Skip to main content
Log in

Supervision von Coaching

Supervision of coaching

  • Diskurs
  • Published:
Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In dem Maße, in dem Coaching sich als Beratungsformat für Fach- und Führungskräfte etabliert, wird die Forderung nach Professionalisierung und Qualitätssicherung lauter. Ein solches Instrument dafür ist Supervision. Die Autorin definiert den Begriff „Supervision von Coaching“ und beschreibt deren Funktionen und Wirkungen. Zur Veranschaulichung wird das „siebenäugige“ Modell der Supervision von Coaching erläutert. Schließlich wird auf die Verbreitung und Inanspruchnahme von Supervision durch Coaches eingegangen. Der Beitrag endet mit einer kurzen zusammenfassenden Darstellung der Publikationslandschaft zu Supervision von Coaching und einem Ausblick für die Forschung.

Abstract

To the extent that coaching establishes itself as a consulting format for professionals, professionalization and quality assurance of coaching become increasingly relevant. One instrument towards professionalization and quality assurance is coaching supervision. The author defines coaching supervision and describes its various functions. The “seven-eyed” model of supervision is explained. Next, the question to what degree coaches actually take part in supervision is addressed by summarizing extant empirical studies. The article ends by describing characteristics of the publication scene on coaching supervision and by providing an outlook for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Notes

  1. Für die – teils kontrovers geführte – Diskussion zu Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschieden sei auf die umfangreiche Literatur verwiesen (z. B. Kühl 2008; Schreyögg 2003).

Literatur

  • Auckenthaler, A. (1999). Supervision psychotherapeutischer Praxis. Stuttgart: Kolhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H., & Geddes, M. (2009). Developing coaching supervision practice: an Australian case study. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 7, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachkirova, T. (2008). Coaching supervision: reflection on changes and challenges. People and Organisations at Work, 2008, 17. Autumn Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachkirova, T., Jackson, P., & Clutterbuck, D. (Hrsg.). (2011). Coaching and mentoring supervision: theory and practice. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belardi, N. (1994). Supervision. Von der Praxisberatung zur Organisationsentwicklung. Paderborn: Junfermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butwell, J. (2006). Group supervision for coaches: Is it worthwhile? A study of the process in a major professional organisation. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., Webb, C., Bostock, L., & Coomber, C. (2012). Effective supervision in social work and social care. Research Briefing. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. (2006). Key issues in coaching psychology supervision. The Coaching Psychologist, 2(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBVC (Hrsg.). (2012). Leitlienien und Empfehlungen für die Entwicklung von Coaching als Profession. 4. Osnabrück: DBVC Geschäftsstelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, E. (2012). Supervision in action: a relational approach to coaching and consulting supervision. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, E., & Regouin, W. (2017). Being supervised: a guide for supervisees. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diermann, I., Müller, A., Eigl, M., Möller, H., & Kotte, S. (in Vorber.). Supervision zur Reflexion und Qualitätssicherung im Coaching? Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Supervision von Business Coaches.

  • Donaldson-Feilder, E., & Bush, K. (2009). Achieving effective supervision for coaching psychologists: exploring a peer supervision/reflective. The Coaching Psychologist, 5, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag-Becker, E., Grohs-Schulz, M., & Neumann-Wirsig, H. (Hrsg.). (2017). Lehrsupervision im Fokus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2012). Australian coaches’ views on coaching supervision: a study with implications for Australian coach education, training and practice. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 10, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graßmann, C., & Schermuly, C.C. (in Vorber.). Side effects contagion: The role of supervision and neuroticism.

  • Gray, D., & Jackson, P. (2011). Coaching supervision in the historical context of psychotherapeutic and counselling models: a meta-model. In T. Bachkirova, P. Jackson & D. Clutterbuck (Hrsg.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: theory and practice (S. 15–27). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P. (2010). Coaching supervision. In J. Passmore (Hrsg.), Excellence in coaching: the industry guide (S. 215–225). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Schwenk, G. (2006). Coaching supervision: a paper prepared for the CIPD coaching conference. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (1989). Supervision in the helping professions. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: supervision and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2013). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: supervision and development (2. Aufl.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Turner, E. (2017). The rise of coaching supervision 2006–2014. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice doi:10.1080/17521882.2016.1266002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (2016). A review of research into business coaching supervision. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 9(2), 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. (1992). What’s wrong, what’s right with social work supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 10(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koortzen, P., & Odendaal, A. (2016). Coaching supervision: towards a systemic coaching supervision framework. In L. E. van Zyl, M. W. Stander & A. Odendaal (Hrsg.), Coaching psychology: meta-theroretical perspectives and applications in multicultural contexts (S. 67–96). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kotte, S., Hinn, D., Oellerich, K., & Möller, H. (2016). Der Stand der Coachingforschung: Kernergebnisse der vorliegenden Metaanalysen. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 23(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. (2008). Coaching und Supervision. Zur personenorientierten Beratung in Organisationen. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P., & Whyte, A. (2014). What is coaching supervision and is it important? Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, H. & Kotte, S. (2011). Die Zukunft der Coachingforschung. Organisationsberatung Supervision Coaching, 18 (4), 445-456.

  • Möller, H., & Kotte, S. (2015). Supervision – past, present, future. Psychotherapie im Dialog, Themenheft Supervision, 1, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, H., Diermann, I., & Kotte, S. (2017). Zum Stand der Forschung in der Klinischen Supervision. In H. Möller & M. Lohmer (Hrsg.), Supervision in der Psychotherapie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyes, B. (2009). Literature review of coaching supervision. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4(2), 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (Hrsg.). (2011). Supervision in coaching: supervision, ethics and continuous professional development. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J., & McGoldrick, S. (2009). Super-vision, extra-vision or blind faith? A grounded theory study of the efficacy of coaching supervision. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, B. (1987). Supervision: a co-operative exercise in accountability. In M. Marken & M. Payne (Hrsg.), Enabling and ensuring supervision in practice (S. 21–34). Leicester: National Youth Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappe-Giesecke, K. (2003). Supervision für Gruppen und Teams (3. Aufl.). Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

  • Salter, T. (2008). Exploring current thinking within the field of coaching on the role of supervision. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 2, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, A. (2003). Die Differenzen zwischen Supervision und Coaching. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 10(3), 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., Wheeler, S., & Nodop, S. (2010). Klinische Supervision. Überblick über den Stand der Forschung. Psychotherapeut, 55, 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulpa, K. (2011). Foreword. In J. Passmore (Hrsg.), Supervision in coaching: Supervision, ethics and continuous professional development (S. iix–ix). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., & Richards, K. (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counsellors and therapists, their practice and their clients: a systematic review of the literature. Lutterworth: British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silja Kotte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotte, S. Supervision von Coaching. Organisationsberat Superv Coach 24, 333–346 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-017-0513-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-017-0513-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation