Methods and Outcomes for the Remediation of Clinical Reasoning
- 1.1k Downloads
There is no widely accepted structured, evidence based strategy for the remediation of clinical reasoning skills.
To assess the effectiveness of a standardized clinical reasoning remediation plan for medical learners at various stages of training.
Learners enrolled in the University of Colorado School of Medicine Remediation Program.
From 2006 to 2012, the learner remediation program received 151 referrals. Referrals were made by medical student clerkship directors, residency and fellowship program directors, and through self-referrals. Each learner’s deficiencies were identified using a standardized assessment process; 53 were noted to have clinical reasoning deficits. The authors developed and implemented a ten-step clinical reasoning remediation plan for each of these individuals, whose subsequent performance was independently assessed by unbiased faculty and senior trainees. Participant demographics, faculty time invested, and learner outcomes were tracked.
Prevalence of clinical reasoning deficits did not differ by level of training of the remediating individual (p = 0.49). Overall, the mean amount of faculty time required for remediation was 29.6 h (SD = 29.3), with a median of 18 h (IQR 5–39) and a range of 2–100 h. Fifty-one of the 53 (96 %) passed the post remediation reassessment. Thirty-eight (72 %) learners either graduated from their original program or continue to practice in good standing. Four (8 %) additional residents who were placed on probation and five (9 %) who transferred to another program have since graduated.
The ten-step remediation plan proved to be successful for the majority of learners struggling with clinical reasoning based on reassessment and limited subsequent educational outcomes. Next steps include implementing the program at other institutions to assess generalizability and tracking long-term outcomes on clinical care.
KEY WORDSclinical reasoning medical decision making medical education cognition/problem solving
Conflict of Interest
Jeannette Guerrasio, MD: author of book entitled, ‘Remediation of the Struggling Medical Learner.’
Eva Aagaard, MD: none.
- 6.Szumacher E, Catton P, Jones G, Bradley R, Kwan J, Cherryman F, Palmer C, Nyhof-Young J. Helping learners in difficulty—the incidence and effectiveness of remedial programme of the medical radiation sciences programme at University of Toronto and the Michener Institute for Applied Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36:725–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Guerrasio J. Remediation of the Struggling Medical Learner. Irwin, PA: Association for Hospital Medical Education Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 28.Bordage G, Lemieux M. Semantic structures and diagnostic thinking of experts and novices. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Acad Med. 1991;66:S70–72.Google Scholar
- 30.Hawkins D, Paul R, Elder L. Introduction Why a Teacher’s Guide to Clinical Reasoning. The Thinkers Guide to Clinical Reasoning. Dillon, California: Foundation of Critical Thinking Press; 2010:3.Google Scholar
- 31.First Consult. Elsevier, Inc. 2013. Available at http://www.firstconsult.com/php/433407726-491/home.html. Accessed June, 2014.
- 32.Blankenburg R, Long M, Rosenbluth G, Marisco N, Johnstone N, Dunagan M, Pantaleoni J, Augustine E, Stuart E. Revisiting how we think: Innovative ideas for promoting and assessing clinical reasoning. PAS May 2011.Google Scholar
- 33.Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE Guide No. 75 Med Teach 2013; Jan 29.Google Scholar
- 36.Guerrasio J, Brooks E, Rumack C, Christensen A, Aagaard E. Graduate medical trainees placed on probation: Descriptive statistics and outcomes. Poster presented at: President’s Teaching and Learning Collaborative; 2013 Aug 11; Aurora, CO.Google Scholar