Prescription Opioid Analgesics Increase the Risk of Depression
- 999 Downloads
Prescription opioid analgesic use has quintupled recently. Evidence linking opioid use with depression emanates from animal models and studies of persons with co-occurring substance use and major depression. Little is known about depressogenic effects of opioid use in other populations.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether prescription opioids are associated with increased risk of diagnosed depression.
Retrospective cohort study, new user design.
Medical record data from 49,770 US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system patients with no recent (24-month) history of opioid use or a diagnosis of depression in 1999 and 2000.
Propensity scores were used to control for bias by indication, and the data were weighted to balance the distribution of covariates by duration of incident opioid exposure. Cox proportional hazard models with adjustment for painful conditions were used to estimate the association between duration of prescription opioid use and the subsequent risk of development of depression between 2001 and 2007.
Of 49,770 patients who were prescribed an opioid analgesic, 91 % had a prescription for < 90 days, 4 % for 90–180 days, and 5 % for > 180 days. Compared to patients whose prescription was for < 90 days, the risk of depression increased significantly as the duration of opioid prescription increased (HR = 1.25; 95 % CI: 1.05–1.46 for 90–180 days, and HR = 1.51; 95 % CI:1.31–1.74 for > 180 days).
In this sample of veterans with no recent (24-month) history of depression or opioid analgesic use, the risk of development of depression increased as the duration of opioid analgesic exposure increased. The potential for depressogenic effect should be considered in risk-benefit discussions, and patients initiating opioid treatment should be monitored for development of depression.
KEY WORDSprescription opioid analgesics depression propensity score epidemiology administrative medical records veteran
- 5.Kluger J. The new drug crisis: addiction by prescription. Time 2010:46–9.Google Scholar
- 8.Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. In: Administration SAMHSA, ed. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2011.Google Scholar
- 10.Department of Health & Human Services CfDCaP. Unintentional Drug Poisoning in the United States; 2010.Google Scholar
- 11.Jackson SW. Melancholia and depression: from hippocratic times to modern times. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
- 20.Oxycodone and acetaminophen: drug information. In: Lexicomp, Inc; 2012.Google Scholar
- 21.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Fourth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
- 24.Frayne SM, Miller DR, Sharkansky EJ, Jackson VW, Wang F, Halanych JH, Berlowitz DR, Kader B, Rosen CS, Keane TM. Using administrative data to identify mental illness: what approach is best? American Journal of Medical Quality 2010;25:42–50.Google Scholar
- 25.Solberg LI, Engebretson KI, Sperl-Hillen JM, Hroscikoski MC, O'Connor PJ. Are claims data accurate enough to identify patients for performance measures or quality improvement? The case of diabetes, heart disease, and depression. American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:238-245.Google Scholar
- 30.Kilpatrick RD, Gilberston D, Brookhart MA, Polley E, Rothman KJ, Bradbury BD. Exploring large weight deletion and the ability to balance confounders when using inverse probability of treatment weighting in the presence of rate treatment decisions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:111–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Healy D. Pharmageddon. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 2010.Google Scholar