Advertisement

The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination and State Medical Board Disciplinary Actions: a Population Cohort Study

  • Furman S. McDonald
  • Lauren M. Duhigg
  • Gerald K. Arnold
  • Ruth M. Hafer
  • Rebecca S. Lipner
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Some have questioned whether successful performance in the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program is meaningful. The association of the ABIM Internal Medicine (IM) MOC examination with state medical board disciplinary actions is unknown.

Objective

To assess risk of disciplinary actions among general internists who did and did not pass the MOC examination within 10 years of initial certification.

Design

Historical population cohort study.

Participants

The population of internists certified in internal medicine, but not a subspecialty, from 1990 through 2003 (n = 47,971).

Intervention

ABIM IM MOC examination.

Setting

General internal medicine in the USA.

Main Measures

The primary outcome measure was time to disciplinary action assessed in association with whether the physician passed the ABIM IM MOC examination within 10 years of initial certification, adjusted for training, certification, demographic, and regulatory variables including state medical board Continuing Medical Education (CME) requirements.

Key Results

The risk for discipline among physicians who did not pass the IM MOC examination within the 10 year requirement window was more than double than that of those who did pass the examination (adjusted HR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.83 to 2.39). Disciplinary actions did not vary by state CME requirements (adjusted HR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16), but declined with increasing MOC examination scores (Kendall’s tau-b coefficient = − 0.98 for trend, p < 0.001). Among disciplined physicians, actions were less severe among those passing the IM MOC examination within the 10-year requirement window than among those who did not pass the examination.

Conclusions

Passing a periodic assessment of medical knowledge is associated with decreased state medical board disciplinary actions, an important quality outcome of relevance to patients and the profession.

KEY WORDS

maintenance of certification MOC disciplinary action ABIM certification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the following individuals for their critical review of the manuscript: Vineet Arora, MD, MAPP; Richard J. Baron, MD; J. Taylor Hays, MD, Joseph C. Kolars, MD.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania approved the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors are employed by the American Board of Internal Medicine.

References

  1. 1.
    Baron RJ, Johnson D. The American Board of Internal Medicine: Evolving Professional Self-regulation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2014;161(3):221–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL. Specialty Board Certification in the United States: Issues and Evidence. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013(S1):20–35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norcini JJ, Kimball HR, Lipner RS. Certification and specialization: do they matter in the outcome of acute myocardial infarction? Academic Medicine: Journal Of The Association Of American Medical Colleges. 2000;75(12):1193–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fiorilli PN, Minges K, Herrin J, et al. Association of physician certification in Interventional Cardiology with in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2015;132(19):1816–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray BM, Vandergrift JL, Johnston MM, et al. Association Between Imposition of a Maintenance of Certification Requirement and Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Hospitalizations and Health Care Costs. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(22):2348–57.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holmboe ES, Wang Y, Meehan TP, et al. Association Between Maintenance of Certification Examination Scores and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008;168(13):1396–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayes J, Jackson JL, McNutt GM, Hertz BJ, Ryan JJ, Pawlikowski SA. Association between physician time-unlimited vs time-limited internal medicine board certification and ambulatory patient care quality. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2358–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook DA, Holmboe ES, Sorensen KJ, Berger RA, Wilkinson JM. Getting maintenance of certification to work: A grounded theory study of physicians’ perceptions. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(1):35–42.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iglehart JK, Baron RB. Ensuring physicians’ competence—Is maintenance of certification the answer? The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(26):2543–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drazen JM, Weinstein DF. Considering Recertification. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362(10):946–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levinson W, King TE. American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Program. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362(10):948–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cook DA, Blachman MJ, West CP, Wittich CM. Physician attitudes about Maintenance of Certification: A cross-specialty national survey. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2016;91(10):1336–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teirstein PS, Topol EJ. The role of maintenance of certification programs in governance and professionalism. JAMA. 2015;313(18):1809–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morrison J, Wickersham P. Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279(23):1889–93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papadakis MA, Arnold GK, Blank LL, Holmboe ES, Lipner RS. Performance during Internal Medicine Residency Training and Subsequent Disciplinary Action by State Licensing Boards. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;148(11):869–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lipner RS, Young A, Chaudhry HJ, Duhigg LM, Papadakis MA. Specialty Certification Status, Performance Ratings, and Disciplinary Actions of Internal Medicine Residents. Academic Medicine. 2016;91(3):376–81.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson DA, Chaudhry HJ. Medical Licensing and Discipline in America: A History of the Federation of State Medical Boards. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield; 2012.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolfe S, Williams C, Zaslow A. Public Citizen’s Health Research Group Ranking of the Rate of State Medical Boards’ Serious Disciplinary Actions, 2009–2011. 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States: Continuing Medical Education Board by Board Overview: 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hong CS, Atlas SJ, Chang Y, et al. Relationship between patient panel characteristics and primary care physician clinical performance rankings. JAMA. 2010;304(10):1107–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raffoul M, Moore M, Kamerow D, Bazemore A. A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is neither Accurate nor Reasonable. Journal Of The American Board Of Family Medicine: JABFM. 2016;29(4):496–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cassel CK. ABIM: Maintenance of Certification—For the public. 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brennan TA, Horwitz RI, Duffy FD, Cassel CK, Goode LD, Lipner RS. The Role of Physician Specialty Board Certification Status in the Quality Movement. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;292(9):1038–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fleiss J, Levin B, Paik M. Statistical Methods for Rate and Proportions. 3rd ed Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2003:125–9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, et al. Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353(25):2673–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Academic Medicine: Journal Of The Association Of American Medical Colleges. 2004;79(3):244–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hauer KE, Clauser J, Lipner RS, et al. The Internal Medicine Reporting Milestones: Cross-sectional Description of Initial Implementation in U.S. Residency Programs. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016;165(5):356–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McDonald F, Zeger S, Kolars J. Factors associated with medical knowledge acquisition during internal medicine residency. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2007;22(7):962–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McDonald F, Zeger S, Kolars J. Associations of conference attendance with internal medicine in-training examination scores. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2008;83(4):449–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCoy CP, Stenerson MB, Halvorsen AJ, Homme JH, McDonald FS. Association of volume of patient encounters with residents’ in-training examination performance. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2013;28(8):1035–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cuddy M, Young A, Gelman A, et al. Exploring the relationships between USMLE performance and disciplinary action in practice: A validity study of score inferences from a licensure examination. Academic Medicine. 2017;92(12):178–85.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aboud KA, Ramesh V. Continuing Medical Education (CME): A reappraisal. Canadian Medical Education Journal. 2011;2(2):e91-e3.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ahmed K, Wang TT, Ashrafian H, Layer GT, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. The effectiveness of continuing medical education for specialist recertification. Canadian Urological Association Journal—Journal De L’association Des Urologues Du Canada. 2013;7(7–8):266–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Balmer JT. The transformation of continuing medical education (CME) in the United States. Advances in Medical Education & Practice. 2013;4:171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bylsma W, Arnold GK, Fortna GS, Lipner R. Where have all the general internists gone? Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010;25(10):1020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lipner RS, Bylsma WH, Arnold GK, Fortna GS, Tooker J, Cassel CK. Who Is Maintaining Certification in Internal Medicine--and Why? A National Survey 10 Years after Initial Certification. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144(1):29–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Casalino LP, Pesko MF, Ryan AM, et al. Small Primary Care Physician Practices Have Low Rates Of Preventable Hospital Admissions. Health Affairs. 2014;33(9):1680–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kralewski J, Dowd B, Knutson D, Tong J, Savage M. The relationships of physician practice characteristics to quality of care and costs. Health Services Research. 2015;50(3):710–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pineault R, Provost S, Borgès Da Silva R, Breton M, Levesque J-F. Why Is Bigger Not Always Better in Primary Health Care Practices? The Role of Mediating Organizational Factors. Inquiry: A Journal Of Medical Care Organization, Provision And Financing. 2016;53.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shortell SM, Schmittdiel J, Wang MC, et al. An Empirical Assessment of High-Performing Medical Groups: Results from a National Study. Medical Care Research & Review. 2005;62(4):407–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lipner RS, Bylsma WH, Arnold GK, Fortna GS, Tooker J, Cassel CK.  Who is maintaining certification in internal medicine -- and why?  A national survey 10 years after initial certification. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144(1):29–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Furman S. McDonald
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Lauren M. Duhigg
    • 1
  • Gerald K. Arnold
    • 1
  • Ruth M. Hafer
    • 1
  • Rebecca S. Lipner
    • 1
  1. 1.American Board of Internal MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Adjunct Professor of MedicineMayo Clinic College of Medicine and ScienceRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Clinical Associate of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.J. Edwin Wood ClinicPennsylvania HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations