Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1228–1235 | Cite as

Primary Care Physicians’ Perceived Barriers to Nephrology Referral and Co-management of Patients with CKD: a Qualitative Study

  • Raquel C. GreerEmail author
  • Yang Liu
  • Kerri Cavanaugh
  • Clarissa Jonas Diamantidis
  • Michelle M. Estrella
  • C. John Sperati
  • Sandeep Soman
  • Khaled Abdel-Kader
  • Varun Agrawal
  • Laura C. Plantinga
  • Jane O. Schell
  • James F. Simon
  • Joseph A. Vassalotti
  • Bernard G. Jaar
  • Michael J. Choi
  • On behalf of the National Kidney Foundation Education Committee
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Effective co-management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) between primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists is increasingly recognized as a key strategy to ensure the delivery of efficient and high-quality CKD care. However, the co-management of patients with CKD remains suboptimal.

Objective

We aimed to identify PCPs’ perceptions of key barriers and facilitators to effective co-management of patients with CKD at the PCP-nephrology interface.

Study Design

Qualitative study

Setting and Participants

Community-based PCPs in four US cities: Baltimore, MD; St. Louis, MO; Raleigh, NC; and San Francisco, CA

Approach

We conducted four focus groups of PCPs. Two members of the research team coded transcribed audio-recorded interviews and identified major themes.

Key Results

Most of the 32 PCPs (59% internists and 41% family physicians) had been in practice for > 10 years (97%), spent ≥ 80% of their time in clinical care (94%), and practiced in private (69%) or multispecialty group practice (16%) settings. PCPs most commonly identified barriers to effective co-management of patients with CKD focused on difficulty developing working partnerships with nephrologists, including (1) lack of timely adequate information exchange (e.g., consult note not received or CKD care plan unclear); (2) unclear roles and responsibilities between PCPs and nephrologists; and (3) limited access to nephrologists (e.g., unable to obtain timely consultations or easily contact nephrologists with concerns). PCPs expressed a desire for “better communication tools” (e.g., shared electronic medical record) and clear CKD care plans to facilitate improved PCP-nephrology collaboration.

Conclusions

Interventions facilitating timely adequate information exchange, clear delineation of roles and responsibilities between PCPs and nephrologists, and greater access to specialist advice may improve the co-management of patients with CKD.

KEY WORDS

chronic kidney disease primary care nephrology co-management qualitative research 

Notes

Funders

This work was supported by the National Kidney Foundation of Maryland, the National Kidney Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health grant K23DK094975 (Greer), K23DK090304 (Abdel-Kader), and R01DK103935-01A1 (Cavanaugh). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Renal Data System. USRDS 2016 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. The National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease Bethesda, MD. 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Guthrie B, et al. Comorbidity as a driver of adverse outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;88:859–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor EF, Lake T, Nysenbaum J, Perterson G, Meyers D. Coordinating care in the medical neighborhood: critical components and available mechanisms. White Paper (Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research under Contract No. HHSA290200900019I TO2). AHRQ Publication No. 11-0064. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Samal L, Wright A, Waikar SS, Linder JA. Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. BMC Nephrol 2015;16:162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney International. 2013:1–150.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones C, Roderick P, Harris S, Rogerson M. An evaluation of a shared primary and secondary care nephrology service for managing patients with moderate to advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47:103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haley WE, Beckrich AL, Sayre J, et al. Improving Care Coordination Between Nephrology and Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Initiative Using the Renal Physicians Association Toolkit. Am J Kidney Dis 2015;65:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levin A, Hemmelgarn B, Culleton B, et al. Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease. CMAJ 2008;179:1154–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diamantidis CJ, Powe NR, Jaar BG, Greer RC, Troll MU, Boulware LE. Primary care-specialist collaboration in the care of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:334–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Malley AS, Reschovsky JD. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:56–65.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pham HH, O’Malley AS, Bach PB, Saiontz-Martinez C, Schrag D. Primary care physicians’ links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greer RC, Ameling JM, Cavanaugh KL, et al. Specialist and primary care physicians’ views on barriers to adequate preparation of patients for renal replacement therapy: a qualitative study. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greer RC, Crews DC, Boulware LE. Challenges perceived by primary care providers to educating patients about chronic kidney disease. J Ren Care. 2012;38:174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greer RC, Cooper LA, Crews DC, Powe NR, Boulware LE. Quality of patient-physician discussions about CKD in primary care: a cross-sectional study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:583–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3th ed. Washington, DC: SAGE Publication.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lo C, Teede H, Ilic D, et al. Identifying health service barriers in the management of co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease in primary care: a mixed-methods exploration. Fam Pract 2016;33:492–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prouty CD, Mazor KM, Greene SM, et al. Providers’ perceptions of communication breakdowns in cancer care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:1122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dossett LA, Hudson JN, Morris AM, et al. The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:156–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drawz PE, Archdeacon P, McDonald CJ, et al. CKD as a Model for Improving Chronic Disease Care through Electronic Health Records. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:1488–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Navaneethan SD, Jolly SE, Sharp J, et al. Electronic health records: a new tool to combat chronic kidney disease? Clin Nephrol. 2013;79:175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zimmerman DL, Selick A, Singh R, Mendelssohn DC. Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists, family physicians and patients with kidney failure toward primary care delivery for chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pham HH. Good neighbors: How will the patient-centered medical home relate to the rest of the health-care delivery system? J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:630–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beaulieu M, Levin A. Analysis of multidisciplinary care models and interface with primary care in management of chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29:467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen AH, Yee HF Jr. Improving primary care-specialty care communication: lessons from San Francisco’s safety net: comment on “Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians”. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:65–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, et al. Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21:323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen AH, Kushel MB, Grumbach K, Yee HF Jr. Practice profile. A safety-net system gains efficiencies through ‘eReferrals’ to specialists. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:969–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Kidney Disease Education Program. Collaborate with a Nephrologist. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-communication-programs/nkdep/identify-manage/manage-patients/nephrologist/Pages/nephrologist.aspx. Accessed 2 November 2018.
  30. 30.
    Mendu ML, McMahon GM, Licurse A, Solomon S, Greenberg J, Waikar SS. Electronic Consultations in Nephrology: Pilot Implementation and Evaluation. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;68:821–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keely E, Li J, Magner P, Afkham A, Liddy C. Nephrology eConsults for Primary Care Providers: Original Investigation. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:2054358117753619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tuot DS, Murphy EJ, McCulloch CE, Leeds K, Chan E, Chen AH. Leveraging an electronic referral system to build a medical neighborhood. Healthc (Amst) 2015;3:202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gupte G, Vimalananda V, Simon SR, DeVito K, Clark J, Orlander JD. Disruptive Innovation: Implementation of Electronic Consultations in a Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4:e6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Renal Physicians Association. Advanced CKD Patient Management Toolkit. http://www.renalmd.org/page/AdvancedCKDToolkit. Accessed 2 November 2018.
  35. 35.
    Lee MS, Ray KN, Mehrotra A, Giboney P, Yee HF Jr, Barnett ML. Primary Care Practitioners’ Perceptions of Electronic Consult Systems: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:782–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carrier E, Dowling MK, Pham HH. Care coordination agreements: barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18:e398–404.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    American College of Physicians. The Patient-Centered Medical Home Neighbor: The Interface of the Patient-Centered Medical Home with Specialty/Subspecialty Practices. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. 2010.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mendu ML, Waikar SS, Rao SK. Kidney Disease Population Health Management in the Era of Accountable Care: A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing Care Across the CKD Spectrum. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70:122–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1–266.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sperati CJ, Soman S, Agrawal V, et al. Primary Care Physicians’ Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27: 840A.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Abdel-Kader K, Greer RC, Boulware LE, Unruh ML. Primary care physicians’ familiarity, beliefs, and perceived barriers to practice guidelines in non-diabetic CKD: a survey study. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Manca D, Varnhagen S, Brett-MacLean P, Allan GM, Szafran O. Respect from specialists: concerns of family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:1434–5.e14355.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Williams KM, Kirsh S, Aron D, et al. Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration’s Specialty Care Transformational Initiatives to Promote Patient-Centered Delivery of Specialty Care: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Telemed J E Health 2017;23:577–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kane CK. Policy Research Perspectives: Updated Data on Physician Practice Arrangements: Physician Ownership Drops Below 50 Percent 2017. Accessed 2 November 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raquel C. Greer
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yang Liu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kerri Cavanaugh
    • 4
    • 5
  • Clarissa Jonas Diamantidis
    • 6
  • Michelle M. Estrella
    • 7
  • C. John Sperati
    • 8
  • Sandeep Soman
    • 9
  • Khaled Abdel-Kader
    • 4
    • 5
  • Varun Agrawal
    • 10
  • Laura C. Plantinga
    • 11
    • 12
  • Jane O. Schell
    • 13
  • James F. Simon
    • 14
  • Joseph A. Vassalotti
    • 15
    • 16
  • Bernard G. Jaar
    • 1
    • 8
    • 17
    • 18
  • Michael J. Choi
    • 8
  • On behalf of the National Kidney Foundation Education Committee
  1. 1.The Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical ResearchBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Johns Hopkins Medicine International, Johns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Vanderbilt Center for Kidney DiseaseVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  5. 5.The Division of NephrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  6. 6.Divisions of General Internal Medicine and NephrologyDuke University School of MedicineDurhamUSA
  7. 7.Kidney Health Research Collaborative, Department of MedicineKidney Health Research Collaborative, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco VA Health Care SystemSan FranciscoUSA
  8. 8.Division of Nephrology, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  9. 9.Division of Nephrology and HypertensionHenry Ford HospitalDetroitUSA
  10. 10.Division of Nephrology and HypertensionUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  11. 11.Department of MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  12. 12.Department of EpidemiologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  13. 13.Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Renal-Electrolyte University of Pittsburgh School of MedicineUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  14. 14.Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urologic and Kidney InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  15. 15.National Kidney FoundationNew YorkUSA
  16. 16.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  17. 17.Nephrology Center of MarylandBaltimoreUSA
  18. 18.The Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research InstitutionsBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations