
  3. Department of Environmental Affairs (1994) National Environmental Action Plan: the action plan, vol 1. Lilongwe, MalawiGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Environmental Affairs (1997) Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment. Lilongwe, MalawiGoogle Scholar
  5. Hung W (2007) Implementation of Environmental Impact Assessment on transport infrastructure projects in Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on traffic and transportation studies. http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=ASCECP000255040630000012000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
  6. IAIA (1999) Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, Suite C. International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, NDGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalitsi, EAK (1999) Dams and ecosystems: assessing and managing environmental impacts (Ghana’s Experience). http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=env101
  8. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kruopiene J, Zidoniene S, Dvarioniene J (2009) Current practice and shortcomings of EIA in Lithuania. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(5):305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee N, Colley R, Bonde J, Simpson J (1999) Reviewing the quality of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Appraisals. Occasional paper, No 55. EIA Centre, University of Manchester, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Lissu TA (1999) Environmental Impact Assessment of Foreign Investment Projects: a study in the Law, Policy and Governmental Decision Making in Tanzania, Unpublished paper. http://www.leat.or.tz/publications/foreign.investment
  12. Morris P, Therivel R (eds) (1995) Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment. UCL Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Mpotokwane M, Keatimilwe K (2003) Botswana summary and future focus. Southern African Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA), Windhoek, NamibiaGoogle Scholar
  14. National Economic Council (2000) Profile of the Malawi Integrated Household Survey, 1997–1998. Lilongwe, MalawiGoogle Scholar
  15. National Statistics Office (2008) Population and housing census. http://www.nso.malawi.net
  16. Onuki M, Mino T (2009) Sustainability education and new master’s degree, the master of sustainability science: the Graduate Program in Sustainability Science (GPSS) at the University of Tokyo. Sustain Sci 4:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramjeawon T, Beedasy R (2004) Evaluation of the EIA system on the Island of Mauritius and development of an environmental monitoring plan framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(5):537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramos TB, Cecilio T, de Melo JJ (2008) Environmental Impact Assessment in higher education and training in Portugal. J Clean Prod 16:639–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rossouw N, Davies S, Fortuin H, Rapholo B, De Wit M (2003) South Africa. Southern African Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA), Windhoek, NamibiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Shpyth AA (1991) The effectiveness, efficiency and fairness of environmental impact assessment in Alberta and Saskatchewan: a case study of the Oldman and Rafferty Dams. Faculty of Environmental Studies. York University, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  21. Spong P, Walmsley B (2003) Malawi. Southern African Institute for Environmental Impact Assessment (SAIEA). Windhoek, NamibiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Tarr P (2003) Environmental Assessment Capacity Building for Africa. In: Proceedings report for the annual conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Marrakech, MoroccoGoogle Scholar
  23. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (2001) Forest reserves assessment global tables: changes in forest cover 1990–2000 Tables. http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/indextables
  25. World Bank (2004) World Bank data profile tables, Malawi, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Zubair L (2001) Challenges for Environmental Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21(5):469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, United Nations University, and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and Biochemical Sciences, The PolytechnicUniversity of MalawiBlantyre 3Malawi

Personalised recommendations