Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 1405–1409 | Cite as

Physicians Criticizing Physicians to Patients

  • Susan H. McDanielEmail author
  • Diane S. Morse
  • Shmuel Reis
  • Elizabeth A. Edwardsen
  • Mary Gale Gurnsey
  • Adam Taupin
  • Jennifer J. Griggs
  • Cleveland G. Shields
Original Research



Teamwork is critical to providing excellent healthcare, and effective communication is essential for teamwork. Physicians often discuss patient referrals from other physicians, including referrals from outside their primary institution. Sharing conflicting information or negative judgments of other physicians to patients may be unprofessional. Poor teamwork within healthcare systems has been associated with patient mortality and lower staff well-being.


This analysis explored how physicians talk to patients with advanced cancer about care rendered by other physicians.


Standardized patients (SPs) portraying advanced lung cancer attended covertly recorded visits with consenting oncologists and family physicians.


Twenty community-based oncologists and 19 family physicians had encounters with SPs.


Physician comments about care by other physicians were extracted from transcriptions and analyzed qualitatively. These comments were categorized as Supportive or Critical. We also examined whether there were differences between physicians who provide supportive comments and those who provided critical comments.


Fourteen of the 34 encounters (41 %) included in this analysis contained a total of 42 comments about the patient’s previous care. Twelve of 42 comments (29 %) were coded as Supportive, twenty-eight (67 %) as Critical, and two (4 %) as Neutral. Supportive comments attributed positive qualities to another physician or their care. Critical comments included one specialty criticizing another and general lack of trust in physicians.


This study described comments by physicians criticizing other physicians to patients. This behavior may affect patient satisfaction and quality of care. Healthcare system policies and training should discourage this behavior.


physician communication teams criticism cancer 




The data collection for this study was funded by the US National Cancer Institute R21CA124913, Cleveland G Shields PhD, PI, and Jennifer J Griggs MD, Co-Investigator. Analysis and writing for Diane Morse MD was funded by United States National Institute of Mental Health T32 MH18911, PI Eric Caine, MD; National Institute on Drug Abuse 1K23DA031612-01A1; and the McGowan Charitable Fund, 524475.


Thanks to Ronald Epstein MD and Richard Frankel PhD for their critiques and input on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA. 2004;291(10):1246–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rutherford JS, Flin R, Mitchell L. Teamwork, communication, and anaesthetic assistance in Scotland. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(1):21–6. PubMed PMID: 22696557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2009;53:143–151. Retrieved from accessed April 6, 2013.
  4. 4.
    Armour FR, Bramble JD, McQuillan R. Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery. 2011;150:771–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, Stange KC. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Affairs. 2010;29:1489–1495. Retrieved from accessed April 6, 2013.
  6. 6.
    Rosenstein A. Managing disruptive behaviors in the health care setting: process, policy, prevention and intervention. Adv Psychol Res. 2009;72:1–14.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenstein AH, O’Daniel M. Original Research: Disruptive Behavior and Clinical Outcomes: Perceptions of Nurses and Physicians: Nurses, physicians, and administrators say that clinicians’ disruptive behavior has negative effects on clinical outcomes. American Journal of Nursing. 2005;105:54. Retrieved from Accessed April 6, 2013.
  8. 8.
    Samenow CP, Spickard Jr A, Swiggart W, Regan J, Barrett D. Consequences of Physician Disruptive Behavior. Tenn. Med. 2007;38–40.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber DO. Poll results: doctors’ disruptive behavior disturbs physician leaders. Phys Exec. 2004;30:6–14.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    AMA Code of Ethics E-9.045. Physicians with disruptive behavior. March 2009. Available at Accessed April 6, 2013.
  11. 11.
    Beckerman J. Personal Communication. Office of Patient- and Family-Centered Care. University of Rochester Medical Center. Rochester NY. March 7. 2013Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Treatment of Lung Cancer, Accessed April 6, 2013).
  14. 14.
    Franz CE, Epstein R, Miller KN, Brown A, Song J, Feldman M, Franks P, et al. Caught in the act? Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of physician detection of unannounced standardized patients. Heal Serv Res. 2006;41(6):2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shields CG, Coker CJ, Poulsen SS, Doyle JM, Fiscella K, Epstein RM, Griggs JJ. Patient-centered communication and prognosis discussions with cancer patients. Patient EducCouns. 2009;77:437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S. Discourse analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:570–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller W, Crabtree B. Primary care research: a multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications; 1999:17–18.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Thousand Parks Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 1998:208–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Creswell JW, Maietta RC (2001) Systematic procedures of inquiry and computer data analysis software for qualitative research. In: Salkind NJ, Delbert MC, eds. Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement (6th ed.,) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; pp. 142–143–184.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leape LL, Shore MF, Dienstag JL, Mayer RJ, Edgman-Levitan S, Meyer GS, Healy GB. A culture of respect, Part 1: the nature and causes of disrespectful behavior by physicians. Academic Med. 2012;87:845–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    American College of Physicians. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:76–104.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1365–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berry W. Minimizing vulnerability to malpractice claims. Elements of Contemporary Practice. Decker Intellectual Properties. 2011;1–11.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, et al. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA. 1992;267:1359–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Griffen FD. ACS closed claims study reveals critical failures to communicate. Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. 2007;92:11–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bowen M. Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York: Aronson, Jason Inc; 1985.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S (2009) Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3. Retrieved from
  28. 28.
    Roberts KH. New challenges to organizational research: high reliability organizations. Organ Environ. 1989;3:111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roberts KH, Stout S, Halpern J. Decision dynamics in two high-reliability military organizations. Manag Sci. 1994;40:614–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mishra AA. In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. J Oper Manag. 2009;27:324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mickan SM, Rodger SA. Effective health care teams: A model of six characteristics developed from shared perceptions. J Interprofessional Care. 2005;19:358–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu AM, McPhee SJ, Christensen JF. Mistakes in medical practice. In: Feldman MD, Christensen JF, eds. Behavioral Medicine. New York: Lange; 2008:375.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hunt DD, Scott C, Zhong S, Goldstein E. Frequency and effect of negative comments (“badmouthing”) on medical students’ career choices. Acad Med. 1996;71(6):665–9. PubMed PMID: 9125925.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kamien BA, Bassiri M, Kamien M. Doctors badmouthing each other. Does it Affect medical students’ career choices? Aust Fam Physician. 1999 Jun;28(6):576–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stephens MB, Lennon C, Durning SJ, Maurer D, DeZee K. Professional badmouthing: who does it and how common is it? Fam Med. 2010;42(6):388–90. PubMed PMID: 20526900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Leape LL, Shore MF, Dienstag JL, Mayer RJ, Edgman-Levitan S, Meyer GS, Healy GB. A culture of respect, Part 2: Creating a culture of respect. Academic Med. 2012;87:853–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan H. McDaniel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Diane S. Morse
    • 1
    • 3
  • Shmuel Reis
    • 4
  • Elizabeth A. Edwardsen
    • 5
  • Mary Gale Gurnsey
    • 1
  • Adam Taupin
    • 1
  • Jennifer J. Griggs
    • 6
  • Cleveland G. Shields
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine in the GalileeBar-Ilan UniversitySafedIsrael
  5. 5.Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  6. 6.Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology and Health Management and PolicyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  7. 7.Human Development & Family StudiesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations