Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 10, pp 1349–1354 | Cite as

Resident Duty Hours: A Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors

  • Megha Garg
  • Brian C. Drolet
  • Dominick Tammaro
  • Staci A. Fischer
Original Research

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

In 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented new Common Program Requirements to regulate duty hours of resident physicians, with three goals: improved patient safety, quality of resident education and quality of life for trainees. We sought to assess Internal Medicine program director (IMPD) perceptions of the 2011 Common Program Requirements in July 2012, one year following implementation of the new standards.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of all IMPDs at ACGME-accredited programs in the United States (N = 381) was performed using a 32-question, self-administered survey. Contact information was identified for 323 IMPDs. Three individualized emails were sent to each director over a 6-week period, requesting participation in the survey. Outcomes measured included approval of duty hours regulations, as well as perceptions of changes in graduate medical education and patient care resulting from the revised ACGME standards.

RESULTS

A total of 237 surveys were returned (73 % response rate). More than half of the IMPDs (52 %) reported “overall” approval of the 2011 duty hour regulations, with greater than 70 % approval of all individual regulations except senior resident daily duty periods (49 % approval) and 16-hour intern shifts (17 % approval). Although a majority feel resident quality of life has improved (55 %), most IMPDs believe that resident education (60 %) is worse. A minority report that quality (8 %) or safety (11 %) of patient care has improved.

CONCLUSION

One year after implementation of new ACGME duty hour requirements, IMPDs report overall approval of the standards, but strong disapproval of 16-hour shift limits for interns. Few program directors perceive that the duty hour restrictions have resulted in better care for patients or education of residents. Although resident quality of life seems improved, most IMPDs report that their own workload has increased. Based on these results, the intended benefits of duty hour regulations may not yet have been realized.

KEY WORDS

graduate medical education resident duty hours compliance patient safety 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributors

The authors wish to thank Dr. Mamoona Khokhar for her contributions in study design and data collection. The authors also wish to thank Ms. Amanda Richman for her assistance with background literature search, and Mr. Carlos Rodriguez for his assistance with the statistical analysis presented in this study.

Funders

Support for the study was provided by the Rhode Island Hospital Department of Graduate Medical Education for use of SurveyMonkey ®; there were no other expenses or sources of financial support.

Prior Presentations

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2014_2912_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (225 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 225 kb)

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    The ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards: Enhancing Quality of Care, Supervision, and Resident Professional Development. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). 2011. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/jgme-monograph%5B1%5D.pdf
  2. 2.
    Iglehart JK. Revisiting duty-hour limits—IOM recommendations for patient safety and resident education. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2633–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Common Program Requirements. 2010. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/dh_dutyhoursCommonPR07012007.pdf
  4. 4.
    Weinberger S, Arora V. Testimony to the ACGME Duty Hours Task Force. Chicago, IL: American College of Physicians; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    AAIM Response to ACGME Request. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. 2009. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.im.org/AcademicAffairs/milestones/Documents/AAIM%20Categorization%20Review%20and%20Comment%202012.pdf
  6. 6.
    Shea JA, Willett LL, Borman KR, et al. Anticipated consequences of the 2011 duty hours standards: views of internal medicine and surgery program directors. Acad Med. 2012;87:895–903.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mir HR, Cannada LK, Murray JN, Black KP, Wolf JM. Orthopaedic resident and program director opinions of resident duty hours: a national survey. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93:e1421–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lo V, Ward C. 2011 ACGME duty hour week proposal-a national survey of family medicine residents. Fam Med. 2011;43:318–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drolet BC, Spalluto LB, Fischer SA. Residents’ perspectives on ACGME regulation of supervision and duty hours—a national survey. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:e34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drolet BC, Soh IY, Shultz PA, Fischer SA. A thematic review of resident commentary on duty hour and supervision regulations. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:454–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Common Program Requirements. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2011. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/Common_Program_Requirements_07012011%5B1%5D.pdf
  12. 12.
    Drolet BC, Bishop KD. Unintended consequences of duty hours regulation. Acad Med. 2012;87:680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arora VM, Farnan JM, Humphrey HJ. Professionalism in the era of duty hours: time for a shift change? JAMA. 2012;308:2195–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auger KA, Landrigan CP, Gonzalez del Rey JA, Sieplinga KR, Sucharew HJ, Simmons JM. Better rested, but more stressed? Evidence of the effects of resident work hour restrictions. Acad Pediatr. 2012;12:335–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wayne DB, Hauer KE. Counting quality, not hours: understanding the impact of duty hour reform on internal medicine residency education. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1400–1.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drolet BC, Christopher DA, Fischer SA. Residents’ response to duty-hour regulations—a follow-up national survey. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:e35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fletcher KE, Visotcky AM, Slagle JM, Tarima S, Weinger MB, Schapira MM. The composition of intern work while on call. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1432–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drolet BC, Khokhar MT, Fischer SA. The 2011 duty-hour requirements—a survey of residency program directors. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:694–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rickards G, Magee C, Artino A. You can’t fix by analysis what you’ve spoiled by design: developing survey instruments and collecting validity evidence. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:407–10.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drolet BC, Khokhar MT, Fischer SA. 2011 ACGME common program requirements—a post-implementation study of program directors. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:694–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6:21–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Revelle W. psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. 2014. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://cran.r-project.org/
  23. 23.
    Bernaards CA, Jennrich RI. Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 2005;65:676–96. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.stat.ucla.edu/research/gpa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gadermann A, Guhn M, Zumbo B. Estimating ordinal reliability for likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012;17:1–12.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Block L, Habicht R, Wu AW, et al. In the wake of the 2003 and 2011 duty hours regulations, how do internal medicine interns spend their time? J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1042–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Desai SV, Feldman L, Brown L, et al. Effect of the 2011 vs 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(8):649–55.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arora V, Johnson J, Lovinger D, Humphrey HJ, Meltzer DO. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:401–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nasca TJ. Letter to the Community. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2010.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Drolet BC, Schwede M, Bishop KD, Fischer SA. Compliance and falsification of duty hours: reports from residents and program directors. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:368–73.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    2012 APDIM Program Directors Survey. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. 2013. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.im.org/toolbox/surveys/APDIMSurveyData/Documents/2012_APDIM_Survey_summary_web.pdf
  31. 31.
    Arora V. APDIM Survey Committee Update. Atlanta, GA: Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine; 2012.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    2011 APDIM Program Directors Survey. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. 2012. Accessed May 20, 2014, at http://www.im.org/toolbox/surveys/APDIMSurveyData/Documents/2011_APDIM_summary_web.pdf
  33. 33.
    Nuckols TK, Escarce JJ. Cost implications of ACGME’s 2011 changes to resident duty hours and the training environment. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:241–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nuckols TK, Bhattacharya J, Wolman DM, Ulmer C, Escarce JJ. Cost implications of reduced work hours and workloads for resident physicians. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2202–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mansi IA. Changing the formula of residents’ work hours in internal medicine: moving from “years in training” to “hours in training”. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3:14–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Volpp KG, Shea JA, Small DS, et al. Effect of a protected sleep period on hours slept during extended overnight in-hospital duty hours among medical interns: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;308:2208–17.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Emanuel EJ, Fuchs VR. Shortening medical training by 30%. JAMA. 2012;307:1143–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307:1805–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megha Garg
    • 1
    • 3
  • Brian C. Drolet
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dominick Tammaro
    • 1
    • 3
  • Staci A. Fischer
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MedicineThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island HospitalProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island HospitalProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Graduate Medical Education CommitteeRhode Island HospitalProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations