Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1330–1333 | Cite as

Time to End Physician Sexual Abuse of Patients: Calling the U.S. Medical Community to Action

  • Azza AbuDaggaEmail author
  • Michael Carome
  • Sidney M. Wolfe
Perspective

Abstract

Despite the strict prohibition against all forms of sexual relations between physicians and their patients, some physicians cross this bright line and abuse their patients sexually. The true extent of sexual abuse of patients by physicians in the U.S. health care system is unknown. An analysis of National Practitioner Data Bank reports of adverse disciplinary actions taken by state medical boards, peer-review sanctions by institutions, and malpractice payments shows that a very small number of physicians have faced “reportable” consequences for this unethical behavior. However, physician self-reported data suggest that the problem occurs at a higher rate. We discuss the factors that can explain why such sexual abuse of patients is a persistent problem in the U.S. health care system. We implore the medical community to begin a candid discussion of this problem and call for an explicit zero-tolerance standard against sexual abuse of patients by physicians. This standard must be coupled with regulatory, institutional, and cultural changes to realize its promise. We propose initial recommendations toward that end.

KEY WORDS

medical board sexual abuse sexual misconduct National Practitioner Data Bank zero tolerance 

Notes

Author Contributions

All authors take responsibility for the integrity of this perspective: All authors conceived it; AbuDagga prepared the first draft; and AbuDagga, Carome, and Wolfe critically revised it. The authors thank Fiona Lynn, MPS, managing editor of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, for her work on editing this article, and thank Dr. Robert E. Oshel (Retired Associate Director for Research and Disputes, Division of Practitioner Data Banks, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) for his in-kind contribution to their work on physician sexual abuse and for reviewing early drafts of this perspective.

Funding

Funding was provided by Public Citizen Foundation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1991;266(19):2741–2745.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Government of Ontario. Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18. (Currency date: November 1, 2018). https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/91r18/v6. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  3. 3.
    Dubois JM, Walsh HA, Chibnall JT, et al. Sexual violation of patients by physicians: A mixed-methods, exploratory analysis of 101 cases [published online June 19, 2017]. Sex Abuse.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217712217. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  4. 4.
    Dehlendorf CE, Wolfe SM. Physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses. JAMA. 1998;279(23):1883–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AbuDagga A, Wolfe SM, Carome M, Oshel RE. Cross-sectional analysis of the 1039 U.S. physicians reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank for sexual misconduct, 2003–2013. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alam A, Klemensberg J, Griesman J, Bell CM. The characteristics of physicians disciplined by professional colleges in Canada. Open Med. 2011;5(4):e166-e172.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bayer T, Coverdale J, Chiang E. A national survey of physicians’ behaviors regarding sexual contact with patients. South Med J. 1996;89(10):977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell EG, Regan S, Gruen R, et al. Professionalism in medicine: results of a national survey of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(11):795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Federation of State Medical Boards. Position statement on duty to report. https://www.fsmb.org/globalassets/advocacy/policies/position-statement-on-duty-to-report.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  10. 10.
    Moktadier A. Sexual abuse in hospitals is more common than you think. https://www.vix.com/en/health/525583/sexual-abuse-in-hospitals-is-more-common-than-you-think. Published 2018. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  11. 11.
    Sakal M. Misconduct claims against doctors raise concerns. East Valley Tribune. http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/mesa/misconduct-claims-against-doctors-raise-concerns/article_6e720470-8ba7-11df-9419-001cc4c002e0.html. Published July 11, 2010. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  12. 12.
    Bovbjerg RR, Josephine G. State Discipline of Physicians: Assessing State Medical Boards Through Case Studies. Washington, D.C: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hart A. AJC doctors & sex abuse investigation sparks improved patient protection. AJC. http://doctors.ajc.com/impact/. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  14. 14.
    Medical Council of New Zealand. Sexual boundaries in the doctor-patient relationship. https://www.mcnz.org.nz/assets/News-and-Publications/2018-Review/2018-ReviewConsultation-Appendix-IDraft-statementSexual-boundaries.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  15. 15.
    Federation of State Medical Boards. Addressing sexual boundaries: Guidelines for state medical boards. https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/policies/grpol_sexual-boundaries.pdf. Published 2006. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  16. 16.
    Pimienta AL, Giblon RE. The case for medical chaperones. Fam Pract Manag. 2018;25(5):6–8.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 373: Sexual misconduct. Obs Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):441–444.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azza AbuDagga
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Carome
    • 1
  • Sidney M. Wolfe
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Research GroupPublic CitizenWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations