Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 11, pp 2460–2466 | Cite as

Factors Associated with Psychiatrist Opt-out from US Medicare: an Observational Study

  • Jiani Yu
  • Anupam B. Jena
  • Pinar Karaca Mandic
  • Ezra GolbersteinEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Concerns exist about availability and access to psychiatric services in the USA. For Medicare beneficiaries, one impediment to psychiatric services is the extent to which psychiatrists have opted out of the Medicare program.

Objective

This study describes geographic variation in rates that psychiatrists opt out of Medicare, and assesses physician-level and geographic-level predictors of opt-out.

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data describing psychiatrists’ opt-out status as of March 2017 linked to data on psychiatrist location, psychiatrist characteristics (obtained from a comprehensive US physician database), and market area–level characteristics.

Participants

27,838 psychiatrists in the USA

Main Measures

Whether a psychiatrist had opted out of Medicare as of March 2017.

Key Results

Overall, 7.0% of psychiatrists (1940/27,838) opted out of Medicare as of March 2017. Opt-out rates varied substantially across states and within states. Physician-level factors independently associated with opt-out included: older age (psychiatrists > 65 years were 2.6 percentage points more likely to opt vs. psychiatrists < 35 years old, p = 0.03), greater years of experience, female gender (female psychiatrists were 2.6 percentage points more likely to opt out than male psychiatrists, p < 0.001), graduation from a top-20 ranked medical school (1.7 percentage points more likely to opt out of Medicare, p < 0.001), and domestic medical graduate (domestic graduates were 7.3 percentage points more likely to opt out of Medicare vs. foreign graduates, p < 0.001). Adjusting for other individual- and geographic-level factors, psychiatrists who practiced in areas with more psychiatrists per Medicare beneficiary were less likely to opt out (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The overall likelihood that psychiatrists opt out of Medicare is significant and varies considerably across regions and by characteristics of psychiatrists.

KEY WORDS

psychiatry Medicare workforce access to care 

Notes

Funding

Dr. Jena received support from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (DP5OD017897).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved as exempt from review by the institutional review board of the University of Minnesota.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Jena received support from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (DP5OD017897), and has received consulting fees unrelated to this work from Pfizer, Hill Rom Services, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Tesaro, Sanofi Aventis, Biogen, Precision Health Economics, and Analysis Group; Dr. Karaca Mandic received no support from any organization for the submitted work, and provides consulting services to Precision Health Economics that have no relation to this manuscript; all remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2019_5246_MOESM1_ESM.docx (336 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 335 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas KC, Ellis AR, Konrad TR, Holzer CE, Morrissey JP. County-level estimates of mental health professional shortage in the United States. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1323–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishop TF, Press MJ, Keyhani S, Pincus HA. Acceptance of insurance by psychiatrists and the implications for access to mental health care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu JM, Zhang Y, Polsky D. Networks in ACA marketplaces are narrower for mental health care than for primary care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36:1624–1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008. in 122 STAT 24942008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peterson E, Busch S. Achieving mental health and substance use disorder treatment parity: a quarter century of policy making and research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bocutti C, Neuman P. Private Contracts Between Doctors and Medicare Patients: Key Questions and Implications of Proposed Policy Changes. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2017.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commision: March 2017 Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare Individual Provider List. 2017.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014. JAMA. 2015;314:1149–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jena AB, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in physician salary in US Public Medical Schools. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:1294–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Quality of care delivered by general internists in US hospitals who graduated from foreign versus US medical schools: observational study. BMJ. 2017;356:j273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsugawa Y, Newhouse JP, Zaslavsky AM, Blumenthal DM, Jena AB. Physician age and outcomes in elderly patients in hospital in the US: observational study. BMJ. 2017;357:j1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS). 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kilaru AS, Wiebe DJ, Karp DN, Love J, Kallan MJ, Carr BG. Do hospital service areas and hospital referral regions define discrete health care populations? Med Care. 2015;53:510–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goodman DC, Mick SS, Bott D, Stukel T, Chang CH, Marth N, Poage J, Carretta HJ. Primary care service areas: a new tool for the evaluation of primary care services. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    US News and World Report: Best Medical Schools: Research. 2017.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Health Resources and Services Administration: Primary Care Service Area Data Download - 2010. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Public Use File. 2017.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    US Census Bureau: American Community Survey. 2017.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. 3. College Station, Stata Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sloan FA, Steinwald B. Physician participation in health-insurance plans - evidence on blue shield. J Hum Resour. 1978;13:237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reid RO, Friedberg MW, Adams JL, McGlynn EA, Mehrotra A. Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1442–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bishop TF, Seirup JK, Pincus HA, Ross JS. Population of us practicing psychiatrists declined, 2003-13, which may help explain poor access to mental health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35:1271–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heisler EJ. The Mental Health Workforce: A Primer. Congressional Research Service; 2018.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Resident Matching Program: National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: 2018 Maid Residency Match. Washington, DC2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiani Yu
    • 1
  • Anupam B. Jena
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Pinar Karaca Mandic
    • 4
    • 5
  • Ezra Golberstein
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Health Policy and Management University of Minnesota School of Public HealthMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Care PolicyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeUSA
  5. 5.Department of FinanceUniversity of Minnesota Carlson School of ManagementMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations