Evaluation of the Association of Public Reporting of Patient Ratings of US Primary Care Providers with Inappropriate Care
Public sharing of patient experience scores to advance patient centeredness has gained traction but remains controversial due to concerns that this may inadvertently contribute to inappropriate care.1, 2 Starting in October 2015, at Virginia Mason Medical Center, provider-level patient satisfaction ratings and comments were displayed prominently on the institutional public website. The objectives of this study were to determine whether measures of potentially inappropriate care changed following public sharing of patient satisfaction data, and secondarily to examine the relationship between inappropriate care and provider ratings.
We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study from January 2015 to December 2017 of primary care providers who had at least 500 adult patient visits and 20 adult patient surveys both before and after the October 2015 initiation of public reporting. The intervention was public reporting of patient ratings of providers based on...
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 5.National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2016: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 1, narrative. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2015. various p.Google Scholar
- 6.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Surgeon General, Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Washington, DC: HHS, November 2016.Google Scholar