Risk Assessment of Acute, All-Cause 30-Day Readmission in Patients Aged 65+: a Nationwide, Register-Based Cohort Study
Hospital readmission is considered an adverse health outcome in older people, adding additional pressure on clinical resources within health care services. Despite numerous studies on risk factors for readmissions, studies find different strengths of respective determinants and there is a need to explore and identify patterns of risk factors in larger cohorts.
Exploring and identifying patterns of risk factors for acute, all-cause 30-day readmission in a Danish cohort of patients aged 65+.
Register-based cohort study using individual-level linkable information on demographics, social determinants, clinical conditions, health care utilization, and provider determinants obtained from primary and secondary health care.
Historic cohort of 1,267,752 admissions in 479,854 patients, aged 65+, discharged from Danish public hospitals from January 2007 to September 2010.
We included patient-level variables and admission-level variables. Outcome was acute, all-cause 30-day readmission. Data was analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Strength of associations was analyzed using Wald test statistics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used for quantification of predictive ability. For validation, we used split-sample design.
Acute admission and number of days since previous hospital discharge were factors strongly associated with readmission. Patients at risk of future readmission suffered from comorbidity, consumed more drugs, and were frequent users of in- and outpatient health care services in the year prior to the index admission. Factors related to index admission were only weakly associated with readmission. The predictive ability was 0.709 (0.707–0.711) for acute readmission.
In a general population of older people, we found that pre-hospital factors rather than hospital factors account for increased risk of readmission and are dominant contributors to predict acute all-cause 30-day readmission. Therefore, risk for excess readmission should be shared across sectors and focus the care trajectory over time rather than distinct care episodes.
KEY WORDSdatabase health services research readmission risk assessment
This work was supported by the A.P. Moeller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science, Speciallaege Heinrich Kopps Legat, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and The Danish Nursing Research Foundation. They had no role in the design or conduct of this study. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and qualifying suggestions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was registered under the North Denmark Region’s joint notification of health research (ID 2008-58-0028).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 2.Joynt KE, Oraw EJ, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA 2011;61(2):300–1.Google Scholar
- 5.Statistics Denmark. Table AED20A https://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1293 Accessed October 10, 2018.
- 7.Stäck P, Forsberg B, Högsberg M, Werr J, Erdgren G. Risken for akut återinläggning kan förutssägas. [The risk of acute readmission can be predicted. Former care consumption patterns and certain diagnoses are strongly predictive]. Läkartidningen 2012;48(109):2211–15.Google Scholar
- 8.National handlingsplan for den ældre medicinske patient [National action plan for the aged medical patient]. Ministy of Health. Copenhagen, Denmark 2016. https://www.sum.dk/~/media/Filer%20-%20Publikationer_i_pdf/2016/Styrket-indsats-for-den-aeldre-medicinske-patient/National_Handlingsplan.pdf.Accessed October 10, 2018.
- 9.Ældre medicinske patienters kontakt med det regionale sundhedsvæsen og den kommunale pleje [Regional and municipality care services utilised by aged medical patients]. The Danish Health Data Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark 2016. http://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/~/media/DE038BC0FD884FE7A64DA908201B0194.ashx Accessed October 10, 2018.
- 23.Kjøller M, Davidsen M, Juel K. Ældrebefolkningens sundhedstilstand i Danmark -analyser baseret på Sundheds- og sygelighedsundersøgelsen 2005 og udvalgte registre [Health and wellbeing of the aging population in Denmark - analyses based on the Survey of Health and Morbidity 2005 and information from selected population based registers]. National Board of Health. 2010.Google Scholar
- 25.Vallgårda S. Addressing individual behaviors and living conditions: four Nordic public health policies. SJPH 2010; 39(Suppl): 6–10.Google Scholar
- 26.Health care in Denmark – an overview. Ministry of Health, Copenhagen, Denmark 2017. www.sum.dk. Accessed October 10, 2018.
- 27.Thygesen LC, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, Brønnum-Hansen H. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. SJPH 2011;39(suppl 7):12–16.Google Scholar
- 29.Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. SJPH 2011;39(suppl 7):30–33.Google Scholar
- 33.Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Fundamentals of epidemiologic data analysis in: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (ed). Modern epidemiology. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Williams. Philidelphia; 2008. p. 213–37.Google Scholar
- 35.Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Borsboom GJJM, Eijkemans MJC, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JDF. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54(8):774–81.Google Scholar
- 50.Juel K, Christensen K. Are men seeking medical advice too late? Contacts to general practitioners, hospital admissions in Denmark 2005. J Public Health 2007;30:111–13.Google Scholar