Access to Primary, Mental Health, and Specialty Care: a Comparison of Medicaid and Commercially Insured Populations in Oregon
To describe how access to primary and specialty care differs for Medicaid patients relative to commercially insured patients, and how these differences vary across rural and urban counties, using comprehensive claims data from Oregon.
Cross-sectional study of risk-adjusted access rates for two types of primary care providers (physicians; nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)); four types of mental health providers (psychiatrists, psychologists, advanced practice NPs or PAs specializing in mental health care, behavioral specialists); and four physician specialties (obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, gastroenterology, dermatology).
420,947 Medicaid and 638,980 commercially insured adults in Oregon, October 2014–September 2015.
Presence of any visit with each provider type, risk-adjusted for sex, age, and health conditions.
Relative to commercially insured individuals, Medicaid enrollees had lower rates of access to primary care physicians (− 11.82%; CI − 12.01 to − 11.63%) and to some specialists (e.g., obstetrics and gynecology, dermatology), but had equivalent or higher rates of access to NPs and PAs providing primary care (4.33%; CI 4.15 to 4.52%) and a variety of mental health providers (including psychiatrists, NPs and PAs, and other behavioral specialists). Across all providers, the largest gaps in Medicaid-commercial access rates were observed in rural counties. The Medicaid-commercial patient mix was evenly distributed across primary care physicians, suggesting that access for Medicaid patients was not limited to a small subset of primary care providers.
This cross-sectional study found lower rates of access to primary care physicians for Medicaid enrollees, but Medicaid-commercial differences in access rates were not present across all provider types and displayed substantial variability across counties. Policies that address rural-urban differences as well as Medicaid-commercial differences—such as expansions of telemedicine or changes in the workforce mix—may have the largest impact on improving access to care across a wide range of populations.
KEY WORDSMedicaid access to care health policy disparities rural health
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1R01MD011212). Melinda Davis was partially supported by an NCI K07 award (1K07CA211971-01A1, PI: Davis).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Oregon Health & Science University.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 3.Verma S. Speech: Remarks by Administrator Seema Verma at the National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) 2017 Fall Conference | CMS. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/speech-remarks-administrator-seema-verma-national-association-medicaid-directors-namd-2017-fall. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 8.Long SK, Stockley K, Grimm E, Coyer C. National Findings on Access to Health Care and Service Use for Non-Elderly Adults Enrolled in Medicaid (MACPAC Contractor Report No. 2,); 2012. https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Contractor-Report-No_2.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 23.Oregon Health Authority. All Payer All Claims Reporting Program. March 2018. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/ANALYTICS/APAC%20Page%20Docs/APAC-Overview.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 27.Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid Spending per Enrollee (Full or Partial Benefit). Henry J Kais Fam Found. June 2017. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/medicaid-spending-per-enrollee/. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 28.Zuckerman S, Skopec L, Epstein M. Medicaid Physician Fees after the ACA Primary Care Fee Bump. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/medicaid-physician-fees-after-aca-primary-care-fee-bump. Published March 9, 2017. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 30.United States Department of Agriculutre Economic Research Service. State Data: Oregon. State Fact Sheets. https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?StateFIPS=41&StateName=Oregon&ID=17854#Pa578a9f8109d444ab1b570e93ea08d16_2_39iT0. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 32.Association of American Medical Colleges. 2015 State Physician Workforce Data Book. Washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2015.Google Scholar
- 33.Oregon Health Authority. Oregon’s Primary Care Workforce: Based on Data Collected during 2015 and 2016. Portland, OR: Oregon Health Authority; 2017.Google Scholar
- 34.Oregon Center for Nursing and the Oregon Healthcare Workforce Institute. Oregon’s Licensed Behavioral/Mental Health Care Workforce. Portland, OR: Oregon Health Authority; 2015.Google Scholar
- 37.Hart G. Rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes (version 2.0). 2006.Google Scholar
- 38.StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2017.Google Scholar
- 39.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2018. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 44.Berenson RA, Hayes E, Lallemand NC. Health Care Stewardship: Oregon Case Study. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/health-care-stewardship-oregon-case-study. Published June 4, 2016. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 45.Mulcahy AW, Gracner T, Finegold K. Associations between the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Medicaid primary care payment increase and physician participation in Medicaid. JAMA Intern Med. 2018.Google Scholar
- 48.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Programs; Medicaid Managed Care, CHIP Delivered in Managed Care, and Revisions Related to Third Party Liability [81 FR 27497]. Washington DC; 2016. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/05/06/2016-09581/medicaid-and-childrens-health-insurance-program-chip-programs-medicaid-managed-care-chip-delivered. Accessed July 30, 2019.
- 49.Lipson DJ, Libersky J, Braley K, Lewis C, Siegwarth AW, Lester R. Promoting access in Medicaid and CHIP managed care: a toolkit for ensurng provider network adequacy and service availability. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Institute; 2017.Google Scholar
- 50.Ndumele CD, Cohen MS, Cleary PD. Association of State access standards with accessibility to specialists for Medicaid managed care enrollees. JAMA Intern Med. 2017.Google Scholar
- 51.Ash AS, Mick EO, Ellis RP, Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Clark MA. Social determinants of health in managed care payment formulas. JAMA Intern Med. 2017.Google Scholar
- 53.Artiga S, Hinton E. Beyond health care: the role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity. Washington DC: Kaiser Family Foundatin; 2018.Google Scholar