Perceived Adequacy of Tangible Social Support and Associations with Health Outcomes Among Older Primary Care Patients
- 97 Downloads
The availability and adequacy of tangible social support may be critical to older adults managing multiple chronic conditions, yet few studies have evaluated the perceived adequacy of needed tangible support and its relation to health outcomes.
We investigated the association between unmet, tangible social support needs, health status, and urgent healthcare use among community-dwelling older adults.
English-speaking older adults (n = 469) who participated in the Health Literacy and Cognitive Function cohort study.
Perceived adequacy of tangible social support was measured using a brief, validated scale that determined (1) if an individual needed assistance managing his or her health, and (2) if yes, whether this need was met. Health status was measured using physical function, depression, and anxiety PROMIS short-form instruments. Urgent healthcare utilization (emergency department and hospitalization) was self-reported for the past 12 months.
Participants’ mean age was 69 years; 73% were women and 31% were African American, and 16% identified unmet support needs. Unmet support needs were associated with worse physical (β − 6.32; 95% CI − 8.31, − 4.34) and mental health (anxiety: β 3.84; 95% CI 1.51, 6.17; depression: β 2.45; 95% CI 0.32, 4.59) and greater urgent healthcare utilization (ED: OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.51, 5.41; hospitalization: OR 3.75; 95% CI 1.88, 7.50).
Perceived unmet support needs were associated with worse health status and greater urgent healthcare use. Primary care practices might consider screening older patients for unmet tangible support needs, although appropriate responses should first be established if unmet needs are identified.
KEY WORDSsocial support aging patient-reported outcomes
This work was supported by a research grant from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG030611).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Michael Wolf reports receiving consultancy fees from Abbot, Abbvie, Luto, Merck, United HealthCare, and Vivus, as well as research grants from Abbot, Abbvie, Merck, and United HealthCare. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, LeRoy L, Ricciardi R, Miller T, et al. Multiple Chronic Conditions Chartbook. AHRQ Publications No. Q14–0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.Google Scholar
- 2.Ward BW. Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions among US Adults: Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10.Google Scholar
- 6.Holt-Lunstad J, Uchino BN. Social Support and Health. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2015:183–242.Google Scholar
- 8.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, MedicineAccounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment: Identifying Social Risk Factors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017.Google Scholar
- 12.O’Conor R, Smith SG, Curtis LM, Benavente JY, Vicencio DP, Wolf MS. Mild Visual Impairment and Its Impact on Self-Care Among Older Adults. J Aging Health 2016.Google Scholar
- 22.Solar O, Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010.Google Scholar
- 28.Reinhard SC, Levine C, Samis S. Home alone: Family caregivers providing complex chronic care: AARP Public Policy Institute Washington, DC; 2012.Google Scholar