Effect of Intensive Interdisciplinary Transitional Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients on Quality, Outcomes, and Costs: a Quasi-Experimental Study
Many health systems have implemented team-based programs to improve transitions from hospital to home for high-need, high-cost patients. While preliminary outcomes are promising, there is limited evidence regarding the most effective strategies.
To determine the effect of an intensive interdisciplinary transitional care program emphasizing medication adherence and rapid primary care follow-up for high-need, high-cost Medicaid and Medicare patients on quality, outcomes, and costs.
Among 2235 high-need, high-cost Medicare and Medicaid patients identified during an index inpatient hospitalization in a non-profit health care system in a medically underserved area with complete administrative claims data, 285 participants were enrolled in the SafeMed care transition intervention, and 1950 served as concurrent controls.
The SafeMed team conducted hospital-based real-time screening, patient engagement, enrollment, enhanced discharge care coordination, and intensive home visits and telephone follow-up for at least 45 days.
Primary difference‐in‐differences analyses examined changes in quality (primary care visits, and medication adherence), outcomes (preventable emergency visits and hospitalizations, overall emergency visits, hospitalizations, 30‐day readmissions, and hospital days), and medical expenditures.
Adjusted difference-in-differences analyses demonstrated that SafeMed participation was associated with 7% fewer hospitalizations (− 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), − 0.73 to − 0.06), 31% fewer 30-day readmissions (− 0.34; 95% CI, − 0.61 to − 0.07), and reduced medical expenditures ($− 8690; 95% CI, $− 14,441 to $− 2939) over 6 months. Improvements were limited to Medicaid patients, who experienced large, statistically significant decreases of 39% in emergency department visits, 25% in hospitalizations, and 79% in 30-day readmissions. Medication adherence was unchanged (+ 2.6%; 95% CI, − 39.1% to 72.9%).
Care transition models emphasizing strong interdisciplinary patient engagement and rapid primary care follow-up can enable health systems to improve quality and outcomes while reducing costs among high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients.
KEY WORDScare transitions chronic disease health care delivery underserved populations quality improvement super-utilizer multiple chronic conditions Medicaid Medicare
The authors gratefully acknowledge Patti Smith, MPH, for her editorial assistance; Karen Hopper, MD, Michelle Scroggins, FNP, Paula Bell, PharmD, Angel Jones, PharmD, Leigh Anne Keough, PharmD, Caprice Brown, RN, Bonnye Griffin, MSW, Cassandra Norwood, MSW, Patricia Wright, LPN, Brittney Willoughby, LPN, Justin Wright, CPT, Amanda Clayborne-Clark, CPT, Jill Connors, PhD, Sarah Henning, MHSA, and Mansoor Shahid, MHA for their dedicated service to vulnerable patients in need; and most importantly, to the people served by the SafeMed program who helped us understand the care they need most.
The project described was supported by Grant Number ICIMS 331067-01-00 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the US Department of Health and Human Services or any of its agencies. In addition, this work was partially supported by the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and the Robert S. Pearce Endowed Chair in Internal Medicine.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.Cohen SB, Yu W. The concentration and persistence in the level of health expenditures over time: estimates for the U.S. population, 2008-2009. Statistical Brief #354. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2014. Available at https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2019.
- 2.Jiang HJ, Weiss A, Barrett ML, Sheng M. Characteristics of hospital stays for super-utilizers by payer, 2012. HCUP Statistical Brief [Internet]. May 30, 2017; #190. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb190-Hospital-Stays-Super-Utilizers-Payer-2012.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2019.
- 3.Health Affairs. Health Affairs Blog [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: Health Affairs. 2012 September 12 [cited 2019 March 13]. Available at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20120921.023379/full/.
- 4.Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Reducing hospital readmissions: a revolutionary approach to improving health care delivery. [Internet]. Princeton, NJ: RWJF; 2014 Feb 1 [cited March 13, 2019]. Available at: https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2014/02/improving-management-of-health-care-superutilizers.html. Accessed 13 March 2019.
- 5.Gawande A. The hot spotters: can we lower medical costs by giving the neediest patients better care? The New Yorker. January 2011. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/01/24/the-hot-spotters. Accessed 13 March 2019.
- 8.Long P, Abrams M, Milstein A, Anderson G, Lewis Apton K, Lund Dahlberg M, et al. Effective care for high-need patients: opportunities for improving outcomes, value, and health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine, 2017.Google Scholar
- 9.Hong CS, Siegal AL, Ferris TG. Caring for high-need, high-cost patients: what makes for a successful care management program? Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2014;19:1–19. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2014/aug/caring-high-need-high-cost-patients-what-makes-successful-care. Accessed 13 March 2019.Google Scholar
- 11.Bray-Hall ST. Transitional care: focusing on patient-centered outcomes and simplicity. Ann Intern Med 2012;157(6):448–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Feltner C, Jones CD, Cene CW, Zheng ZJ, Sueta CA, Coker-Schwimmer EJ, et al. Transitional care interventions to prevent readmissions for persons with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014;160(11):774–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hayes SL, Salzberg CA, McCarthy D, Radley DC, Abrams MK, Shah T, et al. High-need, high-cost patients: who are they and how do they use health care? a population-based vomparison of demographics, health care use, and expenditures. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2016;26:1–14.Google Scholar
- 22.Kripalani S, Roumie CL, Dalal AK, Cawthon C, Businger A, Eden SK, et al. Effect of a pharmacist intervention on clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012;157(1):1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Walker DG, Aedo C, Albala C, Allen E, Dangour AD, Elbourne D, et al. Methods for economic evaluation of a factorial-design cluster randomised controlled trial of a nutrition supplement and an exercise programme among healthy older people living in Santiago, Chile: the CENEX study. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Phatak A, Prusi R, Ward B, Hansen LO, Williams MV, Vetter E, et al. Impact of pharmacist involvement in the transitional care of high-risk patients through medication reconciliation, medication education, and postdischarge call-backs (IPITCH Study). J Hosp Med 2016;11(1):39–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Altfeld S, Pavie K, Rosenberg W, Shure I. Integrating care across settings: the Illinois Transitional Care Consortium’s Bridge Model. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging; 2013 [cited 2017 June 2]. Available at: http://www.asaging.org/blog/integrating-care-across-settings-illinois-transitional-care-consortium%E2%80%99s-bridge-model. Accessed 12 March 2019.
- 32.Health Resources Administration. HRSA Data Warehouse MUA Find: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2017 [cited 2017 June 9]. Available from: https://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/tools/analyzers/muafind.aspx.
- 33.QSource. A regional call to action on transitions of care: Memphis: QSource; 2011; p 8.Google Scholar
- 35.Bailey JE, Binkley BL. Using the SafeMed model to improve transitions of care. Practice Transformation Series [Internet]. 2016; 2017(May 16). Available at: https://www.stepsforward.org/modules/safemed-transition-care. Accessed 12 March 2019
- 37.Oster A, Bindman AB. Emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: insights into preventable hospitalizations. Med Care 2003;41(2):198–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000045021.70297.9F.Google Scholar
- 38.National Quality Forum. Measures, Reports & Tools; [cited 2017 July 23]. Available from: http://www.qualityforum.org/Measures_Reports_Tools.aspx. Accessed 12 March 2019
- 39.Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, Lee JL, Jan SA, Brookhart MA, et al. Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manag Care 2009;15(7):457–64.Google Scholar
- 40.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Prevention quality overall composite technical specifications, Prevention Quality Indicator 90 (PQI 90), AHRQ Quality Indicators™, Version 6.02016 May 31, 2017. Available at: www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/Modules/PQI/V60-ICD10/TechSpecs/PQI_90_Prevention_Quality_Overall_Composite.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2019.
- 42.Research Data Assistance Center. Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility code - January: ResDAC; 2016 [cited 2017 June 1]. Available at: https://www.resdac.org/cms-data/variables/Dual-Status-Code-occurs-12-times. Accessed 12 March 2019
- 43.ICD-9-CM Enhanced Charlson SAS code. Winnepeg, Canada: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; 2006.Google Scholar
- 49.Durfee J, Johnson T, Batal H, Long J, Rinehart D, Everhart R, et al. The impact of tailored intervention services on charges and mortality for adult super-utilizers. Healthc (Amst). 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.08.004.
- 53.Eaddy MT, Cook CL, O’Day K, Burch SP, Cantrell CR. How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review. P T 2012;37(1):45–55.Google Scholar