A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers’ Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital
Legislation requiring mammography facilities to notify women if they have dense breast tissue found on mammography has been enacted in 34 US states. The impact of dense breast notifications (DBNs) on women with limited English proficiency (LEP) is unknown.
This study sought to understand Spanish-speaking women’s experience receiving DBNs in a Massachusetts safety-net hospital.
Eligible women completed one audio-recorded, semi-structured interview via telephone with a native Spanish-speaking research assistant trained in qualitative methods. Interviews were professionally transcribed verbatim and translated. The translation was verified by a third reviewer to ensure fidelity with audio recordings.
Nineteen Spanish-speaking women ages 40–74 who received mammography with a normal result and recalled receiving a DBN.
Using the verified English transcripts, we conducted a content analysis to identify women’s perceptions and actions related to receiving the notification. A structured codebook was developed. Transcripts were independently coded and assessed for agreement with a modification of Cohen’s kappa. Content codes were grouped to build themes related to women’s perceptions and actions after receiving a DBN.
Nineteen Spanish-speaking women completed interviews. Nine reported not receiving the notification in their native language. Four key themes emerged: (1) The novelty of breast density contributed to notification-induced confusion; (2) women misinterpreted key messages in the notification; (3) varied actions were taken to seek further information; and (4) women held unrealized expectations and preferences for follow-up.
Not having previous knowledge of breast density and receiving notifications in English contributed to confusion about its meaning and inaccurate interpretations of key messages by Spanish speakers. Tools that promote understanding should be leveraged in seeking equity in risk-based breast cancer screening for women with dense breasts.
KEY WORDSlimited English proficiency breast cancer screening health policy risk perception informed decision-making
This work was supported by the Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute under Grant 1UL1TR001430. The authors would like to thank Marisol Amaya and La Alianza Hispania for their contributions to the Science Cafe and feedback on preliminary themes.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Study activities were approved by the Boston University Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 2.Elder JP, Ayala GX, Parra-Medina D, Talavera GA. Health communication in the Latino community: issues and approaches. Ann Rev Public Health. 2009;30:227–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Calderón JL, Beltrán RA. Pitfalls in Health Communication: Healthcare Policy, Institution, Structure, & Process. Medscape Gen Med. 2004;6(1):9.Google Scholar
- 7.National Standards on Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) in Health Care. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Secretary; 2000. p. 80865–79.Google Scholar
- 8.Estrada RD, Messias DK. A Scoping Review of the Literature: Content, Focus, Conceptualization and Application of the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015;26(4):1089–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2015.0134 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dense Breast Info, Inc. 2017. http://densebreast-info.org/legislation.aspx#. Accessed May 30, 2017.
- 11.Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, et al. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):268–78. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1789 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, van Ravesteyn NT, Cevik M, Alagoz O, et al. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Supplemental Ultrasonography Screening for Women With Dense BreastsSupplemental Ultrasonography Screening for Women With Dense Breasts. Ann Int Med. 2015;162(3):157–66. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0692 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Freer P, Slanetz P, Haas J, Tung N, Hughes K, Armstrong K, et al. Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(2):455–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ, Lindfors KK, et al. The California Breast Density Information Group: A Collaborative Response to the Issues of Breast Density, Breast Cancer Risk, and Breast Density Notification Legislation. Radiology. 2013;269(3):887–92. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Gunn C, Battaglia T, Paasche-Orlow M, West A, Kressin N. Women’s Perceptions of Dense Breast Notifications: “So what is that supposed to mean?”. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 (in press).Google Scholar
- 23.Becker M. The health belief model and personal health behavior Thorofare: CB Slack; 1974.Google Scholar
- 24.MAXQDA, software for qualitative data analysis. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software - Consult - Sozialforschung GmbH; 1989–2018.Google Scholar
- 25.Ando H, Cousins R, Young C. Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: development and refinement of a codebook. Compr Psychol. 2014;3(4):1–7.Google Scholar
- 27.Eccleston P, Werneke U, Armon K, Stephenson T, MacFaul R. Accounting for overlap? An application of Mezzich’s κ statistic to test interrater reliability of interview data on parental accident and emergency attendance. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(6):784–90. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01718.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Elder JP, Ayala GX, Campbell NR, Slymen D, Lopez-Madurga ET, Engelberg M, et al. Interpersonal and print nutrition communication for a Spanish-dominant Latino population: Secretos de la Buena Vida. Health Psychol. 2005;24(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6220.127.116.11 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.O’Neill SC, Leventhal KG, Scarles M, Evans CN, Makariou E, Pien E, et al. Mammographic Breast Density as a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: Awareness in a Recently Screened Clinical Sample. Women’s Health Issues. 2014;24(3):e321–e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Trinh L, Ikeda DM, Miyake KK, Trinh J, Lee KK, Dave H, et al. Patient awareness of breast density and interest in supplemental screening tests: comparison of an academic facility and a county hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(3):249–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Manning M, Purrington K, Penner L, Duric N, Albrecht TL. Between-race differences in the effects of breast density information and information about new imaging technology on breast-health decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(6):1002–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 43.Yabroff RK, Zapka J, Klabunde CN, Yuan G, Buckman DW, Haggstrom D, et al. "Systems Strategies to Support Cancer Screening in U.S. Primary Care Practice." Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev. 2011;20(12):2471–2479.Google Scholar
- 44.Schrager S and Burnside E. "Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Call for Development and Validation of Patient-Oriented Shared Decision-Making Tools." J Women's Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6775
- 45.Horny M, Cohen AB, Duszak R, Jr., Christiansen CL, Shwartz M, Burgess JF, Jr. Dense Breast Notification Laws: Impact on Downstream Imaging After Screening Mammography. Med Care Res Rev. 2018:1077558717751941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558717751941