Reflections on Diagnosis and Diagnostic Errors: a Survey of Internal Medicine Resident and Attending Physicians
More than three years since the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) report “Improving Diagnosis in Health Care,” providers and educators are still trying to understand why diagnostic errors occur and how to reduce them.1 In this survey study, internal medicine physicians share insights on how they make diagnoses and approach diagnostic error.
From June 2016 through March 2017, we surveyed 484 residents and attendings from nine Connecticut internal medicine training programs. Surveys (electronic or paper) included single-answer, multiple choice questions about frequency of diagnostic uncertainty, diagnostic errors and considering harms and benefits of diagnostic testing (every patient, ≥ 2 times per day, once daily, ≥ 2 times per week, once weekly, once per month, and never), source of diagnostic errors (access, history, physical, testing, assessment, referral, follow-up), factors negatively impacting diagnosis (time, electronic health record and patient factors:...
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016.Google Scholar