Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 11, pp 2368–2373 | Cite as

Perceived Adequacy of Tangible Social Support and Associations with Health Outcomes Among Older Primary Care Patients

  • Rachel O’ConorEmail author
  • Julia Yoshino Benavente
  • Marina Arvanitis
  • Laura M. Curtis
  • Kamal Eldeirawi
  • Romana Hasnain-Wynia
  • Alex D. Federman
  • Jeni Hebert-Beirne
  • Michael S. Wolf
Original Research

Abstract

Background

The availability and adequacy of tangible social support may be critical to older adults managing multiple chronic conditions, yet few studies have evaluated the perceived adequacy of needed tangible support and its relation to health outcomes.

Objective

We investigated the association between unmet, tangible social support needs, health status, and urgent healthcare use among community-dwelling older adults.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis.

Participants

English-speaking older adults (n = 469) who participated in the Health Literacy and Cognitive Function cohort study.

Main Measures

Perceived adequacy of tangible social support was measured using a brief, validated scale that determined (1) if an individual needed assistance managing his or her health, and (2) if yes, whether this need was met. Health status was measured using physical function, depression, and anxiety PROMIS short-form instruments. Urgent healthcare utilization (emergency department and hospitalization) was self-reported for the past 12 months.

Key Results

Participants’ mean age was 69 years; 73% were women and 31% were African American, and 16% identified unmet support needs. Unmet support needs were associated with worse physical (β − 6.32; 95% CI − 8.31, − 4.34) and mental health (anxiety: β 3.84; 95% CI 1.51, 6.17; depression: β 2.45; 95% CI 0.32, 4.59) and greater urgent healthcare utilization (ED: OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.51, 5.41; hospitalization: OR 3.75; 95% CI 1.88, 7.50).

Conclusions

Perceived unmet support needs were associated with worse health status and greater urgent healthcare use. Primary care practices might consider screening older patients for unmet tangible support needs, although appropriate responses should first be established if unmet needs are identified.

KEY WORDS

social support aging patient-reported outcomes 

Notes

Financial Support

This work was supported by a research grant from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG030611).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Michael Wolf reports receiving consultancy fees from Abbot, Abbvie, Luto, Merck, United HealthCare, and Vivus, as well as research grants from Abbot, Abbvie, Merck, and United HealthCare. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, LeRoy L, Ricciardi R, Miller T, et al. Multiple Chronic Conditions Chartbook. AHRQ Publications No. Q14–0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward BW. Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions among US Adults: Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gallant MP. The Influence of Social Support on Chronic Illness Self-Management: A Review and Directions for Research. Health Educ Behav 2003;30(2):170–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 2004;23(2):207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010;7(7):e1000316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holt-Lunstad J, Uchino BN. Social Support and Health. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2015:183–242.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valtorta NK, Moore DC, Barron L, Stow D, Hanratty B. Older Adults’ Social Relationships and Health Care Utilization: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health 2018;108(4):e1-e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, MedicineAccounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment: Identifying Social Risk Factors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Tosteson AN, Chang CH, Wright B, Plohman J, et al. Perceived adequacy of tangible social support and health outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12(10):613–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song Y, Song H-J, Han H-R, Park S-Y, Nam S, Kim MT. Unmet Needs for Social Support and Effects on Diabetes Self-care Activities in Korean Americans With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2012;38(1):77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolf MS, Curtis LM, Wilson EA, Revelle W, Waite KR, Smith SG, et al. Literacy, cognitive function, and health: results of the LitCog study. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(10):1300–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Conor R, Smith SG, Curtis LM, Benavente JY, Vicencio DP, Wolf MS. Mild Visual Impairment and Its Impact on Self-Care Among Older Adults. J Aging Health 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care 2002;40(9):771–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63(11):1179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yost KJ, Eton DT, Garcia SF, Cella D. Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(5):507–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10(10):537–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, Iliffe S, von Renteln Kruse W, Beck JC, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006;46(4):503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lubben JE. Assessing social networks among elderly populations. Fam Community Health 1988;11(3):42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolff JL, Feder J, Schulz R. Supporting Family Caregivers of Older Americans. N Engl J Med 2016;375(26):2513–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241(4865):540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Solar O, Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 2001;27(1):415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cornwell B. Social Disadvantage and Network Turnover. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2015;70(1):132–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Diez Roux AV, Katz M, Crews DC, Ross D, Adler N. Social and Behavioral Information in Electronic Health Records: New Opportunities for Medicine and Public HealthAm J Prev Med 2015;49(6):980–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garg A, Boynton-Jarrett R, Dworkin PH. Avoiding the unintended consequences of screening for social determinants of health. JAMA. 2016;316(8):813–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Given B, Sherwood PR, Given CW. What knowledge and skills do caregivers need? J Soc Work Educ 2008;44(sup3):115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reinhard SC, Levine C, Samis S. Home alone: Family caregivers providing complex chronic care: AARP Public Policy Institute Washington, DC; 2012.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Revenson T, Griva K, Luszczynska A, Morrison V, Panagopoulou E, Vilchinsky N, et al. Caregiving in the Illness Context: Palgrave Macmillian; London; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rowe JW, Fulmer T, Fried L. Preparing for better health and health care for an aging population. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1643–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wolinsky FD, Miller TR, An H, et al. Hospital episodes and physician visits: the concordance between self-reports and medicare claims. Med Care 2007;45(4):300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Uchino BN. Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspect Psychol Sci 2009;4(3):236–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel O’Conor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julia Yoshino Benavente
    • 1
  • Marina Arvanitis
    • 1
  • Laura M. Curtis
    • 1
  • Kamal Eldeirawi
    • 2
  • Romana Hasnain-Wynia
    • 3
  • Alex D. Federman
    • 4
  • Jeni Hebert-Beirne
    • 5
  • Michael S. Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.College of NursingUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Office of ResearchDenver Health and Hospital AuthorityDenverUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Internal MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations