Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 1607–1614 | Cite as

Methods and Outcomes for the Remediation of Clinical Reasoning

  • Jeannette GuerrasioEmail author
  • Eva M. Aagaard
Original Research

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

There is no widely accepted structured, evidence based strategy for the remediation of clinical reasoning skills.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of a standardized clinical reasoning remediation plan for medical learners at various stages of training.

SETTING

Learners enrolled in the University of Colorado School of Medicine Remediation Program.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

From 2006 to 2012, the learner remediation program received 151 referrals. Referrals were made by medical student clerkship directors, residency and fellowship program directors, and through self-referrals. Each learner’s deficiencies were identified using a standardized assessment process; 53 were noted to have clinical reasoning deficits. The authors developed and implemented a ten-step clinical reasoning remediation plan for each of these individuals, whose subsequent performance was independently assessed by unbiased faculty and senior trainees. Participant demographics, faculty time invested, and learner outcomes were tracked.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Prevalence of clinical reasoning deficits did not differ by level of training of the remediating individual (p = 0.49). Overall, the mean amount of faculty time required for remediation was 29.6 h (SD = 29.3), with a median of 18 h (IQR 5–39) and a range of 2–100 h. Fifty-one of the 53 (96 %) passed the post remediation reassessment. Thirty-eight (72 %) learners either graduated from their original program or continue to practice in good standing. Four (8 %) additional residents who were placed on probation and five (9 %) who transferred to another program have since graduated.

DISCUSSION

The ten-step remediation plan proved to be successful for the majority of learners struggling with clinical reasoning based on reassessment and limited subsequent educational outcomes. Next steps include implementing the program at other institutions to assess generalizability and tracking long-term outcomes on clinical care.

KEY WORDS

clinical reasoning medical decision making medical education cognition/problem solving 

Notes

Contributors

None.

Funders

None.

Prior Presentations

None.

Conflict of Interest

Jeannette Guerrasio, MD: author of book entitled, ‘Remediation of the Struggling Medical Learner.’

Eva Aagaard, MD: none.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Reamy BV, Harman JH. Residents in trouble: an in-depth assessment of the 25-year experience of a single family medicine residency. Fam Med. 2006;38(4):252–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olmesdahl PJ. The establishment of student needs: an important internal factor affecting course outcome. Med Teach. 1999;21(2):174–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwind CJ, Williams RG, Boehler ML, Dunnington GL. Do individual attendings’ post-rotation performance ratings detect residents’ clinical performance deficiencies? Acad Med. 2004;79(5):453–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yao DC, Wright SM. National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents. JAMA. 2000;284(9):1099–1104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul G, Hinman G, Dottl S, Passon J. Academic development: a survey of academic difficulties experiences by medical students and support services provided. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21(3):254–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szumacher E, Catton P, Jones G, Bradley R, Kwan J, Cherryman F, Palmer C, Nyhof-Young J. Helping learners in difficulty—the incidence and effectiveness of remedial programme of the medical radiation sciences programme at University of Toronto and the Michener Institute for Applied Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36:725–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott Smith C, Stevens N, Servis M. A general framework for approaching residents in difficulty. Fam Med. 2007;39(5):331–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hicks PJ, Cox SM, Espey EL, Goepfort AR, Bienstock JL, Erickson SS. To the point: medical education reviews—dealing with student difficulties in the clinical setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):1915–1922.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hauer KE, O’Brien B, Poncelet AN. Longitudinal integrated clerkship education: better for learners and patients. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Audetat MC, Dory V, Nendaz M, Vanpee D, Pestiaux D, Perron NJ, Charlin B. What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2012;46:216–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott I. Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ. 2009;339:22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guerrasio J, Garrity MJ, Aagaard EM. Learner deficits and academic outcomes of medical students, residents, fellows and physicians referred to a remediation Program, 2006–2012. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):352–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guerrasio J. Remediation of the Struggling Medical Learner. Irwin, PA: Association for Hospital Medical Education Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Regehr G, Cline J, Norman GR, Brooks L. Effect of processing strategy on diagnostic skill in dermatology. Acad Med. 1994;69(Suppl):S34–S36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Med Educ. 2003;37:695–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blissett S, Cavalcanti RB, Sibbald M. Should we teach using schemas? Evidence from a randomised trial. Med Educ. 2012;46:815–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kassirer JP, Gorry GA. Clinical problem solving: a behavioral analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1978;89:245–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kassirer J. Diagnostic reasoning. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:893–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barrows HS, Norman GR, Neufeld VR, Feightner JW. The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clin Invest Med. 1982;5:49–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1109–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implications. Acad Med. 1990;65:611–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med. 1994;69:883–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Custers EJ, Boshuzien HP, Schmidt HG. The influence of medical expertise, case typicality and illness script components on case processing and disease probability estimates. Mem Cogn. 1996;24:384–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norman GR, Brooks LR, Allen SW, Rosenthal D. The development of expertise in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1063–1068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang R, Bordage G, Connell K. The importance of early problem representation during case presentations. Acad Med. 1998;73:S109–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bordage G. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications. Acad Med. 1999;74(Suppl):S138–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bordage G, Lemieux M. Which medical textbook to read? Emphasizing semantic structures. Acad Med. 1990;65(Supp):S23–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bordage G, Lemieux M. Semantic structures and diagnostic thinking of experts and novices. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Acad Med. 1991;66:S70–72.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):S70–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hawkins D, Paul R, Elder L. Introduction Why a Teacher’s Guide to Clinical Reasoning. The Thinkers Guide to Clinical Reasoning. Dillon, California: Foundation of Critical Thinking Press; 2010:3.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    First Consult. Elsevier, Inc. 2013. Available at http://www.firstconsult.com/php/433407726-491/home.html. Accessed June, 2014.
  32. 32.
    Blankenburg R, Long M, Rosenbluth G, Marisco N, Johnstone N, Dunagan M, Pantaleoni J, Augustine E, Stuart E. Revisiting how we think: Innovative ideas for promoting and assessing clinical reasoning. PAS May 2011.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE Guide No. 75 Med Teach 2013; Jan 29.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2217–2225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Irby DM. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69(5):333–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guerrasio J, Brooks E, Rumack C, Christensen A, Aagaard E. Graduate medical trainees placed on probation: Descriptive statistics and outcomes. Poster presented at: President’s Teaching and Learning Collaborative; 2013 Aug 11; Aurora, CO.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zbieranowski I, Takahashi SG, Verma S, Spadafora SM. Remediation of Residents in Difficulty: A retrospective 10-year review of the experience of a postgraduate board of examiners. Acad Med. 2013;88:111–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Charlin B, Boshuzian HP, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1178–1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations