Sustainability Science

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 77–84 | Cite as

Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective

Overview Article

Abstract

Sustainability science is emerging as a transdisciplinary effort to come to grips with the much-needed symbiosis between human activity and the environment. While there is recognition that conventional economic growth must yield to policies that foster sustainable development, this has not yet occurred on any broad scale. Rather, there is clear evidence that the Earth’s ecosystems and landscapes continue to degrade as a consequence of the cumulative impact of human activities. Taking an ecohealth approach to sustainability science provides a unique perspective on both the goals and the means to achieve sustainability. The goals should be the restoration of full functionality to the Earth’s ecosystems and landscapes, as measured by the key indicators of health: resilience, organization, vitality (productivity), and the absence of ecosystem distress syndrome. The means should be the coordinated (spatially and temporally) efforts to modify human behaviors to reduce cumulative stress impacts. Achieving ecosystem health should become the cornerstone of sustainability policy—for healthy ecosystems are the essential precondition for achieving sustainable livelihoods, human health, and many other societal objectives, as reflected in the Millennium Development Goals.

Keywords

Ecosystem health Sustainability science Transdisciplinarity Ecosystem distress syndrome Ecological indicators Human activity and the environment 

References

  1. Bertram P, Shear H, Stadler-Salt N, Horvatin P (2003) Environmental and socioeconomic indicators of Great Lakes basin ecosystem health. In: Rapport DJ, Lasley W, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds) Managing for healthy ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 703–720Google Scholar
  2. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059–8061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooney R, Dickson B (eds) (2005) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle: risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. Earthscan, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Naeem S, Limburg K, Paruelo J, O’Neill RV, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(15):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crowder LB, Osherenko G, Young OR, Airame S, Norse EA, Baron N, Day JD, Douvere F, Ehler CN, Halpern BS, Langdon SJ, McLeod KL, Ogden JC, Peach RE, Rosenberg AA, Wilson JA (2006) Sustainability. Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 313(5787):617–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein PR, Rapport DJ (1996) Changing coastal marine environments and human health. Ecosyst Health 2(3):166–176Google Scholar
  7. Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gawler M, Cripps S, Drijver C, Jorge M, Morris B (eds) (2000) CoralWeb. Coral reef ecoregions in action, 2000–2005: framework document. WWF Action Network, Zeist, The Netherlands. Available online at http://www.artemis-services.com/downloads/coralweb.pdf
  9. Haskell BD, Norton BG, Costanza R (1992) What is ecosystem health and why should we worry about it? In: Costanza R, Norton BG, Haskll BD (eds) Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 269Google Scholar
  10. Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (eds) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B 3rd, O’Riordan T, Svedlin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Leopold A (1941) Wilderness as a land laboratory. Living Wilderness 6:3Google Scholar
  14. Leopold A, Callicott JB, Freyfogle ET (eds) (1999) For the health of the land. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Levins R, Awerbuch T, Brinkmann U, Eckardt I, Epstein P, Makhoul N, Albuquerque de Possas C, Spielman A, Wilson ME (1994) The emergence of new diseases. Am Sci 82(1):52–60Google Scholar
  16. Mageau MT, Costanza R, Ulanowicz RE (1995) The development and initial testing of a quantitative assessment of ecosystem health. Ecosyst Health 1(4):201–213Google Scholar
  17. McMichael AJ (1993) Planetary overload: global environmental change and the health of the human species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. McMichael AJ (1997) Global environmental change and human health: impact assessment, population vulnerability, research priorities. Ecosyst Health 3(4):200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens III WW (1972) The limits to growth. A report to the club of Rome, Hamburg, Germany. Available online at http://www.clubofrome.org/docs/limits.rtf
  20. Maffi L (ed) (2001) On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Rapport DJ (1983) The stress–response environmental statistical system and its applicability to the Laurentian Lower Great Lakes. Stat J United Nations ECE 1(4):377-405Google Scholar
  22. Rapport DJ (1989a) What constitutes ecosystem health? Perspect Biol Med 33(1):120–132Google Scholar
  23. Rapport DJ (1989b) Symptoms of pathology in the Gulf of Bothnia (Baltic Sea): ecosystem response to stress from human activity. Biol J Linnean Soc 37(1–2):33-49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rapport DJ (1995) Ecosystem services and management options as blanket indicators of ecosystem health. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 4(2):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rapport DJ, Mergler D (2004) Expanding the practice of ecosystem health. Ecohealth 1(Suppl 2):4–7Google Scholar
  26. Rapport DJ, Singh A (2006) An ecohealth-based framework for state of environment reporting. Ecol Indicators 6:409–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rapport DJ, Whitford WG (1999) How ecosystems respond to stress: common properties of arid and aquatic systems. Bioscience 49(3):193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rapport DJ, Thorpe C, Regier HA (1979) Ecosystem medicine. Bull Ecolog Soc Am 60:180–182Google Scholar
  29. Rapport DJ, Regier HA, Hutchinson TC (1985) Ecosystem behavior under stress. Am Nat 125(5):617–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichael A (1998) Assessing ecosystem health: challenges at the interface of social, natural, and health sciences. Trends Ecol Evol 13(10):397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rapport DJ, Lasley W, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds) (2003) Managing for healthy ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  32. Ullsten O (2003) The politics of the environment. In: Rapport DJ, Lasley W, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds) Managing for healthy ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 11–14 Google Scholar
  33. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) Global environment outlook 3: past, present and future perspectives. Earthscan, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 227(5325):494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitford WG (2002) Ecology of desert systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitford WG, Rapport DJ, deSoyza AG (1999) Using resistance and resilience measurements for “fitness” tests in ecosystem health. J Environ Manage 57(1):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science and Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Applied EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenyangChina
  2. 2.Ecohealth ConsultingSalt Spring IslandCanada

Personalised recommendations