Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Academic medicine has a leaky pipeline for the advancement of women.1 Lack of role models, challenges with work–life balance, frustrations with features of the institutional environment, and the direct effect of implicit bias have emerged as possible explanations for the academic gender gap.1,2,3
A recent study of internal medicine faculty has suggested organizational climate, including faculty’s perceptions and experiences of gender inequities, may also contribute to the gender gap.4 Acknowledgement of such inequities and support to mitigate them has been shown to improve retention for women and minorities.5 This highlights the need for residency programs to better understand trainees’ perceptions and experiences of gender inequities since the biggest leak in the academic pipeline occurs during residency, with women’s interest in academia significantly declining.1
The purpose of this study is to describe internal medicine residents’ perceptions of gender’s effect on their resident colleagues and on their own experiences during residency.
METHODS
Setting and Sample
We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey study of the 140 residents in an academic internal medicine residency program, of which 67 identified as female.
Survey Development
Based on a literature review and informal resident focus group, we developed the survey content domains and questions. Questions focused on gender differences in communication, evaluation of clinical performance, and leadership, querying respondents’ witnessing and personally experiencing either more positive or more negative treatment based on gender and gender’s role in overall work experiences. Questions used Likert-type scale responses, with follow-up open-ended questions to invite elaboration. We collected respondent demographics of resident type, year, and gender. We pilot tested the survey among 3 chief residents and 4 clinician educators incorporating their feedback into the final version.
Analysis
We calculated descriptive statistics, examined survey responses for questions about witnessing different treatment based on gender using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, and compared responses between males and females for questions about experiencing different treatments based on gender using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. We used SAS (version 9.3, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to conduct analyses. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. To analyze open-ended responses, two authors independently reviewed responses to identify observations highlighting and expanding upon categories from the quantitative questions.
The University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board approved this research.
RESULTS
Seventy residents completed the survey (50% response rate) of which 47% were female (n = 33). Year in training and resident type were similar to overall program distribution.
Residents reported witnessing female residents being treated, on average, more negatively and reported male residents being treated more positively based on their gender in areas of communication and leadership (Table 1).
There were no significant differences between female and male residents reporting having experienced more positive treatment in any domain because of their own gender. However, there were significant differences with females reporting having been more negatively treated when compared with male respondents in all domains (Table 1).
When asked how gender affects overall work experience (response range “very negatively” = 1 to “very positively” = 5), males reported, on average, a more positive influence of gender than females (mean 3.5 [SD 0.6] vs 2.7 [SD 0.8], respectively, p < 0.001).
Open-ended responses illustrated these differences through descriptions of personal experience and attitudes (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
Our findings suggest that both male and female residents perceive that gender influences their experiences in the workplace. Residents reported witnessing female residents being treated more negatively compared with male residents. Female residents reported experiencing being treated more negatively compared with males because of their gender in multiple domains, while males reported a more positive influence of gender in their overall work experience.
We need gender-integrated residency interventions designed to acknowledge differential experiences based on gender and to teach allyship. Such interventions may promote a positive organizational culture by contributing to a more inclusive workplace, helping to mitigate bias, improving the retention of women in academic medicine, and setting the groundwork for fairness in practice environments after residency.
The generalizability of our findings may be limited as our study is a single-site study and could be influenced by social desirability bias, though open-ended responses support our quantitative findings.
References
Edmunds LD, Ovseiko P V, Shepperd S, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2948–2958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01091-0
Levine RB, Lin F, Kern DE, Wright SM, Carrese J. Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: a qualitative study at a single institution. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):752–758. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e83b
Silver JK, Rowe M, Sinha MS, Molinares DM, Spector ND, Mukherjee D. Micro-inequities in Medicine. PM R. 2018;10(10):1106–1114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.08.382
Ruzycki SM, Freeman G, Bharwani A, Brown A. Association of Physician Characteristics With Perceptions and Experiences of Gender Equity in an Academic Internal Medicine Department. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1915165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15165
Salter N, Migliaccio L. Allyship as a Diversity and Inclusion Tool in the Workplace. In: Diversity within Diversity Management; 2019:131–152.
Funding
This study was funded by a University of Minnesota Division of General Internal Medicine pilot grant. Dr. Rogers was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number K23DK118207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders. All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. E.K. Moser-Bleil has changed affiliation and is now with Fairview Health Services.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Prior Poster Presentation:
2017 Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, E.A., Moser-Bleil, E.K., Duffy, B.L. et al. Gender Matters: Internal Medicine Resident Perceptions of Gender Bias in Medical Training. J GEN INTERN MED 36, 1448–1450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05772-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05772-8