Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1113–1121 | Cite as

Comparative Effectiveness of Audit-Feedback Versus Additional Physician Communication Training to Improve Cancer Screening for Patients with Limited Health Literacy

  • Eboni G. Price-Haywood
  • Jewel Harden-Barrios
  • Lisa A. Cooper
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

We designed a continuing medical education (CME) program to teach primary care physicians (PCP) how to engage in cancer risk communication and shared decision making with patients who have limited health literacy (HL).

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated whether training PCPs, in addition to audit-feedback, improves their communication behaviors and increases cancer screening among patients with limited HL to a greater extent than only providing clinical performance feedback.

DESIGN

Four-year cluster randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen PCPs and 168 patients with limited HL who were overdue for colorectal/breast/cervical cancer screening.

INTERVENTIONS

Communication intervention PCPs received skills training that included standardized patient (SP) feedback on counseling behaviors. All PCPs underwent chart audits of patients’ screening status semiannually up to 24 months and received two annual performance feedback reports.

MAIN MEASURES

PCPs experienced three unannounced SP encounters during which SPs rated PCP communication behaviors. We examined between-group differences in changes in SP ratings and patient knowledge of cancer screening guidelines over 12 months; and changes in patient cancer screening rates over 24 months.

KEY RESULTS

There were no group differences in SP ratings of physician communication at baseline. At follow-up, communication intervention PCPs were rated higher in general communication about cancer risks and shared decision making related to colorectal cancer screening compared to PCPs who only received performance feedback. Screening rates increased among patients of PCPs in both groups; however, there were no between-group differences in screening rates except for mammography. The communication intervention did not improve patient cancer screening knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Compared to audit and feedback alone, including PCP communication training increases PCP patient-centered counseling behaviors, but not cancer screening among patients with limited HL. Larger studies must be conducted to determine whether lack of changes in cancer screening were due to clinic/patient sample size versus ineffectiveness of communication training to change outcomes.

KEY WORDS

communication shared decision making health literacy cancer screening standardized patients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributors

The authors would like to thank Dr. Roy Weiner for his critical review of this manuscript and Dr. John LeFante for his assistance with examining intraclass correlations for cancer screening outcomes.

Funders

This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Faculty Development Program (Grant # 63523). Dr. Cooper is supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24 HL83113 and P50 HL0105187).

Prior Presentations

This work was presented at the American Association for Cancer Research 3rd and 4th Annual Cancer Health Disparities Conferences in October 2010 and September 2011.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S: Government Printing Office; 2000. November.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mika VS, Kelly PJ, Price MA, Franquiz M, Villarreal R. The ABCs of health literacy. Fam Community Health. 2005;28:351–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katz MG, Jacobson TA, Veledar E, Kripalani S. Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:782–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aboumatar HJ, Carson KA, Beach MC, Roter DL, Cooper LA. The Impact of Health Literacy on Desire for Participation in Healthcare, Medical Visit Communication, and Patient Reported Outcomes among Patients with Hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May 21. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griffith KA, McGuire DB, Royak-Schaler R, Plowden KO, Steinberger EK. Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer. 2008;113:276–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health. 2008;17:1477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox SA, Heritage J, Stockdale SE, Asch SM, Duan N, Reise SP. Cancer screening adherence: does physician–patient communication matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75:178–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buchanan AH, Skinner CS, Rawl SM, Moser BK, Champion VL, Scott LL, Strigo TS, Bastian L. Patients’ interest in discussing cancer risk and risk management with primary care physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:77–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bao Y, Fox SA, Escarce JJ. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in the discussion of cancer screening: “between-” versus “within-” physician differences. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:950–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Price-Haywood EG, Roth KG, Shelby K, Cooper LA. Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(Suppl 2):S126–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, et al. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23:433–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:27–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sudore RL, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve care for patients with limited health literacy. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2009;16:20–29.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients’ perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:29–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Busija L, Pausenberger E, Haines TP, Haymes S, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH. Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:S383–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stretcher VJ, Rosenstock JM. The Health Belief Model. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997. p. 41–59.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singer JD, Using SAS. PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat. 1998;24:323–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12, CD003267. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.Review.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Culver JO, Bowen DJ, Reynolds SE, Pinsky LE, Press N, Burke W. Breast cancer risk communication: assessment of primary care physicians by standardized patients. Genet Med. 2009;11:735–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ling BS, Trauth JM, Fine MJ, et al. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care? Med Care. 2008;46:S23–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katz ML, Broder-Oldach B, Fisher JL, et al. Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making? J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1135–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zapka JM, Klabunde CN, Arora NK, Yuan G, Smith JL, Kobrin SC. Physicians’ colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:509–21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mosen DM, Feldstein AC, Perrin NA, et al. More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening associated with higher screening. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:265–71.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kelly PA, Haidet P. Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:119–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peterson NB, Dwyer KA, Mulvaney SA, Dietrich MS, Rothman RL. The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99:1105–12.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miller DP Jr, Brownlee CD, McCoy TP, Pignone MP. The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a survey study. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:16.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:97–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:869–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hade EM, Murray DM, Pennell ML, et al. Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screeningstudies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rethans JJ, Gorter S, Bokken L, Morrison L. Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: a systematic literature review. Med Educ. 2007;41:537–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luck J, Peabody JW. Using standardised patients to measure physicians’ practice: validation study using audio recordings. BMJ. 2002;325:679.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Srinivasan M, Franks P, Meredith LS, Fiscella K, Epstein RM, Kravitz RL. Connoisseurs of care? Unannounced standardized patients’ ratings of physicians. Med Care. 2006;44:1092–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Frank P, Friscella K, Shiedls CG, et al. Are patient ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:229–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eboni G. Price-Haywood
    • 1
  • Jewel Harden-Barrios
    • 1
  • Lisa A. Cooper
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MedicineTulane University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations