Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 699–704 | Cite as

A National Survey of Undergraduate Clinical Education in Internal Medicine

  • Amber T. PincavageEmail author
  • Mark J. Fagan
  • Nora Y. Osman
  • Debra S. Leizman
  • Deborah DeWaay
  • Camilla Curren
  • Nadia Ismail
  • Karen Szauter
  • Michael Kisielewski
  • Amy W. Shaheen
Article

Abstract

Background

In the present milieu of rapid innovation in undergraduate medical education at US medical schools, the current structure and composition of clinical education in Internal Medicine (IM) is not clear.

Objective

To describe the current composition of undergraduate clinical education structure in IM.

Design

National annual Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) cross-sectional survey.

Participants

One hundred twenty-nine clerkship directors at all Liaison Committee on Medical Education accredited US medical schools with CDIM membership as of September 1, 2017.

Main Measures

IM core clerkship and post-core clerkship structure descriptions, including duration, educational models, inpatient experiences, ambulatory experiences, and requirements.

Key Results

The survey response rate was 83% (107/129). The majority of schools utilized one core IM clerkship model (67%) and continued to use a traditional block model for a majority of their students (84%). Overall 26% employed a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship model and 14% employed a shared block model for some students. The mean inpatient duration was 7.0 ± 1.7 weeks (range 3–11 weeks) and 94% of clerkships stipulated that students spend some inpatient time on general medicine. IM-specific ambulatory experiences were not required for students in 65% of IM core clerkship models. Overall 75% of schools did not require an advanced IM clinical experience after the core clerkship; however, 66% of schools reported a high percentage of students (> 40%) electing to take an IM sub-internship. About half of schools (48%) did not require overnight call or night float during the clinical IM sub-internship.

Conclusions

Although there are diverse core IM clerkship models, the majority of IM core clerkships are still traditional block models. The mean inpatient duration is 7 weeks and 65% of IM core clerkship models did not require IM-specific ambulatory education.

KEY WORDS

undergraduate medical education clerkship internal medicine clerkship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the CDIM Survey and Scholarship Committee, CDIM Council members, and all CDIM members.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The survey protocol was granted full institutional review board exempt status from the University of North Carolina Office of Human Research Ethics.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2019_4892_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 29.5 kb)
11606_2019_4892_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 12.7 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand Projections from 2016 to 2030. Final Report. March 2018. Prepared for Association of American Medical Colleges. Submitted by IHS Markit Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A Word from the President: Facing the Facts About the Physician Shortage. AAMC Reporter: December 2013. https://www.amc.org/about/leadership/kirch-word-from-president/363844/word.html. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  3. 3.
    Applicants and Matriculants (2018). AAMC data from 2008–2017. https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/applicantmatriculant/. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  4. 4.
    LCME: Functions and Structure of a Medical School. 2017. Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree. http://lcme.org/publications/. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  5. 5.
    Cooke M, Irby D, Sullivan W, Ludmerer K. American Medical Education 100 years after the Flexner Report. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(13):1339–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Medical Teacher. 2015, 37:312–322.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kevin Krane, MD. Curriculum Inventory in Context. https://www.aamc.org/download/464758/data/ciic03-1jan2016 January 2016 Volume 3, Issue 1. P 1–3. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  8. 8.
    AAMC. The Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Entering Residency. 2014. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/coreepas/publicationsandpresentations. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  9. 9.
    Bowen JL, Irby DM. Assessing quality and costs of education in the ambulatory setting: a review of the literature. Acad Med. 2002; 77(7):621–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levinsky NG. A survey of changes in the proportions of ambulatory training in internal medicine clerkships and residencies from 1986–87 to 1996–97. Acad Med.1998; 73(10):1114–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosebraugh CJ, Szauter K, Ainsworth MA, Solomon DJ, Speer AJ, DiPette DJ. Creating and evaluating an independent ambulatory internal medicine clerkship. Am J Med Sci. 1998;315(1):30–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaheen A, Papp KK, Torre D. The internal medicine clerkship and ambulatory learning experiences: results of the 2010 clerkship directors in internal medicine survey. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(3):225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hirsh DA, Ogur B, Thibault GE, Cox M. “Continuity” as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):858–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hauer KE, O'Brien B, Poncelet AN. Longitudinal, integrated clerkship education: better for learners and patients. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norris TE, Schaad DC, DeWitt D, Ogur B, Hunt DD, Consortium of Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships. Longitudinal integrated clerkships for medical students: an innovation adopted by medical schools in Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United States. Acad Med. 2009; 84(7):902–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hirsh DA, Holmboe ES, ten Cate O. Time to trust: longitudinal integrated clerkships and entrustable professional activities. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):201–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hemmer PA, Ibrahim T, Durning SJ. The impact of increasing medical school class size on clinical clerkships: A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):432–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vu TR, Angus SV, Aronowitz PB, Harrell HE, Levine MA, Carbo A, Whelton S, Ferris A, Appelbaum JS, McNeill DB, Ismail NJ, Elnicki DM. The internal medicine subinternship- now more important than ever: a joint CDIM-APDIM position paper. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30: 1369–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sklar DS. Making the fourth year more meaningful. Acad Med. 2014; 89: 527–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cosgrove EM, Ryan MJ, Wenrich MD. Empowering fourth-year medical students: the value of the senior year. Acad Med. 2014; 89(4): 533–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stevens CD. Taking back year 4: a call to action. Acad Med. 2010; 85: 1663–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hemmer PA, Griffith C, Elnicki DM, Fagan M. The internal medicine clerkship in the clinical education of medical students. Am J Med. 2003; 115: 423–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aiyer MK, Vu TR, Ledford C, Fischer M, Durning SJ. The subinternship curriculum in internal medicine: a national survey of clerkship directors. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20(2):151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). 2017. Medical School Directory. http://lcme.org/directory. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  26. 26.
    U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/reference.html Accessed January 29, 2019.
  27. 27.
    Barzansky B, Etzel SI. Educational Programs in US Medical Schools, 2002-2003. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fazio SB, Chheda S, Hingle S, Lo MC, Meade L, Blanchard M, Hoellein A, Brandenburg S, Denton GD. The Challenges of Teaching Ambulatory Internal Medicine: Faculty Recruitment, Retention, and Development: An AAIM/SGIM Position Paper. Am J Med. 2017;130(1):105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Christner JG, Dallaghan GB, Briscoe G, Casey P, Fincher RM, Manfred LM, Margo KI, Muscarella P, Richardson JE, Safdieh J, Steiner BD. The Community Preceptor Crisis: Recruiting and Retaining Community-Based Faculty to Teach Medical Students-A Shared Perspective From the Alliance for Clinical Education. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(3):329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sidlow R. The Structure and Content of the medical subinternship: a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 550–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lyss-Lerman P, Teherani A, Aargard E, Loeser H, Cooke M, Harper GM. What training is needed in the fourth year of medical school? Views of resident program directors. Acad Med. 2009; 84: 823–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pereira AG, Harrell HE, Weissman A, Smith CD, Dupras D, Kane GC. Important skills for internship and the fourth-year medical school courses to acquire them: a national survey of internal medicine residents. Acad Med. 2016; 91: 821–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goren EN, Leizman DS, La Rochelle J, Kogan JR. Overnight Hospital Experiences for Medical Students: Results of the 2014 Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine National Survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30(9): 1245–1250. Published online 2015 Jul 15. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3405-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Oshimura JM, Sperring J, Bauer BD, Carroll AE, Rauch DA. Changes in inpatient staffing following implementation of new residency work hours. J Hosp Med. 2014; 9(10):640–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    ACGME Summary of Changes to Common Program Requirements 2017. https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements/Summary-of-Proposed-Changes-to-ACGME-Common-Program-Requirements-Section-VI. Section VI.F. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  37. 37.
    Weinberger SE, Smith LG, Collier VU, Education Committee of the American College of PRedesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):927–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amber T. Pincavage
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark J. Fagan
    • 2
  • Nora Y. Osman
    • 3
  • Debra S. Leizman
    • 4
  • Deborah DeWaay
    • 5
  • Camilla Curren
    • 6
  • Nadia Ismail
    • 7
  • Karen Szauter
    • 8
  • Michael Kisielewski
    • 9
  • Amy W. Shaheen
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineAlpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineUniversity Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandUSA
  5. 5.Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  6. 6.Department of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusUSA
  7. 7.Department of MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  8. 8.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA
  9. 9.Alliance for Academic Internal MedicineAlexandriaUSA
  10. 10.Department of Internal MedicineThe University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations