Advertisement

Imprinting on Clinical Rotations: Multisite Survey of High- and Low-Value Medical Student Behaviors and Relationship with Healthcare Intensity

  • Andrea N. Leep HunderfundEmail author
  • Stephanie R. Starr
  • Liselotte N. Dyrbye
  • Elizabeth G. Baxley
  • Jed D. Gonzalo
  • Bonnie M. Miller
  • Paul George
  • Helen K. Morgan
  • Bradley L. Allen
  • Ari Hoffman
  • Tonya L. Fancher
  • Jay Mandrekar
  • Darcy A. Reed
Article

Abstract

Background

Physician behaviors are important to high-value care, and the learning environment medical students encounter on clinical clerkships may imprint their developing practice patterns.

Objectives

To explore potential imprinting on clinical rotations by (a) describing high- and low-value behaviors among medical students and (b) examining relationships with regional healthcare intensity (HCI).

Design

Multisite cross-sectional survey

Participants

Third- and fourth-year students at nine US medical schools

Main Measures

Survey items measured high-value (n = 10) and low-value (n = 9) student behaviors. Regional HCI was measured using Dartmouth Atlas End-of-Life Chronic Illness Care data (ratio of physician visits per decedent compared with the US average, hospital care intensity index, ratio of medical specialty to primary care physician visits per decedent). Associations between regional HCI and student behaviors were examined using unadjusted and adjusted (controlling for age, sex, and year in school) logistic regression analyses, using median item ratings to summarize reported engagement in high- and low-value behaviors.

Key Results

Of 2623 students invited, 1304 (50%) responded. Many reported trying to determine healthcare costs (1085/1234, 88%), but only 45% (571/1257) reported including cost details in case presentations. Students acknowledged suggesting tests solely to anticipate what their supervisor would want (1143/1220, 94%), show off their ability to generate a broad differential diagnosis (1072/1218, 88%), satisfy curiosity (958/1217, 79%), protect the team from liability (938/1215, 77%), and build clinical experience (533/1217, 44%). Students in higher intensity regions reported significantly more low-value behaviors: each one-unit increase in the ratio of physician visits per decedent increased the odds of reporting low-value behaviors by 20% (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04–1.38; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Third- and fourth-year medical students report engaging in both high- and low-value behaviors, which are related to regional HCI. This underscores the importance of the clinical learning environment and suggests imprinting is already underway during medical school.

KEY WORDS

high-value cost-conscious care cost-conscious care undergraduate medical education medical students survey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Regional healthcare intensity data from the End-of-Life Chronic Illness Care database were obtained from The Dartmouth Atlas, which is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Dartmouth Clinical and Translational Science Institute, under award number UL1TR001086 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Funding

This study was prepared with financial support from the American Medical Association as part of the Accelerating Change in Medical Education initiative, and all participating schools received grants through this initiative (see www.changemeded.org for further details).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The institutional review board (IRB) at each participating school approved or exempted this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Gonzalo reports receiving support from the Josiah Macy Foundation, American Medical Association, and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Dr. Fancher reports support from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number UH1HP29965, Academic Units for Primary Care Training and Enhancement, for $3,741,116. This information or content and conclusions of this manuscript are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The content reflects the views of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Sirovich B, Gallagher PM, Wennberg DE, Fisher ES. Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:813–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Institute of Medicine. The Healthcare Imperative: Lowering Costs and Improving Outcomes: Workshop Series Summary. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smoldt R, Cortese D. Pay-for-performance or pay for value? Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American College of Physicians. High value care. https://hvc.acponline.org/index.html. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
  6. 6.
    Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008:27:759–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooke M. Cost consciousness in patient care--What is medical education’s responsibility? N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1253–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryskina KL, Halpern SD, Minyanou NS, Goold SD, Tilburt JC. The role of training environment care intensity in U.S. physician cost consciousness. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sirovich BE, Lipner RS, Johnston M, Holmboe ES. The association between residency training and internists’ ability to practice conservatively. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1640–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen C, Petterson S, Phillips R, Bazemore A, Mullan F. Spending patterns in region of residency training and subsequent expenditures for care provided by practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2014;312:2385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phillips RL Jr, Petterson SM, Bazemore AW, Wingrove P, Puffer JC. The effects of training institution practice costs, quality, and other characteristics on future practice. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15:140–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asch DA, Nicholson S, Srinivas S, Herrin J, Epstein AJ. Evaluating obstetrical residency programs using patient outcomes. JAMA. 2009;302:1277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dine CJ, Bellini LM, Ciemer G, et al. Assessing correlations of physicians’ practice intensity and certainty during residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7:603–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: A guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90:718–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dornan T, Tan N, Boshuizen H, et al. How and what do medical students learn in clerkships? Experience based learning (ExBL). Adv Health Sci Edu Theory Pract. 2014;19:721–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karani R, Fromme HB, Cayea D, Muller D, Schwartz A, Harris IB. How medical students learn from residents in the workplace: a qualitative study. Acad Med. 2014;89:490–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schatte DJ, Piemonte N, Clark M. “I started to feel like a ‘real doctor’”: medical students’ reflections on their psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;39:267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sirovich B, Gallagher PM, Wennberg DE, Fisher ES. Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:813–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hussey PS, Wertheimer S, Mehrotra A. The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leep Hunderfund AN, Dyrbye LN, Starr SR, et al. Role modeling and regional health care intensity: U.S. medical student attitudes toward and experiences with cost-conscious care. Acad Med. 2017;92:694–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Skochelak SE, Stack SJ. Creating the medical schools of the future. Acad Med. 2017;92:16–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lakhani A, Lass E, Silverstein WK, Born KB, Levinson W, Wong BM. Choosing Wisely for medical education: six things medical students and trainees should question. Acad Med. 2016;9:1374–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. End-of-Life Chronic Illness Care. Available at: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/tools/downloads.aspx?tab=40. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
  26. 26.
    Goodman D, Esty A, Fisher E, Chang CH. Trends and variations in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries with severe chronic illness. 2011. Available online at: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/downloads/reports/EOL_Trend_Report_0411.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
  27. 27.
    American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 8th ed. Lenexa: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Association of American Medical Colleges. U.S. medical student applications and matriculants by school, state of legal residence, and sex, 2016-2017. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/321442/data/. Accessed 9 Nov 2017.
  29. 29.
    Patel MS, Reed DA, Smith C, Arora VM. Role-modeling cost-conscious care—a national evaluation of perceptions of faculty at teaching hospitals in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1294–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lesser CS, Lucey CR, Egener B, Braddock CH 3rd, Linas SL, Levinson W. A behavioral and systems view of professionalism. JAMA. 2010;304:2732–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Levy AE, Shah NT, Moriates C, Arora VM. Fostering value in clinical practice among future physicians: time to consider COST. Acad Med. 2014;89:1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sedrak MS, Patel MS, Ziemba JB, et al. Residents’ self-report on why they order perceived unnecessary inpatient laboratory tests. J Hosp Med. 2016;11:869–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saini V, Garcia-Armesto S, Klemperer D, et al. Drivers of poor medical care. Lancet. 2017;390:178–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morgan DJ, Leppin AL, Smith CD, Korenstein D. A practical framework for understanding and reducing medical overuse: conceptualizing overuse through the patient-clinician interaction. J Hosp Med. 2017;12:346–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Emanuel EJ, Fuchs VR. The perfect storm of overutilization. JAMA. 2008;299:2789–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown SR, Brown J. Why do physicians order unnecessary preoperative tests? A qualitative study. Fam Med. 2011;43:338–43.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnston WF, Rodriguez RM, Suarez D, Fortman J. Study of medical students’ malpractice fear and defensive medicine: a “hidden curriculum?” West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jena AB, Schoemaker L, Bhattacharya J, Seabury SA. Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study. BMJ. 2015;351:h5516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Benson MK, Donovan AK, Hamm M, Zickmund S, McNeil M. The hidden curriculum in high-value care education: resident-perceived barriers to practicing high value care in a training environment [SGIM abstract 2196705]. J Gen Int Med. 2015;30(2 suppl):S274.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Benson MK. Cost-consciousness in teaching hospitals. AMA J Ethics. 2015;17:1035–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Han H, Roberts NK, Korte R. Learning in the real place: medical students’ learning and socialization in clerkships at one medical school. Acad Med. 2015;90:231–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tartaglia KM, Kman N, Ledford C. Medical student perceptions of cost-conscious care in an internal medicine clerkship: a thematic analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1491–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wiggleton C, Petrusa E, Loomis K, et al. Medical students’ experiences of moral distress: development of a web-based survey. Acad Med. 2010;85:111–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Detsky AS, Verma AA. A new model for medical education: celebrating restraint. JAMA. 2012;308:1329–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gonzalo JD, Baxley E, Borkan J, et al. Priority areas and potential solutions for successful integration and sustainment of health systems science in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92:63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Weinberger SE. Providing high-value, cost-conscious care: A critical seventh general competency for physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:386–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stammen LA, Stalmeijer RE, Paternotte E, et al. Training physicians to provide high-value, cost-conscious care: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;314:2384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sabbatini AK, Tilburt JC, Campbell EG, Sheeler RD, Egginton JS, Goold SD. Controlling health costs: Physician responses to patient expectations for medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:1234–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kronick R, Gilmer TP. Medicare and Medicaid spending variations are strongly linked within hospital regions but not at overall state level. Health Aff. 2012;31:948–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chernew ME, Sabik LM, Chandra A, Gibson TB, Newhouse JP. Geographic correlation between large-firm commercial spending and Medicare spending. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:131–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea N. Leep Hunderfund
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephanie R. Starr
    • 1
  • Liselotte N. Dyrbye
    • 1
  • Elizabeth G. Baxley
    • 2
  • Jed D. Gonzalo
    • 3
  • Bonnie M. Miller
    • 4
  • Paul George
    • 5
  • Helen K. Morgan
    • 6
  • Bradley L. Allen
    • 7
  • Ari Hoffman
    • 8
  • Tonya L. Fancher
    • 9
  • Jay Mandrekar
    • 1
  • Darcy A. Reed
    • 1
  1. 1.Mayo Clinic, NeurologyRochesterUSA
  2. 2.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  3. 3.Pennsylvania State UniversityHersheyUSA
  4. 4.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  5. 5.Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  6. 6.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  7. 7.Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  8. 8.University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  9. 9.University of California DavisSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations