Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 412–419 | Cite as

Spatial Clusters of Breast Cancer Mortality and Incidence in the Contiguous USA: 2000–2014

  • Raid W. AminEmail author
  • Bridget A. Fritsch
  • John E. Retzloff
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Clusters of breast cancer with varied incidence or mortality are known to exist. No national scale of analysis of geographical variation in breast cancer incidence has been published before for the contiguous USA.

Methods

This was a spatial cluster analysis of incidence and mortality data on breast cancer in the contiguous USA at the county resolution. Data for the years 2000–2014 were downloaded and analyzed with the software SaTScan with the goal to identify significant spatial clusters of breast cancer. Regression analysis was used to then adjust breast cancer incidence and mortality for several key risk factors such as age, smoking, particulate matter air pollution, physical inactivity, urban living, education level, and race.

Results

Spatial clusters of counties for higher than expected breast cancer incidence and also for breast cancer mortality were identified. All identified clusters have p < 0.05. The mortality clusters show the mean breast cancer rates inside the cluster, while the incidence clusters show the relative risk inside each cluster. This is the first study of the contiguous USA for breast cancer mortality and incidence together. The clustering for mortality is quite different from the clustering for incidence. Using the software JOINPOINT, it is shown that the annual US downward trend for breast cancer mortality slowed down in recent years.

Conclusions

There exist several significant clusters in the contiguous USA, both for breast cancer incidence and for breast cancer mortality. Some of the clusters persisted even after adjusting for several key risk factors. These geographic areas warrant further investigation to potentially identify additional local concerns or needs to further address female breast cancer in those specific sites.

KEY WORDS

female breast cancer incidence and mortality spatial clusters epidemiology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank each of the three reviewers and all involved Editors for their suggestions and recommendations which have made our manuscript a much better document for publication.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer stat facts: female breast cancer. National Cancer Institute. n.d.. Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  2. 2.
    Pickle LW, Mungiole M, Jones GK, et al. Atlas of United States mortality. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mokdad AH, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Fitzmaurice C, et al. Trends and patterns of disparities in cancer mortality among US counties, 1980-2014. JAMA. 2017;317(4):388–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Terry PD, Rohan TD. Cigarette Smoking and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11(10):953–971.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Danaei G, Hoorn SV, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M. Causes of cancer in the world: Comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1784–1793.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1625–1638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thune I, Brenn T, Lund E, Gaard M.. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1269–1275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A, et al. Cancer Mortality in the United States by Education Level and Race. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(18):1384–1394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freeman HP. Poverty, culture, and social injustice: Determinants of cancer disparities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(2):72–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, Labrèche F. Postmenopausal breast cancer is associated with exposure to traffic-related air pollution in Montreal, Canada: A case–control study. Environ Health Perspect, 2010;118(11):1578–1583.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hystad P, Villeneuve PJ, Goldberg MS, Crouse DL, Johnson K. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and the risk of developing breast cancer among women in eight Canadian provinces: A case–control study. Environ Int. 2015;74:240–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheehan TJ, DeChello LM, Kulldorff M, Gregorio DI, Gershman S, Mroszczyk M. The geographic distribution of breast cancer incidence in Massachusetts 1988–1997, adjusted for covariates. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen Y, Yi Q, Mao Y. Cluster of liver cancer and immigration: a geographic analysis of incidence data for Ontario 1998-2002. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7:28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulldorff M. A spatial scan statistic. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1997;26:1481–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kulldorff M, Feuer EJ, Miller BA, Freedman LS. Breast cancer clusters in the northeast United States: A geographic analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(2):161–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kulldorff M, Information Management Services, Inc. SaTScanTM v8.0: Software for the spatial and space-time scan statistics. 2009. http://www.satscan.org/. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  17. 17.
    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Data from: United States Cancer Mortality Rates by County 1980–2014 [Dataset]. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). 2017. Retrieved from http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/united-states-cancer-mortality-rates-county-1980-2014. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  18. 18.
    Srebotnjak T, Mokdad AH, Murray CJL. A novel framework for validating and applying standardized small area measurement strategies. Popul Health Metrics. 2010;8:26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kulldorff M, Huang L, Konty K. A scan statistic for continuous data based on the normal probability model. Int J Health Geogr. 2009;8:58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang L, Huang L, Tiwari R, Zuo J, Kulldorff M, Feuer E. Weighted normal spatial scan statistic for heterogeneous population data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009;104:886–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data from: Environmental Public Health Tracking Network [Dataset]. 2017. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  22. 22.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data from: Diabetes Home: County Data Indicators [Dataset]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2016. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/countydata/countydataindicators.html. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  23. 23.
    Rossen LM, Bastian B, Warner M, Khan D, Chong Y. Data from: Drug Poisoning Mortality: United States, 1999–2016 [Dataset]. Natl Center Health Stat. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-visualization/drug-poisoning-mortality. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  24. 24.
    United States Census Bureau. Data from: Historical County Level Poverty Estimates Tool [Dataset]. U. S. Census Bureau. 2018. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/time-series/demo/census-poverty-tool.html. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  25. 25.
    United States Census Bureau. Data from: Programs and Surveys [Dataset]. U. S. Census Bureau. 2016. Retrieved from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  26. 26.
    United States Census Bureau. Data from: American FactFinder [Dataset]. U. S. Census Bureau. 2010. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  27. 27.
    Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19:335–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    United States Department of Agriculture. Data from: Economic Research Service: County-level Data Sets [Dataset]. United States Department of Agriculture. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/county-level-data-sets/county-level-data-sets-download-data/. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  29. 29.
    Gregorio DI, Kulldorff M, Barry L, Samociuk H. Geographic differences in invasive and in situ breast cancer incidence according to precise geographic coordinates, Connecticut, 1991–95. Int J Cancer. 2002;100:194–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    MacKinnon JA, Duncan RC, Huang Y, Lee DJ, Fleming LE, Voti L, Rudolph M, Wilkinson JD. Detecting an Association between Socioeconomic Status and Late Stage Breast Cancer using Spatial Analysis and Area-Based Measures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16(4):756–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raid W. Amin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bridget A. Fritsch
    • 1
  • John E. Retzloff
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of West FloridaPensacolaUSA
  2. 2.Sacred Heart Health SystemPensacolaUSA

Personalised recommendations