Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 915–919 | Cite as

Making General Internal Medicine Research Relevant to the Older Patient with Multiple Chronic Comorbidities

  • Lee A. LindquistEmail author
  • Kenneth Covinsky
  • Kenneth M. Langa
  • Brent G. Petty
  • Brent C. Williams
  • Jean S. Kutner


General Internal Medicine research evolves in response to the needs of the patients to whom we provide care. Currently, many studies exclude older adults who deeply affect the clinical care of this population. With the number of older adults increasing, creating research protocols that include older adults with multiple chronic comorbidities is imperative. Through funding from the Association of Specialty Physicians, a working group of aging-responsive researchers from the Society of General Internal Medicine was convened to tackle this issue. The goal of this article is threefold: 1) to shed light on the current exclusion of older adults in research; 2) to identify and propose research protocol solutions for overcoming barriers to including older adults in research; and 3) to provide suggestions for research funding. The extent to which these recommendations can create change depends greatly on our researcher colleagues. By embracing these challenges, we hope that the care provided to older adults with multiple chronic conditions will no longer be extrapolated, but become evidence-based.


General Internal Medicine Multiple Chronic Condition Potential Study Participant Geriatric Condition Adverse Event Monitoring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    McMurdo MET, Witham MD, Gillespie ND. Including older people in clinical research—benefits shown in trials in younger people may not apply to older people. Br Med J. 2005;331(7524):1036–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zulman DM, Sussman JB, Chen X, Cigolle CT, Blaum CS, Hayward RA. Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(7):783–90.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Spall HGC, Torn A, Kiss A, Fowler RA. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals—a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297(11):1233–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Policy on the Inclusion of Priority Populations in Research. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Government Accountability Office. Prescription drugs: FDA guidance and regulations related to data on elderly persons in clinical drug trials (GAO-07-47R). Washington, D.C.; 2007.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S, Fried LP, Cutler GB Jr, Walston JD. Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(4):625–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luck T, Luppa M, Briel S, Matschinger H, König HH, Bleich S, Villringer A, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG. Mild cognitive impairment: incidence and risk factors results of the leipzig longitudinal study of the aged. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(10):1903–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karlawish J. Measuring decision-making capacity in cognitively impaired individuals. Neurosignals. 2008;16(1):91–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 – Public Welfare, Part 46 – Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46.116. Available at: (Accessed Sept. 27, 2013).
  10. 10.
    Health and Retirement Study: Sample sizes and response rates. Available at: (Accessed Sept. 27, 2013).
  11. 11.
    Emanuel EJ, Menikoff J. Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. NEJM. 2011;365(12):1145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(5):780–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tinetti ME, McAvay GJ, Murphy TE, Gross CP, Lin H, Allore HG. Contribution of individual diseases to death in older adults with multiple diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1448–56.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tinetti ME, McAvay GJ, Chang SS, Newman AB, Fitzpatrick AL, Fried TR, Peduzzi PN. Contribution of multiple chronic conditions to universal health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(9):1686–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The Mini-Cog: a cognitive “vital sign” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual eldelr. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(11):1021–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–9. Available at (accessed Sept.27, 2013).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10:20–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLeod CM, ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Columbia Univ Press; 1949. P.196.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chang VT, Hwang SS, Kasimis B, et al. Shorter symptom assessment instruments: the Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS). Cancer Investig. 2004;22:526–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):941–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9 validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale: recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5:165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lachs MS, Feinstein AR, Cooney LM Jr, Drickamer MA, Marottoli RA, Pannill FC, Tinetti ME. A simple procedure for general screening for functional disability in elderly patients. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(9):699–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Working Group on Health Outcomes for Older Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions. Universal health outcome measures for older persons with multiple chronic conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(12):2333–41.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee A. Lindquist
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kenneth Covinsky
    • 2
  • Kenneth M. Langa
    • 3
    • 4
  • Brent G. Petty
    • 5
  • Brent C. Williams
    • 3
  • Jean S. Kutner
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of Geriatrics and General Internal MedicineNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Division of GeriatricsUniversity of California San Francisco School of MedicineSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Michigan School of MedicineAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management ResearchAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  6. 6.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations