What has to be learnt for sustainability? A comparison of bachelor engineering education competences at three European universities

  • J. Segalàs
  • D. Ferrer-Balas
  • M. Svanström
  • U. Lundqvist
  • K. F. Mulder
Special Feature Education for sustainable development

Abstract

In a period of harmonisation of the higher education system in Europe, a question is if also learning about sustainability at the universities is converging and what advantages this may have. This paper is an effort to present and advance the work on describing desired sustainability competences for engineering Bachelor graduates in three technical universities (Chalmers in Sweden, DUT in The Netherlands and UPC-Barcelona in Spain) using the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) descriptors. The paper also sheds light on whether there is conformity or not in desired sustainability competences (or in how sustainable development (SD) competences are handled) at the three universities. For universities outside the EHEA, this paper gives hints on the type of sustainability competences that will be required from their first-cycle graduates should they want to continue with second-cycle studies within the EHEA. The results show that the three universities follow a similar pattern in the classification of the competences (Knowledge and understanding, Skills and abilities, and Attitudes) and that there are minor divergences with respect to the list of competences and the levels of learning that Bachelor students should have when graduating. Definition of competences is an area that needs development, and this paper is part of a learning process for the three universities. This study shows that there is improvement potential for all three universities when it comes to being explicit and exact in the description of the desired SD learning.

Keywords

Sustainability Engineering Education Competences Europe 

References

  1. Bloom BS (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: the cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bologna working group on qualifications frameworks (2005) A framework for qualifications of the european higher education area. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  3. CRUE, Comité Ejecutivo del Grupo de Trabajo de Calidad Ambiental y Desarrollo Sostenible de la CRUE (2005). Directrices para la Sostenibilización Curricular. ValladolidGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferrer-Balas D (2004) Global environmental planning at the Technical University of Catalonia. Int J Sustain High Edu 5(1):48–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrer-Balas D, Barceló M. (2008) “Institutional learning process: participative design of the UPC 2015 Sustainable Plan”. In GUNI Report “Higher Education in the World”, Vol. 3 New challenges and emerging roles for human and social development. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  6. González J, Wagenaar R (2003) Tuning educational structures in Europe. Final report, BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmberg J, Svanström M, Peet D-J, Mulder K, Ferrer-Balas D, Segalàs J (2008) Embedding sustainability in higher education through interaction with lecturers: Case studies from three European technical universities. Eur J Eng Edu 33(3):271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joint quality initiative (2004). Dublin descriptors for short cycle, first cycle, second cycle and third cycle awards. (http://www.jointquality.nl/content/descriptors/CompletesetDublinDescriptors.doc)
  9. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB (1973) Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: affective domain. David McKay Co., Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Lundqvist U, Svanström M (2008) Inventory of content in basic courses in environment and sustainable development at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. Eur J Eng Edu 33(3):355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sterling S (2004) Sustainable education, re-visioning learning and change, Schumacher briefings. Green Books, BristolGoogle Scholar
  12. Svanström M, Lundqvist U, Arehag M and Holmberg J. (2008a). To address the quality of engineering education for sustainable development – experiences from Chalmers University of Technology. Proceedings to Engineering Education in Sustainable Development, Graz, Austria, September 22–24Google Scholar
  13. Svanström M, Lozano-G F, Rowe D (2008b) Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. Int J Sustain High Edu 9(3):339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weaver P, Jansen L, van Grootveld G, van Spiegel E, Vergragt P (2000) Sustainable technology development. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Segalàs
    • 1
  • D. Ferrer-Balas
    • 2
  • M. Svanström
    • 3
  • U. Lundqvist
    • 3
  • K. F. Mulder
    • 4
  1. 1.UNESCO Chair of SustainabilityTechnical University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Cities, Centre for sustainabilityTechnical University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden
  4. 4.Technology Dynamics and Sustainable DevelopmentDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations