How Have 30-Day Readmission Penalties Affected Racial Disparities in Readmissions?: an Analysis from 2007 to 2014 in Five US States
Thirty-day readmission penalties implemented with the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) place a larger burden on safety-net hospitals which treat a disproportionate share of racial minorities, leading to concerns that already large racial disparities in readmissions could widen.
To examine whether there were changes in Black-White disparities in 30-day readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), or pneumonia following the passage and implementation of HRRP, and to compare disparities across safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.
Repeated cross-sectional analysis, stratified by safety-net status.
1,745,686 Medicare patients over 65 discharged alive from hospitals in 5 US states: NY, FL, NE, WA, and AR.
Odds ratios comparing 30-day readmission rates following an index admission for AMI, CHF, or pneumonia for Black and White patients between 2007 and 2014.
Prior to the passage of HRRP in 2010, Black and White readmission rates and disparities in readmissions were decreasing. These reductions were largest at safety-net hospitals. In 2007, Blacks had 13% higher odds of readmission if treated in safety-net hospitals, compared with 5% higher odds in 2010 (P < 0.05). These trends continued following the passage of HRRP.
Prior to HRRP, there were large reductions in Black-White disparities in readmissions at safety-net hospitals. Although HRRP tends to assess higher penalties for safety-net hospitals, improvements in readmissions have not reversed following the implementation of HRRP. In contrast, disparities continue to persist at non-safety-net hospitals which face much lower penalties.
KEY WORDShealth policy disparities Medicare hospital medicine
This study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS023783).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Kaplan previously served as a co-investigator on a research contract funded by AbbVie Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Waters has provided expert testimony for several health care providers. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 6.Carey K, Lin M-Y. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: safety-net hospitals show improvement, modifications to penalty formula still needed. Health Aff. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0537.
- 12.Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID). In: Quality AfHRa, ed. Rockville, MD2007–2014.Google Scholar
- 13.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Readmissions Reduction Program. 2014; http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program.html. Accessed December 4, 2018.
- 14.Horwitz L, Partovian C, Lin Z, et al. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Planned Readmission Algorithm—Version 2.1. In:2015.Google Scholar
- 16.Glass D, Lisk C, Stensland J. Refining the hospital readmissions reduction program. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. 2012.Google Scholar
- 18.Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998:8–27.Google Scholar
- 22.Salerno AM, Horwitz LI, Kwon JY, et al. Trends in readmission rates for safety-net hospitals and non-safety-net hospitals in the era of the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: a retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from 2008 to 2015. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e016149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Jacobson G, Damico A, Neuman T, Gold M. Medicare Advantage 2015 spotlight: enrollment market update. Issue Brief, Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation files http://files.kff.org/attachment/issue-brief-medicare-advantage-2015-spotlight-enrollment-market-update. 2015. Accessed December 4, 2018.