Publizistik

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 259–276 | Cite as

Der mediatisierte Lebenswandel

Permanently online, permanently connected
Essay

Literatur

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Deci, R. M., & Ryan, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deresiewicz, W. (2009). The end of solitude. The Chronicle Review. http://chronicle.com/article/The-End-of-Solitude/3708. Zugegriffen: 19. März 2015.
  4. Döbler, T. (2014). Das Ende der Verbindlichkeit? Veränderungen sozialer Beziehungen durch mobiles Kommunikationsverhalten. In J. Wimmer & M. Hartmann (Hrsg.), Medienkommunikation in Bewegung. Mobilisierung – Mobile Medien – Kommunikative Mobilität (S. 139–154). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  5. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Hasebrink, U., & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices. A multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations, 9, 757–779.Google Scholar
  7. Hefner, D. (2012). Alltagsgespräche über Nachrichten. Medienrezeption, politische Expertise und die wissensbildende Qualität von Anschlusskommunikation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  8. Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38, 54–69. doi:10.1177/0093650210378229 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, V. (2014). Gemeinsam einsam: Phänomen Phubbing. Untersuchungen zur unangebrachten Smartphone-Nutzung im privaten und öffentlichen Miteinander. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, 65(6), 335–340.Google Scholar
  10. Knobloch, S., & Zillmann, D. (2002). Mood management via the digital jukebox. Journal of Communication, 52, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krämer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meares, R., & Orlay, W. (1988). On self‐boundary: A study of the development of the concept of secrecy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. (2014). Jugend, Information, Multimedia (JIM-Studie) 2014. Stuttgart: MPFS.Google Scholar
  15. Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Page, R. (2010). Re-examining narrativity: Small stories in status updates. Text & Talk, 30, 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schultz, N. (2015). Computer und Gehirn: Der Mythos von der digitalen Demenz. Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/computer-und-gehirn-der-mythos-von-der-digitalen-demenz-a-1008229.html. Zugegriffen: 17. Feb. 2015.
  18. Sonnentag, S., & Bayer, U.-V. (2005). Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thatcher, A., Wretschko, G., & Fridjhon, P. (2008). Online flow experiences, problematic Internet use and Internet procrastination. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2236–2254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1102–1112. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.002 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35, 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vorderer, P., & Kohring, M. (2013). Permanently online: A challenge for media and communication research. International Journal of Communication, 7, Feature, 188–196.Google Scholar
  24. Vorderer, P., & Schneider, F. (in Druck). Social media and ostracism. In K. D. Williams & S. A. Nida (Hrsg.), Social exclusion. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The „myth“ of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ziegele, M., Breiner, T., & Quiring, O. (2014). What creates interactivity in online news discussions? An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on news items. Journal of Communication, 64, 1111–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Medien- und KommunikationswissenschaftUniversität MannheimMannheimDeutschland

Personalised recommendations