The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Follow-up of tests pending at discharge (TPADs) is poor. We previously demonstrated a twofold increase in awareness of any TPAD by attendings and primary care physicians (PCPs) using an automated email intervention
To determine whether automated notification improves documented follow-up for actionable TPADs
Cluster-randomized controlled trial
Attendings and PCPs caring for adult patients discharged from general medicine and cardiology services with at least one actionable TPAD between June 2011 and May 2012
An automated system that notifies discharging attendings and network PCPs of finalized TPADs by email
The primary outcome was the proportion of actionable TPADs with documented action determined by independent physician review of the electronic health record (EHR). Secondary outcomes included documented acknowledgment, 30-day readmissions, and adjusted median days to documented follow-up.
Of the 3378 TPADs sampled, 253 (7.5%) were determined to be actionable by physician review. Of these, 150 (123 patients discharged by 53 attendings) and 103 (90 patients discharged by 44 attendings) were assigned to intervention and usual care groups, respectively, and underwent chart review. The proportion of actionable TPADs with documented action was 60.7 vs. 56.3% (p = 0.82) in the intervention vs. usual care groups, similar for documented acknowledgment. The proportion of patients with actionable TPADs readmitted within 30 days was 22.8 vs. 31.1% in the intervention vs. usual care groups (p = 0.24). The adjusted median days [95% CI] to documented action was 9 [6.2, 11.8] vs. 14 [10.2, 17.8] (p = 0.04) in the intervention vs. usual care groups, similar for documented acknowledgment. In sub-group analysis, the intervention had greater impact on documented action for patients with network PCPs compared with usual care (70 vs. 50%, p = 0.03).
Automated notification of actionable TPADs shortened time to action but did not significantly improve documented follow-up, except for network-affiliated patients. The high proportion of actionable TPADs without any documented follow-up (~ 40%) represents an ongoing safety concern.
Clinical Trials Identifier
KEY WORDStests pending at discharge patient safety health information technology
This study was supported by a grant from CRICO/Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions. The funding agency played no role in the conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Dr. Dalal had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 22.Harris M, Zalis M. QPID: building clinical applications on top of EMR semantic search. radiological society of north america 2011 scientific assembly and annual meeting, November 26–December 2, 2011. http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11012779.html. Accessed January 30, 2018.
- 23.Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.Google Scholar