Women’s Healthcare Utilization Following Routine Screening for Past-Year Intimate Partner Violence in the Veterans Health Administration
Experience of intimate partner violence (IPV) can have adverse health impacts and has been associated with elevated rates of healthcare service utilization. Healthcare encounters present opportunities to identify IPV-related concerns and connect patients with services. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) conducts IPV screening within an integrated healthcare system.
The objectives of this study were to compare service utilization in the 6 months following IPV screening between those screening positive and negative for past-year IPV (IPV+, IPV−) and to examine the timing and types of healthcare services accessed among women screening IPV+.
A retrospective chart review was conducted for 8888 female VHA patients across 13 VHA facilities who were screened for past-year IPV between April 2014 and April 2016.
Demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, marital status, veteran status), IPV screening response, and healthcare encounters (based on visit identification codes).
In the 6 months following routine screening for past-year IPV, patients screening IPV+ were more likely to utilize outpatient care (aOR = 1.85 [CI 1.26, 2.70]), including primary care or psychosocial care, and to have an inpatient stay (aOR = 2.09 [CI 1.23, 3.57]), compared with patients screening IPV−. Among those with any utilization, frequency of outpatient encounters within the 6-month period following screening was higher among those screening IPV+ compared with those screening IPV−. The majority of patients screening positive for past-year IPV returned for an outpatient visit within a brief time frame following the screening visit (> 70% within 14 days, >95% within 6 months). More than one in four patients screening IPV+ had an emergency department visit within the 6 months following screening.
Women who screen positive for past-year IPV have high rates of return to outpatient visits following screening, presenting opportunities for follow-up support. Higher rates of emergency department utilization and inpatient stays among women screening IPV+ may indicate adverse health outcomes related to IPV experience.
KEY WORDSintimate partner violence service utilization Veterans Health Administration
This study was funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, IIR 15-142 (Dichter)
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center institutional review board, including a waiver of informed consent.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.Black MC, Basile K, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.Google Scholar
- 2.Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA, Kaufman JS, Lo B, Zonderman AB. Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2012;75(6):959–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lagdon S, Armour C, Stringer M. Adult experience of mental health outcomes as a result of intimate partner violence victimisation: a systematic review. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014;5. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.24794.
- 6.Dichter ME, Sorrentino A, Bellamy S, Medvedeva E, Roberts CB, Iverson KM. Disproportionate mental health burden associated with past-year intimate partner violence among women receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration. J Trauma Stress 2017;30(6):555–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Chamberlain L, Levenson R. Addressing Intimate Partner Violence, Reproductive and Sexual Coercion: A Guide for Obstetric, Gynecologic and Reproductive Health Care Settings. Second ed. San Francisco, CA: Futures Without Violence; 2012.Google Scholar
- 16.Family Violence Prevention Fund. National Consensus Guidelines on Identifying and Responding to Domestic Violence Victimization in Health Care Settings. San Francisco, CA: The Family Violence Prevention Fund; 2004.Google Scholar
- 19.Littel K. Family violence: an intervention model for dental professionals. OVC Bulletin. December 2004: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime; 2004.Google Scholar
- 20.McAlister Groves B, Augustyn M, Lee D, Sawires P. Identifying and Responding to Domestic Violence: Consensus Recommendations for Child and Adolescent Health. San Francisco, CA: Family Violence Prevention Fund; 2004.Google Scholar
- 21.National Center on Domestic Violence Trauma & Mental Health. Responding to Domestic Violence: Tools for Mental Health Providers. National Center on Domestic Violence, Trauma & Mental Health; 2004.Google Scholar
- 24.Kimerling R, Iverson KM, Dichter ME, Rodriguez AL, Wong A, Pavao J. Prevalence of intimate partner violence among women veterans who utilize Veterans Health Administration primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(8):888–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3701-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Frayne S, Phibbs C, Saechao F, Maisel N, Friedman S, Finlay A, et al. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Volume 3. Sociodemographics, Utilization, Costs of Care, and Health Profile. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2014.Google Scholar
- 30.Iverson KM, Huang K, Wells SY, Wright JD, Gerber MR, Wiltsey-Stirman S. Women veterans’ preferences for intimate partner violence screening and response procedures within the Veterans Health Administration. Res Nurs Health 2014;37(4):302–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21602. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kothari CL, Rohs T, Davidson S, Kothari RU, Klein C, Koestner A, et al. Emergency department visits and injury hospitalizations for female and male victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Adv Emer Med 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/502703.
- 32.Lipsky S, Caetano R. The role of race/ethnicity in the relationship between emergency department use and intimate partner violence: Findings from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Am J Public Health 2007;97(12):2246–52. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.091116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.McCloskey LA, Lichter E, Williams C, Gerber M, Wittenberg E, Ganz M. Assessing intimate partner violence in health care settings leads to women’s receipt of interventions and improved health. Public Health Rep 2006;121(4):435–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490612100412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar