The Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education Trial: a Cluster Randomized Trial Addressing Health Communication in Diabetes Care
Effective type 2 diabetes care remains a challenge for patients including those receiving primary care in safety net settings.
The Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education (PRIDE) trial team and leaders from a regional department of health evaluated approaches to improve care for vulnerable patients.
Cluster randomized controlled trial.
Adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes seeking care across 10 unblinded, randomly assigned safety net clinics in Middle TN.
A literacy-sensitive, provider-focused, health communication intervention (PRIDE; 5 clinics) vs. standard diabetes education (5 clinics).
Participant-level primary outcome was glycemic control [A1c] at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included select health behaviors and psychosocial aspects of care at 12 and 24 months. Adjusted mixed effects regression models were used to examine the comparative effectiveness of each approach to care.
Of 410 patients enrolled, 364 (89%) were included in analyses. Median age was 51 years; Black and Hispanic patients represented 18% and 25%; 96% were uninsured, and 82% had low annual income level (< $20,000); adequate health literacy was seen in 83%, but numeracy deficits were common. At 12 months, significant within-group treatment effects occurred from baseline for both PRIDE and control sites: adjusted A1c (− 0.76 [95% CI, − 1.08 to − 0.44]; P < .001 vs − 0.54 [95% CI, − 0.86 to − 0.21]; P = .001), odds of poor eating (0.53 [95% CI, 0.33–0.83]; P = .01 vs 0.42 [95% CI, 0.26–0.68]; P < .001), treatment satisfaction (3.93 [95% CI, 2.48–6.21]; P < .001 vs 3.04 [95% CI, 1.93–4.77]; P < .001), and self-efficacy (2.97 [95% CI, 1.89–4.67]; P < .001 vs 1.81 [95% CI, 1.1–2.84]; P = .01). No significant difference was observed between study arms in adjusted analyses.
Both interventions improved the participant’s A1c and behavioral outcomes. PRIDE was not more effective than standard education. Further research may elucidate the added value of a focused health communication program in this setting.
KEY WORDSdiabetes care disparities health communication vulnerable populations public health
Adherence to Refills and Medication Scale
Body mass index
Diabetes Numeracy Test
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
National Diabetes Education Program
Patient-centered medical home
Personal Diabetes Questionnaire
Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale
Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education
Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities
Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults
Tennessee Department of Health
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
The PRIDE team thanks the leadership at the TDOH, especially Cathy Taylor DrPH, RN, and all of the patients who gave their time and efforts. We acknowledge the recruitment efforts of Laura Chambers, Alexis and Nicolas Ludi, and Ricardo Trochez.
All authors attest to meeting the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors uniform requirements for authorship. DS, KAW, LAH, JSS, SK, and RLR led the development of the PRIDE partnership, study design, and implementation. ROW, KW, BPG, DD, SB, SK, and RLR conducted provider trainings and evaluated the low-literacy materials, including the cultural adaptation of Spanish materials led by ROW. ROW, KMT, and SB were responsible for data and program management and recruitment. AB and JSS led data analyses. ROW, RJC, and JSS led data interpretation and manuscript writing. All authors gave final manuscript approval. ROW guarantees the work.
This study was funded by 5R18 DK083264 and ROW supported by K23 5DK092470 from the NIDDK. Additional support was obtained from Vanderbilt University CTSA 5UL1TR000445, Vanderbilt CDTR DK092986, and study data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Rothman is a consultant for edLogics and Abbott, unrelated to the current project.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Diabetes Statistics Report. Atlanta (GA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2017, p. 20Google Scholar
- 3.Ali MK, McKeever Bullard K, Imperatore G, Barker L, Gregg EW, Centers for Disease C, Prevention: Characteristics associated with poor glycemic control among adults with self-reported diagnosed diabetes--National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2007-2010. MMWR Suppl 2012;61:32–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rothman RL, Malone R, Bryant B, Shintani AK, Crigler B, Dewalt DA, Dittus RS, Weinberger M, Pignone MP: A randomized trial of a primary care-based disease management program to improve cardiovascular risk factors and glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with diabetes. Am J Med 2005;118:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wolff K, Cavanaugh K, Malone R, Hawk V, Gregory BP, Davis D, Wallston K, Rothman RL: The Diabetes Literacy and Numeracy Education Toolkit (DLNET): materials to facilitate diabetes education and management in patients with low literacy and numeracy skills. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:233–236, 238–241, 244–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Vanderbilt University: The public private partnership addressing literacy-numeracy to improve diabetes care (PRIDE). In ClinicalTrialsgov Bethesda (MD), National Library of Medicine (NLM), 2011Google Scholar
- 19.National Diabetes Education Program [article online], 2017. Available from https://nccd.cdc.gov/DDT_DPR/. Accessed 2018 Mar 2
- 23.Baker DW, DeWalt DA, Schillinger D, Hawk V, Ruo B, Bibbins-Domingo K, Weinberger M, Macabasco-O’Connell A, Pignone M: “Teach to goal”: theory and design principles of an intervention to improve heart failure self-management skills of patients with low health literacy. J Health Commun 2011;16 Suppl 3:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bowen ME, Cavanaugh KL, Wolff K, Davis D, Gregory RP, Shintani A, Eden S, Wallston K, Elasy T, Rothman RL: The diabetes nutrition education study randomized controlled trial: a comparative effectiveness study of approaches to nutrition in diabetes self-management education. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:1368–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Harrell FE, Jr: Regression Modeling Strategies. New York, Springer, 2016Google Scholar