Satisfaction with Primary Care Providers and Health Care Services Among Patients with Chronic Pain: a Mixed-Methods Study
Chronic pain is a prevalent health concern in the United States (US) and a frequent reason for patients to seek primary care. The challenges associated with developing effective pain management strategies can be perceived as a burden on the patient-provider relationship.
This study explored the relationship between patients’ overall satisfaction with their primary care providers (PCPs) and their satisfaction with their chronic pain treatment, as well as the provider behaviors that contributed to chronic pain patients’ satisfaction with their PCPs.
Concurrent nested mixed-methods design
97 patients with chronic pain who were assigned to the usual care arm of the Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) study.
We analyzed phone interview and survey data (n = 97). Interviews assessed provider behaviors that led to patient satisfaction. Interview transcripts were analyzed based on a content analysis approach. Survey responses assessed patient satisfaction with primary care and pain services. We calculated a Pearson’s correlation coefficient using five response categories.
Interviews revealed that high satisfaction with primary care was driven by five concrete PCP behaviors: (1) listening, (2) maintaining communication with patients, (3) acting as an access point to comprehensive pain care, (4) providing an honest assessment of the possibilities of pain care, and (5) taking time during consultations with patients. In surveys, participants reported higher satisfaction with their primary care services than with the pain services they received; these variables were only moderately correlated (r = 0.586).
Results suggest that patients with chronic pain can view the relationship with their PCPs as positive, even in the face of low satisfaction with their pain treatment. The expectations that these patients held of PCPs could be met regardless of providers’ ability to successfully relieve chronic pain.
KEY WORDSprimary care relationship chronic pain treatment satisfaction mixed methods
The PPACT study is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund, through a cooperative agreement (UH2AT007788, UH3NS088731) from the Office of Strategic Coordination within the Office of the NIH Director.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the KPNW Institutional Review Board. All study procedures followed the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
The views presented here are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
- 3.Institute of Medicine Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care and Education. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) National Academy of Sciences; 2011.Google Scholar
- 16.Brown JB, Moira S; Bridget R. Outcomes of patient-provider interaction. In: Thompson TLD, Alicia M, Miller KI, Parrott R, eds. Handbook of Health Communication. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003:141–161.Google Scholar
- 20.Upshur CC, Bacigalupe G, Luckmann R. “They don’t want anything to do with you”: patient views of primary care management of chronic pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(12):1791–1798.Google Scholar
- 28.McCracken LM, Klock PA, Mingay DJ, Asbury JK, Sinclair DM. Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1997;14(5):292–299.Google Scholar
- 33.Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Gutman ML, Hanson WE. An Expanded Typology for Classifying Mixed Methods Research Into Designs. In: Tashakkori ATC, ed. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:209–240.Google Scholar
- 34.Mayhew M, DeBar LL, Deyo RA, et al. Development and assessment of a crosswalk between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM to identify patients with common pain conditions. J Pain. 2019Google Scholar
- 38.Groenewoud S, Van Exel NJ, Bobinac A, Berg M, Huijsman R, Stolk EA. What influences patients’ decisions when choosing a health care provider? Measuring preferences of patients with knee arthrosis, chronic depression, or Alzheimer’s disease, using discrete choice experiments. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(6):1941–1972.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Matthias MS, Krebs EE, Bergman AA, Coffing JM, Bair MJ. Communicating about opioids for chronic pain: a qualitative study of patient attributions and the influence of the patient-physician relationship. Eur J Pain. 2014;18(6):835–843.Google Scholar