Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 11, pp 1186–1192 | Cite as

The Effects of Public Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians on Patient Trust: A Randomized Experiment

  • Alison R. Hwong
  • Sunita Sah
  • Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Financial ties between physicians and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry are common, but little is known about how patient trust is affected by these ties.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how viewing online public disclosure of industry payments affects patients’ trust ratings for physicians, the medical profession, and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry.

Design

This was a randomized experimental evaluation.

Participants

There were 278 English-speaking participants over age 18 who had seen a healthcare provider in the previous 12 months who took part in the study.

Interventions

Participants searched for physicians on an online disclosure database, viewed payments from industry to the physicians, and assigned trust ratings. Participants were randomized to view physicians who received no payment ($0), low payment ($250–300), or high payment (>$13,000) from industry, or to a control arm in which they did not view the disclosure website. They also were asked to search for and then rate trust in their own physician.

Main Measures

Primary outcomes were trust in individual physician, medical profession, and industry. These scales measure trust as a composite of honesty, fidelity, competence, and global trust.

Key Results

Compared to physicians who received no payments, physicians who received payments over $13,000 received lower ratings for honesty [mean (SD): 3.36 (0.86) vs. 2.75 (0.95), p < 0.001] and fidelity [3.19 (0.65) vs. 2.89 (0.68), p = 0.01]. Among the 7.9% of participants who found their own physician on the website, ratings for honesty and fidelity decreased as the industry payment to the physician increased (honesty: Spearman’s ρ = −0.52, p = 0.02; fidelity: Spearman’s ρ = −0.55, p = 0.01). Viewing the disclosure website did not affect trust ratings for the medical profession or industry.

Conclusions

Disclosure of industry payments to physicians affected perceptions of individual physician honesty and fidelity, but not perceptions of competence. Disclosure did not affect trust ratings for the medical profession or the pharmaceutical and medical device industry.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02179632 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02179632).

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributors

The authors wish to thank Stuart Lipsitz, ScD, head of Biostatistical Services at the Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA), for his help with statistical programming and analysis, and Martha Shumway, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, UCSF School of Medicine (San Francisco, CA), for statistical consultation. Neither contributor received compensation for their contributions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funders

Financial support for this study was provided by the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital Department of Medicine. The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, and writing and publishing the report.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the Veterans Health Administration, the National Center for Ethics in Health Care, the U.S. government, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health.

Supplementary material

11606_2017_4122_MOESM1_ESM.docx (129 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 129 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ornstein, C. Another Government Website Rollout That Is Found Wanting. The New York Times. October 1, 2014. Available from: http://nyti.ms/YOOL0E. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  2. 2.
    Institute of Medicine. Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. Washington, DC: National Acad. Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lo B, Ott C. What is the enemy in CME, conflicts of interest or bias? JAMA. 2013;310:1019–1020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sah S. Conflicts of interest and your physician: Psychological processes that cause unexpected changes in behavior. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40:482–487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA. 2000;283:373–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chren MM, Landefeld CS. Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA. 1994;271:684–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlowski JP, Wateska L. The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Chest. 1992;102:270–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richardson E. Health Policy Brief: The Physician Payments Sunshine Act. October 2, 2014. In: Health Affairs. Available from: http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=127. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  9. 9.
    Ornstein C, Weber T, Nguyen D. About Dollars for Docs data. March 11, 2013. In: ProPublica. Available from: http://www.propublica.org/article/about-our-pharma-data. Accessed May 20, 2017
  10. 10.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare, Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Programs: transparency reports and reporting of physician ownership or investment interests. Fed Regist. 2013;78:9457–9528.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caldwell T, Robertson C. Open Payments: early impact and the next wave of reform. Health Affairs Blog. March 3, 2015. Available from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/03/03/open-payments-early-impact-and-the-next-wave-of-reform/. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  12. 12.
    Blackstock OJ, Addison DN, Brenna JS, Alao OA. Trust in primary care providers and antiretroviral adherence in an urban HIV clinic. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23:88–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bonds DE, Camacho F, Bell RA, Duren-Winfield VT, Anderson RT, Goff DC. The association of patient trust and self-care among patients with diabetes mellitus. BMC Fam Pract. 2004;5:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Safran DG, Montgomery JE, Chang H, Murphy J, Rogers WH. Switching doctors: Predictors of voluntary disenrollment from a primary physician’s practice. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:130–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bratton C, Chavin K, Baliga P. Racial disparities in organ donation and why. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:243–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Musa D, Schulz R, Harris R, Silverman M, Thomas SB. Trust in the health care system and the use of preventive health services by older black and white adults. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1293–1299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thom DH, Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Krupat E, Azari R. Patient trust in the physician: relationship to patient requests. Family Practice. 2002;19:476–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baker R, Mainous AG, Gray DP, Love MM. Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors. Scand J Primary Health Care. 2003;21:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thom DH, Hall MA, Pawlson LG. Measuring patients’ trust in physicians when assessing quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:124–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loewenstein G, Sah S, Cain DM. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA. 2012;307:669–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sah S, Cain D, Loewenstein G. Confessing one’s sins but still committing them: Transparency and the failure of disclosure. In Oliver AJ, ed. Essays in Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tattersall MHN, Dimoska A, Gan K. Patients expect transparency in doctors’ relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. Med J Aust. 2009;190:65–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sah S, Loewenstein G, Cain D. Insinuation anxiety: Concern that advice rejection will signal distrust after conflict of interest disclosures. Working Paper. 2015. http://media.wix.com/ugd/4aa4b7_ac680ce8d4224a46ab1f8cc54b684ab8.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  24. 24.
    Wolston, M. An MS Patient Loses Trust When She Finds Out Her Doctor Is Paid By Drug Companies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:2449–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jastifer J, Roberts S. Patients’ awareness of and attitudes toward gifts from pharmaceutical companies to physicians. Int J Health Serv. 2009;39:405–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Licurse A, Barber E, Joffe S, Gross C. The impact of disclosing financial ties in research and clinical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:675–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perry JE, Cox D, Cox A. Trust and Transparency: Patient Perceptions of Physicians’ Financial Relationships with Pharmaceutical Companies. J Law Med Ethics. 2014;42:475–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grande D. Limiting the influence of pharmaceutical industry gifts on physicians: self-regulation or government intervention? JGIM. 2010;25:79–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaiser Permanente. Policy on conflicts of interest in research. Effective August 25, 2011. Available from: goo.gl/26bHdJ. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  30. 30.
    State of Vermont, Office of the Attorney General. Prescribed Products Gift Ban and Disclosure Law, Act 51, No. 51, S. 104. Effective May 26, 2011. Available from: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/2012/Acts/ACT051.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  31. 31.
    Gifts to Practitioners Prohibited, Minnesota Statutes, Section 151.461. 2015. Available from: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=151.461. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  32. 32.
    Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q. 2001;79:613–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hall MA, Camacho F, Dugan E, Balkrishnan R. Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. HSR. 2002;37:1419–39.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zheng B, Hall MA, Dugan E, Kidd KE, Levine D. Development of a scale to measure patients’ trust in health insurers. HSR. 2002;27:185–200.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hall MA, Zheng B, Dugan E, Camacho F, Kidd KE, Mishra A, Balkrishnan R. Measuring patients’ trust in their primary care providers. Med Care Research and Review. 2002;59:293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sah S, Fugh-Berman A. Physicians under the influence: Social psychology and industry marketing strategies. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41:665–672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sah S, Fagerlin A, Ubel P. Effect of physician disclosure of specialty bias on patient trust and treatment choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:7465–7469.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weinfurt KP, Hall MA, Friedman JY, et al. Effects of disclosing financial interests on participation in medical research: a randomized vignette trial. Am Heart J. 2008;156:689–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weinfurt KP, Hall MA, Dinan MA, DePuy V, Friedman JY, Allsbrook JS, et al. Effects of Disclosing Financial Interests on Attitudes Towards Clinical Research. JGIM. 2008;23:860–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Santhakumar S, Adashi EY. The Physician Payment Sunshine Act: testing the value of transparency. JAMA. 2015;313:23–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    “Aggregate” payments are for all pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers for a given fiscal year.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thom DH, Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Kurpat E, Azari R. Patient trust in the physician: relationship to patient requests. Fam Pract. 2002;19:476–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roter DL, Hall JA. Why physician gender matters in shaping the physician-patient relationship. J Women’s Health. 1998;7:1093–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kesselheim AS, Robertson CT, Siri K, Batra P, Franklin JM. Distribution of industry payments to Massachusetts physicians. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2049–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA. Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, a health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Griner A. Open Payments: a matter of maintaining trust. Health Affairs Blog. February 27, 2014. Available from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2014/02/27/open-payments-a-matter-of-maintaining-trust/. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  47. 47.
    Steinbrook R, Ross JS. “Transparency reports” on industry payments to physicians and teaching hospitals. JAMA. 2012;307:1029–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Evans M. How patients will use physician payment data. Morning Consult. 5 October 2014. Available from: http://morningconsult.com/2014/10/health-sunday-10-5/. Accessed May 20, 2017
  49. 49.
    Rosenthal MB, Mello MM. Sunlight as disinfectant—new rules on disclosure of industry payments to physicians. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2052–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sah S, Loewenstein G. Nothing to declare: Mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest. Psychol Sci. 2014;25:575–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison R. Hwong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sunita Sah
    • 3
  • Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Harvard PhD Program in Health Policy and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Johnson Graduate School of ManagementCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  6. 6.National Center for Ethics in Health CareVeterans Health AdministrationWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations