Eliminating Gender-Based Bias in Academic Medicine: More Than Naming the “Elephant in the Room”
Gender-based discrimination and bias are widespread in professional settings, including academic medicine. Overt manifestations such as sexual harassment have long been identified but attention is only more recently turning towards subtler forms of bias, including inequity in promotion and compensation. Barriers to progress vary across institutions and include lack of awareness, inadequate training, poor informational transparency, and challenging power dynamics. We propose five solutions that the academic medical community can adopt to not only name, but also address, gender-based bias as the proverbial elephant in the room: definitively identify the systemic nature of the problem, prompt those with influence and power to advance a culture of equity, broadly incorporate evidence-based explicit anti-sexist training, increase transparency of information related to professional development and compensation, and use robust research methods to study the drivers and potential solutions of gender inequity within academic medicine. While implementing these proposals is no small task, doing so is an important step in helping the academic medical community become more just.
KEY WORDSworkforce medical culture professionalism physician behavior
The authors would like to thank Dr. Katrina A. Armstrong and Dr. Judy A. Shea for their review of earlier versions of this manuscript for which they were not financially compensated.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.Report of Co-Chairs Chai R. Feldblum & Victoria A. Lipnic. Report of the Co-Chairs of the EEOC Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace.; 2016. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/upload/report.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
- 2.Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Faculty Perceptions of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(11):889. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM, Raexer CL, Sloane RA. The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathway to leadership 2013–2014. Vol 1. 2014. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/The State of Women in Academic Medicine 2013–2014 FINAL.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
- 7.Women and Medicine Task Force. Soc Gen Intern Med. 2018. http://www.sgim.org/communities/task-forces/women-and-medicine. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
- 8.Group on Women in Medicine and Science (GWIMS) - Member Center - AAMC. Am Assoc Med Coll. 2018. https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
- 9.Focus on Health & Leadership for Women. Trust Univ Pennsylvania. 2018. https://www.med.upenn.edu/focus/. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
- 13.IPE Teaching FellowsProgram | Center for Health Sciences Interprofessional Education, Research and Practice. https://collaborate.uw.edu/2017/07/ipe-teaching-fellows-program/. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
- 14.Cochran-Smith M, Lytle S, eds. Inquiry As Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teacher’s College Press; 2009.Google Scholar