Sustainability Science

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 45–65 | Cite as

Assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change: comparing segmentation at global and regional scales

  • Silvia Torresan
  • Andrea Critto
  • Matteo Dalla Valle
  • Nick Harvey
  • Antonio Marcomini
Special Feature: Original Article

Abstract

Recent concerns about potential climate-change effects on coastal systems require the application of vulnerability assessment tools in order to define suitable adaptation strategies and improve coastal zone management effectiveness. In fact, while various research efforts were devoted to evaluate coastal vulnerability to climate change on a national to global level, fewer applications were carried out so far to develop more comprehensive and site-specific vulnerability assessments suitable to plan possible adaptation measures at the regional scale. In this respect, specific indicators are needed to address climate-change-related issues for coastal zones and to identify vulnerable areas at the regional level. Two sets of coastal vulnerability indicators were selected, one for regional and one for global studies, respectively, concerning the same features of coastal systems, including topography and slope, geomorphological characteristics, presence and distribution of wetlands and vegetation cover, density of coastal population and number of coastal inhabitants. The proposed set of indicators for the regional scale was chosen taking into account the availability of environmental and territorial data for the whole coastal area of the Veneto region and was based on site-specific datasets characterized by a spatial resolution appropriate for a regional analysis. Moreover, a GIS-based segmentation procedure was applied to divide the coastline into linear segments, homogeneous in terms of vulnerability to climate change and sea-level rise at the regional scale. This approach allowed to divide the Veneto shoreline into 140 segments with an average length of about 1 km, while the global scale approach identified four coastal segments with an average length of about 66 km. The performed comparison indicated how the more detailed approach adopted at the regional scale is essential to understand and manage the complexities of the specific study area. In fact, the 25-m DEM employed at the regional scale provided a more accurate differentiation of the coastal area's elevation and thus of coastal susceptibility to the inundation risks, compared to the 1-km DEM used at the global level. Moreover, at the regional level the use of a 1:20,000 geomorphological map allowed to differentiate the unique landform class detected at the global level (e.g., fluvial plain) in a variety of more detailed coastal typologies (e.g., open coast eroding sandy shores backed by bedrock) characterized by a different sensitivity to climate change and sea-level rise. Accordingly, the information provided by regional indicators can support decision-makers in improving the management of coastal resources by considering the potential impacts of climate change and in the definition of appropriate actions to reduce inundation risks, to avoid the potential loss of valuable wetlands and vegetation and to plan the nourishment of sandy beaches subject to erosion processes.

Keywords

Climate change ICZM Coastal vulnerability indicators Regional scale 

References

  1. Baarse G (1995) Development of an operational tool for global vulnerability assessment (GVA)-update of the number of people at risk due to sea-level rise and increased flooding probability. CZM Centre Publication No. 3, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Hague, pp 17Google Scholar
  2. Bondesan M, Castiglioni GB, Elmi C, Gabbianelli G, Marocco R, Pirazzoli PA, Tomasin A (1995) Coastal areas at risk from storm surges and sea-level rise in northeastern Italy. J Coast Res 11(4):1354–1379Google Scholar
  3. Bondesan A, Meneghel M, Rosselli R, Vitturi A (2004) Geomorphological map of the Province of Venice, 1:50.000 (1:20.000 in digital format). LAC, Firenze (In Italian)Google Scholar
  4. Bossard M, Feranec J, Otahel J (2000) CORINE land cover technical guide—Addendum 2000. Technical report no 40, European Environmental Agency, pp 105Google Scholar
  5. Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Working paper 38, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich, UK, pp 20Google Scholar
  6. Denzer R (2005) Generic integration of environmental decision support systems—state-of-the-art. Environm Modell Softw 20:1217–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DINAS-COAST Consortium (2006) DIVA 1.5.5. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  8. ENEA (2003). Soft coastal barriers: artificial nourishment, “Global climate” Special project, pp 55 (In Italian)Google Scholar
  9. Eprim Y, Di Donato M, Cecconi G (2005) Gates strategies and storm surge forecasting system developed for the Venice flood management. In: Fletcher CA, Spencer T (eds) Flooding and environmental challenges for Venice and its lagoon: state of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 257–265Google Scholar
  10. ESRI (2005) ArcGIS Desktop Help. Release 9.1. Last modified 2 May 2005. Available at http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.1/
  11. Ferla M, Cordella M, Michielli L, Rusconi A (2007) Long term variations on sea level and tidal regime in the lagoon of Venice. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 75(1–2):214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fletcher CA, Spencer T (2005) Flooding and environmental challenges for Venice and its lagoon: state of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 691Google Scholar
  13. Fontolan G (2001) Risk of flooding: forecast and prevention plan. Province of Venice—Soil and Civil Defence Unit, Trieste, pp 92Google Scholar
  14. Füssel HM (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Change 17:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambolati G, Teatini P (2002) GIS simulations of the inundation risk in the Coastal Lowlands of the Northern Adriatic Sea. Math Comput Modell 35:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonella M, Teatini P, Tomasi L, Gambolati G (1998) Flood risk analysis in the Upper Adriatic Sea due to storm surge, tide, waves, and natural and anthropic land subsidence. In: Gambolati G (ed) CENAS—Coastline evolution of the upper Adriatic Sea due to sea level rise and natural and anthropogenic land subsidence, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 313–324Google Scholar
  17. Hinkel J, Klein RJT (2007) Integrating knowledge for assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change. In: Mc Fadden L, Nicholls RJ, Penning-Rowsell E (eds) Managing coastal vulnerability, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 61–77Google Scholar
  18. Hoozemans FMJ, Marchand M, Pennekamp HA (1993) Sea level rise: a global vulnerability assessment—vulnerability assessments for population, Coastal Wetlands and rice production on a global scale, 2nd revised edn, Delft Hydraulics and Rijkswaterstaat, Delft, pp 184Google Scholar
  19. IPCC CZMS (1992) Global climate change and the rising challenge of the sea. Report of the Coastal Zone Management Subgroup Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Response Strategies Working Group. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United States Natural, Oceanic and Atmospheric Adiministration, United States Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: McCarthy J, Canziani O, Leary N, Dokken D, White K (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organisation and United Nations Environment Programme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1032Google Scholar
  21. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, pp 23Google Scholar
  22. Mc Fadden L, Vafeidis A, Nicholls RJ (2003) A coastal database for global impact and vulnerability analysis. In: Proceedings of 5th international symposium on coastal engineering and science of coastal sediment processes: coastal sediments ‘03, 18–23 May 2003, Clearwater Beach, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Mc Fadden L, Nicholls RJ, Penning-Roswell E (2007a) Managing coastal vulnerability. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 261Google Scholar
  24. Mc Fadden L, Nicholls RJ, Vafeidis AT, Tol RSJ (2007b) A methodology for modelling coastal space for global assessment. J Coast Res 23(4):911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McFadden L, Spencer T, Nicholls RJ (2007c) Broad-scale modelling of coastal wetlands: what is required? Hydrobiologia 577:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGill JT (1958) Map of coastal landforms of the world. Geogr Rev 48:402–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mysiak J, Gipponi C, Rosato P (2005) Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management. Environ Modell Softw 20:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NGDC (2001) ETOPO2 Global 2’ Elevations, National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC), September 2001, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicholls RJ (2002) Analysis of global impacts of sea level rise: a case study of flooding. Phys Chemis Earth. Parts A/B/C 27(32–34):1455–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nicholls RJ, Mimura N (1998) Regional issues raised by sea-level rise and their policy implications. Climate Res 11:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicholls RJ, Klein RJT, Tol RSJ (2007) Managing coastal vulnerability and climate change: a national to global perspective. In: Mc Fadden L, Nicholls RJ, Penning-Rowsell E (eds) Managing coastal vulnerability, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 223–241Google Scholar
  32. Pirazzoli PA (1991) Possible defences against a sea-level rise in the Venice area, Italy. J Coastal Res 7:231–248Google Scholar
  33. Regione Veneto (2005a) Administrative boundaries for the Venice Province, Urban Planning Unit. Available at http://www.regione.veneto.it/Ambiente+e+Territorio/Territorio/Cartografia+Regionale/Area+SIT/Banche+dati+territoriali.htm#limitiammvi, (In Italian)
  34. Regione Veneto (2005b) Administrative boundaries for the Rovigo Province, Urban Planning Unit. Available at http://www.regione.veneto.it/Ambiente+e+Territorio/Territorio/Cartografia+Regionale/Area+SIT/Banche+dati+territoriali.htm#limitiammvi, (In Italian)
  35. Regione Veneto (2006) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for the Veneto Region, Urban Planning Unit. Available at http://www.regione.veneto.it/Ambiente+e+Territorio/Territorio/Cartografia+Regionale/Area+SIT/Banche+dati+territoriali.htm#limitiammvi (In Italian)
  36. Seminara G, Bolla Pittaluga M, Tambroni N, Garotta V (2005) Open problems in modelling the long-term morphodynamic evolution of the Venice Lagoon. In: Fletcher CA, Spencer T (eds) Flooding and environmental challenges for Venice and its Lagoon: state of knowledge, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 369–378Google Scholar
  37. Sharples C (2006) Indicative mapping of Tasmanian Coastal vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise: explanatory report, 2nd edn. Department of Primary Industries, Water & Environment, Tasmania, pp 112Google Scholar
  38. Shim JP, Warkentin M, Courtney JF, Power DJ, Sharda R, Carlsson C (2002) Past, present and future of decision support technology. Decis Supp Syst 33:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simeoni U, Fontolan G, Tessari U, Corbau C (2007) Domains of spit evolution in the Goro area, Po Delta, Italy Geomorphology 86:332–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterr H, Klein R, Reese S (1999) Climate change and coastal zones: an overview of the state-of-the-art on regional and local vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the international workshop climate change and Mediterranean Coastal Systems: regional scenarios and vulnerability assessment, 9–10 December 1999, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Venice, Italy, pp 24Google Scholar
  41. Torresan S, Critto A, Dalla Valle M, Harvey N, Marcomini A (2007) A regional risk assessment framework for climate change impacts evaluation in a coastal zone management perspective. In: Özhan E (ed) Proceedings of the eighth international conference on the Mediterranean Coastal environment, Alexandria, Egypt, vol 2. MEDCOAST, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, pp 741–752Google Scholar
  42. Vafeidis AT, Nicholls RJ, Boot G, Cox J, Grashoff PS, Hinkel J, Maatens R, McFadden L, Spencer T, Tol RSJ (2008) A new global coastal database for impact and vulnerability analysis to sea-level rise. J Coast Res (in press)Google Scholar
  43. Vafeidis AT, Nicholls RJ, McFadden L, Hinkel J, Grashoff PS (2004) Developing a Global Database for coastal vulnerability analysis: design issues and challenges. In: Altan MO (ed) The international archives of photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol 35(B), pp 801–805Google Scholar
  44. Valentin H (1952) Coasts of the World. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, pp 246 (in German)Google Scholar
  45. Veneto Po Delta Regional Park Autority (2002) Geologic and Geomorphological Map of the Delta Po Park at scale 1:50.000 (In Italian) Google Scholar
  46. Voice M, N Harvey, Walsh K (2006) Vulnerability to climate change of Australia’s Coastal Zone: analysis of gaps in methods. Data and system thresholds. Report to the Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, pp 120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Torresan
    • 1
  • Andrea Critto
    • 1
    • 2
  • Matteo Dalla Valle
    • 1
  • Nick Harvey
    • 3
  • Antonio Marcomini
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Euro-Mediterranean Centre for Climate Change (CMCC), c/o Consorzio Venezia RicercheMarghera-VeniceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity Ca’ Foscari of VeniceVeniceItaly
  3. 3.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity Ca’ Foscari of VeniceVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations