Beginning teachers’ transition from pre-service education to working life

Theoretical perspectives and best practices
Schwerpunkt

Abstract

This review article examines new teachers’ transition from education to work on the basis of recent studies on transition, workplace learning and induction to work. The following challenges of transition are addressed: (1) threat of unemployment, (2) inadequate knowledge and skills, (3) decreased self-efficacy and increased stress, (4) early attrition, (5) newcomers’ role and position in a work community, and (6) importance of learning at work. Workplace learning research is dealt with from the following viewpoints: (1) how do people learn at work? (2) the role of work communities and organization in learning (3) the trends of formalization and informalization of learning and (4) the methods used to promote the professional development of young teachers, emphasis being on peer group mentoring. Our general conclusion is that learning and professional development of teachers should be seen as a continuing process combining formal, non-formal and informal learning throughout the career from initial training to retirement. The best way to support new teachers is informed by a profound study of the practice architectures of the educational system as a whole.

Keywords

Beginning teachers Mentoring Novice teachers Teacher induction Transition from education to work Workplace learning 

Der Übergang von Lehrkräften von der vorbereitenden Ausbildung zum Arbeitsalltag

Theoretische Perspektiven und mustergültige Praxis

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Überblicksartikel untersucht anhand von vorliegenden Studien den Übergang von Junglehrerinnen und -lehrern vom Studium über die Einführung in den Vorbereitungsdienst bis hin zum Lernen am Arbeitsplatz. Die folgenden Herausforderungen sind zu benennen: 1) die Gefahr der Arbeitslosigkeit; 2) inadäquate Kenntnisse und Fähigkeiten; 3) abnehmende Selbstwirksamkeit und zunehmender Stress; 4) frühe Abnutzungserscheinungen; 5) die Rolle des Neulings und dessen Position im Kollegium sowie 6) die Wichtigkeit des Lernens während der Arbeit. Die Forschung zum Lernen am Arbeitsplatz beschäftigt sich mit folgenden Aspekten: 1) Wie lernen Menschen am Arbeitsplatz? 2) die Rolle der Arbeitsgruppen und der Organisation des Lernens; 3) die Trends von Formalisierung und Informalisierung des Lernens und 4) die verwendeten Methoden, um die professionelle Entwicklung junger Lehrerinnen und Lehrer zu fördern, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf der Beratung/Betreuung durch Peers liegt. Unsere Kernaussage besteht darin, dass das Lernen und die professionelle Entwicklung von Lehrkräften als ein kontinuierlicher Prozess begriffen werden sollte, der formales, non-formales und informelles Lernen während der gesamten Berufslaufbahn kombiniert, und zwar von den ersten Übungen bis zum Ausscheiden aus dem Beruf. Der beste Weg, junge Lehrkräfte zu unterstützen, besteht darin, sich profund über die bestehenden Praxismodelle in den Bildungssystemen zu informieren.

Schlüsselwörter

Junglehrer Mentor Referendare Lehrerbildung Übergang von der Ausbildung zum Beruf Lernen am Arbeitsplatz 

References

  1. Alhija, F., & Fresko, B. (2010). Socialization of new teachers: Does induction matter? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1592–1597.Google Scholar
  2. Almiala, M. (2008). Mieli paloi muualle – opettajan työuran muutos ja ammatillisen identiteetin rakentuminen. Joensuu: University of Joensuu (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  3. Angelique, H., Kyle, K., & Taylor, E. (2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 195–209.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Ashton, D. (2002). The dynamic of workplace learning: The role of work organizations. In K. Evans, P. Hodkinson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Working to learn (pp. 149–162). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  6. Aspfors, J., Fransson, G., & Heikkinen, H. (2011, accepted to be published). Mentoring as dialogue, collaboration and/or assessment? In P. Tynjälä, M.-L. Stenström, & M. Saarnivaara (Eds.), Transitions and transformations in education and learning. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463–482.Google Scholar
  9. Bickmore, D., & Bickmore, S. (2010). A multifaceted approach to teacher induction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1006–1014.Google Scholar
  10. Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–483.Google Scholar
  11. Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Billett, S. (2008). Learning through work: Exploring instances of relational interdependencies. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 232–240.Google Scholar
  13. Bokeno, R. M., & Vernon, W. G. (2000). Dialogic mentoring. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 237–270.Google Scholar
  14. Chaliès, S., Bertone, S., Flavier, E., & Durand, M. (2008). Effects of collaborative mentoring on the articulation of training and classroom situations: A case study in the French school system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 550–563.Google Scholar
  15. Cochran-Smith, M., & Power, C. (2010). New directions for teacher preparation. Educational Leadership, 30(3), 6–13.Google Scholar
  16. Collin, K. (2005). Experience and shared practice. Design engineers learning at work. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, J. A., & Fauser, C. J. M. (2004). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update 11(2). http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/content/11/2/103.full. Last Accessed 10 January 2011.Google Scholar
  18. Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.-J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Ivory tower to concrete jungle revisited. Journal of Education and Work, 17(1), 47–70.Google Scholar
  19. Cross, S. (1998). Roots and wings: Mentoring. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35, 224–230.Google Scholar
  20. Deussen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. (2007). “Coach” can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in Reading First. Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Department of Education. Issues & Answers, REL 2007–005. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=47. Last Accessed 10 January 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Devos, A. (2010). New teachers, mentoring and the discursive formation of professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1219–1223.Google Scholar
  22. Engeström, Y. (2004). The new generation of expertise. Seven theses. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 145–165). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Eraut, M. (2004a). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–173.Google Scholar
  24. Eraut, M. (2004b). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201–221). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission. (2001). Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality. Communication from the Commission. COM (2001) 678 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission. (2007). Improving the quality of teacher education. Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/education/com392_en.pdf. Last Accessed 10 January 2011.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission (2010). Developing coherent and system-wide induction programmes for beginning teachers: A handbook for policymakers. European Commission Staff Working Document SEC (2010) 538 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  28. Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: the case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405.Google Scholar
  30. Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez, A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout and support during the student-teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 916–934.Google Scholar
  31. Fransson, G., & Gustafsson, C. (Eds.). (2008). Newly qualified teachers in Northern Europe. comparative perspectives on promoting professional development. Teacher Education: Research Publications no 4. Gävle: Gävle University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments. Integrating organizational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. Teachers work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  36. Harris, D. N., & Adams, S. (2007). Understanding the level and causes of teacher turnover: A comparison with other professions. Economics of Education Review, 26, 325–337.Google Scholar
  37. Harris, M., Chisholm, C., & Allan, M. (2010). Lifeplace learning for effective professsional development in industry and business. Industry and Higher Education, 24(2), 135–141.Google Scholar
  38. Harteis, C., Bauer, J., & Gruber, H. (2008). The culture of learning from mistakes: How employees handle mistakes in everyday work. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 223–231.Google Scholar
  39. Hedegaard, E. (2008). Development of networking and networks. In G. Fransson & C. Gustafsson (Eds.), Newly qualified teachers in Northern Europe. Comparative perspectives on promoting professional development (Research Publication 4, pp. 148–166). Gävle: University of Gävle. Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  40. Heikkinen, H. L. T., Jokinen, H., & Tynjälä, P. (2008). Reconceptualising mentoring as a dialogue. In G. Fransson & C. Gustafsson (Eds.), Newly Qualified Teachers in Northern Europe. Comparative perspectives on promoting professional development (Research publication 4, pp. 107–124). Gävle: University of Gävle. Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  41. Heikkinen, H. L. T., Jokinen, H., & Tynjälä, P. (Eds.). (2010). VERME. Vertaisryhmämentorointi työssä oppimisen tukena [Supporting learning at work through Peer Group Mentoring]. Helsinki:Tammi Publishers (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  42. Henke, R. R., Zahn, L., & Carroll, C. D. (2001). Attrition of new teachers among recent college graduates: Comparing occupational stability among 1992–93 graduates who taught and those who worked in other occupations. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  43. Hofman, R. H., & Dijkstra, B. J. (2010). Effective teacher professionalization in networks? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1031–1040.Google Scholar
  44. Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1530–1543.Google Scholar
  45. Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 287–297.Google Scholar
  46. Huber, C. (2010). Professional Learning 2.0. Educational Leadership, 31(3), 41–46.Google Scholar
  47. Ingersoll, R. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? A report co-sponsored by the center for the study of teaching and policy and the center for policy research in education. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
  48. Ingersoll, R., & Smith, T. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40.Google Scholar
  49. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2009). Get a vocation: keeping on top of studies. Reducing the drop-out rate in vocational upper secondary education and training. European Journal of Vocational Training, 47(2), 28–49.Google Scholar
  50. Jäppinen, A.-K. (2010). Preventing early leaving in VET: Distributed pedagogical leadership in characterising five types of successful organizations. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(3), 297–312.Google Scholar
  51. Jokinen, H., Moberg, Å., Poom-Valickis, K., & Rohtma, V. (2008). Mentoring newly qualified teachers in Estonia, Finland, and Sweden. In G. Fransson & C. Gustafsson (Eds.), Newly qualified teachers in Northern Europe (Research Publication 4, pp. 76–106). Gävle: University of Gävle, Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  52. Jones, M. (2006). The balancing act of mentoring: Mediating between newcomers and communities of practice. In C. Cullingford (Ed.), Mentoring in Education: An international Perspective (pp. 57–86). Abingdon: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  53. Kealy, M. V. (2010). A leadership focus on teacher effectiveness: Support for novice teachers. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 23(1), 52–54.Google Scholar
  54. Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling practice. Challenges for education (pp. 24–38). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  55. Kemmis, S., Hardy, I, Wilkinson, J., & Edwards-Groves, L. C. (2010). On being “stirred” into practice. An unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  56. Keogh, J., Garvis, S., & Pendergast, D. (2010). Plugging the leaky pucket: The need to develop resilience in novice middle years teachers. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 8(2), 17–26.Google Scholar
  57. Kim, K., Collins, H., Hagedorn, M., Williamson, J., & Chapman, C. (2004). Participation in adult education and lifelong learning. U.S. Department of education, National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  58. Knapp, M. L. (2003). Professional development as policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27(1), 109–157.Google Scholar
  59. Kutilek, L., & Earnest, G. (2001). Supporting professional growth through mentoring and coaching. Journal of Extension, 39, 334–346.Google Scholar
  60. Lambson, D. (2010). Novice teachers learning through participation in a teacher study group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1660–1668.Google Scholar
  61. Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. C. Sognel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Le Cornu, R. (2005). Peer mentoring: engaging pre-service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13, 355–366.Google Scholar
  63. Lewis, T. (2010). Best Countries in the World. www.newsweek.com/feature/2010/the-world-s-best-countries.html (Download: 30.9.2010).Google Scholar
  64. Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. (2002). From network learning to classroom teaching. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 315–337.Google Scholar
  65. Linnakylä, P. (2004). Finland. In H. Döbert, E. Klieme, & W. Stroka (Eds.), Conditions of school performance in seven countries. A quest for understanding the international variation of PISA results (pp. 150–218). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  66. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.Google Scholar
  67. Livanos, I. (2010). The relationship between higher education and labour market in Greece: the weakest link? Higher Education, 60, 473–489.Google Scholar
  68. Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Marvel, J., Lyter, D. M., Peltola, P., Stirizek, G. A., & Morton, B. A. (2007). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004–2005 teacher follow-up survey. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  70. Maynard, T. (2001). The student teacher and the school community of practice: a consideration of ‘learning as participation’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
  71. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Merriam, S., Caffarella, R., & Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Miles, R. E., Miles, G., & Snow, C. C. (2005). Collaborative entrepreneurship. How communities of networked firms use continuous innovation to create economic wealth. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  74. Moreau, M., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Graduates employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19(4), 305–324.Google Scholar
  75. Murtonen, M., Olkinuora, E., Tynjälä, P., & Lehtinen, E. (2008). “Do I need research skills in working life?”: University students’ motivation and difficulties in quantitative methods courses. Higher Education, 56(5), 599–612.Google Scholar
  76. Musanti, S. (2004). Balancing mentoring and collaboration. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6, 13–23.Google Scholar
  77. Nasser-Abu Alhija, F., & Fresko, B. (2010). Socialization of new teachers: Does induction matter? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1592–1597.Google Scholar
  78. Newman, F., & Wehlage, G. (1997). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the center on organization and restructuring of schools. Madison: Document Service, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.Google Scholar
  79. Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together—Primary science student teachers’ and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1309–1318.Google Scholar
  80. OECD. (2000) From initial education to working life. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  81. OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  82. Pang, M. (2006). The use of learning study to enhance teacher professional learning in Hong Kong. Teaching Education, 17(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
  83. Perez, M., Anand, P., Speroni, C., Parrish, T., Esra, P., Socias, M., & Gubbins, P. (2007). Success of California schools in the context of educational adequacy. American Institutes for Research. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED499199.pdf. Last Accessed 10 January 2011.Google Scholar
  84. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571.Google Scholar
  85. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2008). A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 56, 29–43.Google Scholar
  86. Roberts, A. (2000). Mentoring revisited: a phenomenological reading of the literature. Mentoring & Tutoring, 8, 145–169.Google Scholar
  87. Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Devos, G., & Vlerick, P. (2010). Teacher education and the choice to enter the teaching profession: A prospective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1619–1629.Google Scholar
  88. Sahlberg, P. (2010). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 323–348). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  89. Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., & Brooks, J. (2009) Becoming a member of a school community while working toward science education reform: Teacher induction from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) perspective. Science Education, 93, 996–1025.Google Scholar
  90. Salo, P., & Johnson, P. (2008). Action research revealing paradoxes and tensions of education reforms. Lessons learned in Finland. In E. Furu, P. Salo, & K. Rönneman (Eds.), Nurturing praxis. Action research in partnership between school and university in a Nordic light (pp. 3–10). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  91. Sambrook, S. (2006). Developing a model of factors influencing work-related learning: Findings from two research projects. In J. N. Streumer (Ed.), Work-related learning (pp. 95–125). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  92. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Scheopner, A. J. (2010). Irreconcilable differences: Teacher attrition in public and catholic schools. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 261–277.Google Scholar
  94. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.Google Scholar
  95. Shoval, E., Erlich, I., & Feijgin, N. (2010). Mapping and interpreting novice physical education teachers’ self-perceptions of strenghs and difficulties. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
  96. Siivonen, P. (2010). From a “student” to a lifelong “consumer” of education? Constructions of educatibility in adult students’ narrative life histories. Jyväskylä: FERA.Google Scholar
  97. Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.Google Scholar
  98. Stenström, M.-L. (2006). Polytechnic graduates working life skills and expertise. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 89–102). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  99. Sveiby, K.-S., & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work—An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420–433.Google Scholar
  100. Teichler, U. (2007). Does higher education matter? Lessons from a comparative graduate survey. European Journal of Education, 42(1), 11–34.Google Scholar
  101. The Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany. (2008). http://www.kmk.org/dokumentation/das-bildungswesen-in-der-bundesrepublik-deutschland/dossier-englisch/publikation-zum-download.html. Last Accessed 10 January 2011.Google Scholar
  102. Thomas, C., & Lankau, M. (2009). Preventing burnout: The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Human Resource Management, 48(3), 417–432.Google Scholar
  103. Tuschling, A., & Engemann, C. (2006). From education to lifelong learning: The emerging regime of learning in the European Union. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 451–469.Google Scholar
  104. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130–154.Google Scholar
  105. Tynjälä, P., & Kallio, E. (2009). Integrative pedagogy for developing professional expertise in higher education. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, EARLI, 25–29, April, 2009, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  106. Tynjälä, P., Slotte, V., Nieminen, J., Lonka, K., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). From university to working life: Graduates’ workplace skills in practice. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 73–88). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  107. Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H., & Kiviniemi, U. (2009). Integratiivinen pedagogiikka opetusharjoittelussa. (Integrative pedagogy in teacher training). Accepted to be published in Kasvatus – Finnish Journal of Education (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  108. Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Littleton, K. (2008). Teachers’ professional identity negotiations in two different work organisations. Vocations and Learning, 1(2), 131–148.Google Scholar
  109. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143–178.Google Scholar
  110. Vonk, J. H. C. (1995). Conceptualising novice teachers’ professional development: A base of supervisory intervention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 18–22, April, San Fransisco, CA.Google Scholar
  111. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Wang, J., & Odell, S. (2007). An alternative conception of mentor/novice relationships: Learning to teach reform-minded teaching as a context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 473–489.Google Scholar
  113. Webb, E. (2007). Recognition and validation of nonformal and informal learning of VET teachers and trainers in the EU member states. European centre for the development of vocational training (CEDEFOP). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  114. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammon, L. Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. A status report on teacher development in the U.S. and abroad. Technical report. Dallas: National Staff Development Council.Google Scholar
  115. West, L., & Staub, F. C. (2003). Content-focused coaching: transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  116. Williams, A. (2003). Informal learning in the workplace: a case study of new teachers. Educational Studies, 29(2/3), 207–219.Google Scholar
  117. Wong, H. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 88(638), 41–58.Google Scholar
  118. Woolbers, M. H. (2000). The effects of level of education and mobility bet on employment and unemployment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 16(2), 185–200.Google Scholar
  119. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finnish Institute for Educational ResearchUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskylän YliopistoFinnland

Personalised recommendations