Changes in Health and Ability to Work Among Medicaid Expansion Enrollees: a Mixed Methods Study
Michigan expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (Healthy Michigan Plan [HMP]) to improve the health of low-income residents and the state’s economy.
To understand HMP’s impact on enrollees’ health, ability to work, and ability to seek employment
Mixed methods study, including 67 qualitative interviews and 4090 computer-assisted telephone surveys (response rate 53.7%)
Non-elderly adult HMP enrollees
Changes in health status, ability to work, and ability to seek employment
Half (47.8%) of respondents reported better physical health, 38.2% better mental health, and 39.5% better dental health since HMP enrollment. Among employed respondents, 69.4% reported HMP helped them do a better job at work. Among out-of-work respondents, 54.5% agreed HMP made them better able to look for a job. Among respondents who changed jobs, 36.9% agreed HMP helped them get a better job. In adjusted analyses, improved health was associated with the ability to do a better job at work (aOR 4.08, 95% CI 3.11–5.35, p < 0.001), seek a job (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.93–4.10, p < 0.001), and get a better job (aOR 3.20, 95% CI 1.69–6.09, p < 0.001), but not with employment status (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.30, p = 0.44). In interviews, several HMP enrollees attributed their ability to get or maintain employment to improved physical, mental, and dental health because of services covered by HMP. Remaining barriers to work cited by enrollees included older age, disability, illness, and caregiving responsibilities.
Many low-income HMP enrollees reported improved health, ability to work, and job seeking after obtaining health insurance through Medicaid expansion.
We thank the following evaluation team members for their additional contributions to survey and interview development and administration: Lisa Szymecko, JD, PhD; Cengiz Salman, MA; Tolu Olorode, MSW, MUP; Zachary Rowe, BBA; and the members of the Community Advisory Board (Adnan Hammad, Global Health Research, Management and Solutions; Lynnette LaHahnn, AuSable Valley Community Mental Health Authority; Charo Ledón, Acción Buenos Vecinos; Raymond Neff, Spectrum Health; Jennifer Raymond, Mid Michigan Community Action; George Sedlacek, Marquette County YMCA; and Ashley Tuomi, American Indian Health and Family Services). We also thank Sarah Sugar, BA, for assistance with literature review, and Helen Levy, PhD, for thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
The study was funded by a contract from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) to the University of Michigan to conduct an evaluation of the Healthy Michigan Plan, as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) through a Section 1115 Medicaid waiver.
Preliminary findings were presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, April 2017, and at the AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting, New Orleans, LA, June 2017.
The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) funded the study and approved the manuscript, but had no role in the conduct of the research, data analysis, interpretation of findings, or drafting of the manuscript. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of MDHHS.
Dr. Tipirneni is additionally supported by a K08 Clinical Scientist Development Award from the National Institute on Aging. Support was also provided to Dr. Kullgren by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service. Dr. Kullgren is a VA HSR&D Career Development awardee at the Ann Arbor VA. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Kullgren has received consulting fees from SeeChange Health and HealthMine, and a speaking honorarium from AbilTo, Inc. There are no other conflicts of interest.
- 1.Congressional Budget Office. Cost estimate: H.R. 1628, American Health Care Act of 2017. May 24, 2017. Accessed at https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/costestimate/hr1628aspassed.pdf on 4 September 2017.
- 2.Congressional Budget Office. Cost estimate: H.R. 1628, Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017. June 26, 2017. Accessed at https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52849 on 4 September 2017.
- 3.Congressional Budget Office. Preliminary analysis of legislation that would replace subsidies for health care with block grants. 2017 Sept. Accessed at https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53126 on 26 September 2017.
- 4.Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Current status of state Medicaid expansion decisions. 2017 Jan 1. Accessed at http://www.kff.org/health-reform/slide/current-status-of-the-medicaid-expansion-decision on 4 September 2017.
- 6.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS announces new policy guidance for states to test community engagement for able-bodied adults. Accessed at https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Press-releases/2018-Press-releases-items/2018-01-11.html on 22 May 2018.
- 7.Musumeci, M. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid and work requirements. 2017 Mar 23. Accessed at http://kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-and-work-requirements on 4 September 2017.
- 8.Antonisse L, Garfield R, Rudowitz R, Artiga S, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. The effects of Medicaid expansion under the ACA: updated findings from a literature review. 2017 Sept 25. Accessed at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/the-effects-of-medicaid-expansion-under-the-aca-updated-findings-from-a-literature-review on 26 September 2017.
- 9.The Colorado Health Foundation. Assessing the economic and budgetary impact of Medicaid expansion in Colorado: FY 2015–16 through FY 2034–35. 2016 Mar. Accessed at http://www.coloradohealth.org/sites/default/files/documents/2017-01/Medicaid_ExecutiveSummary_ONLINE.pdf on 4 September 2017.
- 10.Deloitte Development LLC. Commonwealth of Kentucky Medicaid expansion report 2014. 2015 Feb. Accessed at http://jointhehealthjourney.com/images/uploads/channel-files/Kentucky_Medicaid_Expansion_One-Year_Study_FINAL.pdf on 4 September 2017.
- 12.Garrett AB, Kaestner R, Gangopadhyaya A. Recent evidence on the ACA and employment: Has the ACA been a job killer? 2016 update. The Urban Institute, ACA Implementation — Monitoring and Tracking; 2017 Feb. Accessed at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2922288 on 4 September 2017.
- 14.Leung P, Mas A. Employment effects of the ACA Medicaid expansions. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 22540; 2016 Aug. Accessed at http://www.nber.org/papers/w22540.pdf on 4 September 2017.
- 16.Levy H, Buchmueller TC, Nikpay S. Health reform and retirement. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016; 2016 Sep 3.Google Scholar
- 18.Ohio Department of Medicaid. Ohio Medicaid Group VIII assessment: a report to the Ohio General Assembly. 2016. Accessed at http://medicaid.ohio.gov/portals/0/resources/reports/annual/group-viii-assessment.pdf on 4 September 2017.
- 19.Rutledge MS. The interconnected relationships of health insurance, health, and labor market outcomes. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, WP2016–2; 2016 Jul. Accessed at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2812211 on 4 September 2017.
- 20.Office of Governor Rick Snyder. Snyder making the case for Healthy Michigan at two town hall meetings. 2013 Aug 19. Accessed at http://www.michigan.gov/snyder/0,4668,7-277-57577_57657-310966%2D%2Drss,00.html on 4 September 2017.
- 22.Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2015.Google Scholar
- 23.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
- 24.The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): AAPOR; 2016. Accessed at http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf on 4 September 2017.
- 25.Lee S, Valliant R. Weighting telephone samples using propensity scores. Adv Tel Survey Methodol 2008:170–83.Google Scholar
- 26.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National health and nutrition examination survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Accessed at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm on 4 September 2017.
- 27.Center for Studying Health System Change. Health tracking household survey. 2009-10-16. Accessed at https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26001.v1 on 4 September 2017.
- 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National health interview survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Accessed at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/index.htm on 4 September 2017.
- 29.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems. Accessed at https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/index.html on 4 September 2017.
- 30.U.S. Census Bureau. American community survey. Accessed at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs on September 4, 2017.
- 32.Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research: SAGE; 2011.Google Scholar
- 37.Ku L, Brantley E.Medicaid work requirements: who’s at risk? Bethesda (MD): Health Affairs Blog; 2017 Apr 12. Accessed at http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2017/04/12/medicaid-work-requirements-whos-at-risk on 4 September 2017.
- 39.Gidengil C, Parast L, Burkhart Q, et al. Development and implementation of the family experiences with coordination of care survey quality measures. Acad Pediatr. 2017; 2017 Mar 31.Google Scholar