Advertisement

Evaluating the Concordance of Clinician Antiretroviral Prescribing Practices and HIV-ASSIST, an Online Clinical Decision Support Tool

  • Jesus A. RamirezEmail author
  • Manoj V. Maddali
  • Jehan Z. Budak
  • Jonathan Z. Li
  • Harry Lampiris
  • Maunank Shah
Original Research
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Individualized selection of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy is complex, considering drug resistance, comorbidities, drug-drug interactions, and other factors. HIV-ASSIST (www.hivassist.com) is a free, online tool that provides ARV decision support. HIV-ASSIST synthesizes patient and virus-specific attributes to rank ARV combinations based upon a composite objective of achieving viral suppression and maximizing tolerability.

Objective

To evaluate concordance of HIV-ASSIST recommendations with ARV selections of experienced HIV clinicians.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Patients

New and established patients at the Johns Hopkins Bartlett HIV Clinic and San Francisco Veterans Affairs HIV Clinic completing clinic visits were included. Chart reviews were conducted of the most recent clinic visit to generate HIV-ASSIST recommendations, which were compared to prescribed regimens.

Main Measures

For each provider-prescribed regimen, we assessed its corresponding HIV-ASSIST “weighted score” (scale of 0 to 10 +, scores of < 2.0 are preferred), rank within HIV-ASSIST’s ordered listing of ARV regimens, and concordance with the top five HIV-ASSIST ranked outputs.

Key Results

Among 106 patients (16% female), 23 (22%) were ARV-naïve. HIV-ASSIST outputs for ARV-naïve patients were 100% concordant with prescribed regimens (median rank 1 [IQR 1–3], median weighted score 1.1 [IQR 1–1.2]). For 18 (17%) ARV-experienced patients with ongoing viremia, HIV-ASSIST outputs were 89% concordant with prescribed regimens (median rank 2 [IQR 1–3], median weighted score 1 [IQR 1–1.2]). For 65 (61.3%) patients that were suppressed on a current ARV regimen, HIV-ASSIST recommendations were concordant 88% of the time (median rank 1 [IQR 1–1], median weighted score 1.1 [IQR 1–1.6]). In 18% of cases, HIV-ASSIST weighted score suggested that the prescribed regimen would be considered “less preferred” (score > 2.0) than other available alternatives.

Conclusion

HIV-ASSIST is an educational decision support tool that provides ARV recommendations concordant with experienced HIV providers from two major academic centers for a diverse set of patient scenarios.

KEY WORDS

HIV prescribing clinical MCDA tool 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the administrative support for chart reviews at Bartlett Clinic from Ms. Jeanne Keruly.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2019_5531_MOESM1_ESM.docx (79 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    CDC. HIV in the United States: At A Glance. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html [Accessed April 2019].
  2. 2.
    CDC-Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention. Understanding the HIV Care Continuum. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/factsheets/cdc-hiv-care-continuum.pdf [Accessed April 2019].
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas, 2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2017;22(No. 2). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html [Accessed April 2019].
  4. 4.
    Samji H, Cescon A, Hogg RS, Modur SP, Althoff KN, Buchacz K, et al. Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada. PLoS One 2013,8:e81355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Justice AC. HIV and aging: time for a new paradigm. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2010,7:69-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deeks SG, Lewin SR, Havlir DV. The end of AIDS: HIV infection as a chronic disease. Lancet 2013,382:1525-1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    HIV Clinician Workforce in the US. https://aahivm.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/FINAL-August-2016.pdf. [Accessed April 2019].
  8. 8.
    US Dept of Health and Human Services. The U.S. health workforce chartbook. http://bhpr.hrsa.gov.ezp.welch.jhmi.edu.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/healthworkforce/supplydemand/usworkforce/chartbook/chartbookpart1.pdf. [Accessed April 2019].
  9. 9.
    Landon BE, Wilson IB, McInnes K, Landrum MB, Hirschhorn LR, Marsden PV, Cleary PD. Physician specialization and the quality of care for human immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Intern Med 2005,165:1133-1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng QJ, Engelage EM, Grogan TR, Currier JS, Hoffman RM. Who Provides Primary Care? An Assessment of HIV Patient and Provider Practices and Preferences. J AIDS Clin Res 2014,5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crowley T, Stellenberg EL. Integrating HIV care and treatment into primary healthcare: are clinics equipped?. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014;6(1):E1–E7. Published 2014 Aug 28.  https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    HIV Medicine Association. HIV clinic capacity and workforce challenges: results of a survey of Ryan White Part C programs. National Summit on HIV Diagnosis, Prevention and Access to Care. http://www.hivforum.org. Accessed 29 Apr 2019.
  13. 13.
    DHHS Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents. 2019. http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines [Accessed April 2019].
  14. 14.
    Gunthard HF, Saag MS, Benson CA, del Rio C, Eron JJ, Gallant JE, et al. Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment and Prevention of HIV Infection in Adults: 2016 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA 2016,316:191-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maddali MV, Li J, Shah M. Development of HIV-ASSIST, an Online, Educational, Clinical Decision Support Tool to Guide Patient-Centered ARV Regimen Selection. OFID. 2018; S404-405. [Accessed April 2019].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maddali, Manoj V., Nicky J. Mehtani, et al. Development and Validation of HIV-ASSIST, an Online, Educational, Clinical Decision Support Tool to Guide Patient-centered ARV Regimen Selection. JAIDS. Published Ahead of Print (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thokala P, Devlin N, Marsh K, et al. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for 401 Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(1):1-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marsh K, IJzerman M, Thokala P, et al. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(2):125-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Methodology: How does this all work? | HIV-ASSIST. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.hivassist.com/about/methodology. Accessed 29 Apr 2019.
  20. 20.
    Maddali MV, Mehtani JN, Converse C, Kapoor S, Li JZ, Shah M. (2019) Development and Validation of HIV-ASSIST, an Online, Educational, Clinical Decision Support Tool to Guide Patient-Centered ARV Regimen Selection. Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting; 2019 May 8-11; Washington DC.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    FDA. Drug Approvals and Databases - Drug Trials Snapshot: BIKTARVY. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ucm597572.htm. [Accessed April 2019].
  22. 22.
    FDA. Drug Approval Package: Juluca (dolutegravir and rilpivirine) Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/210192Orig1s000TOC.cfm. [Accessed April 2019].

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Commonwealth University, School of MedicineRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Division of Infectious DiseasesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  6. 6.Infectious Disease Section, Medical ServiceSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  7. 7.Division of Infectious DiseasesJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations