Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes: The Coached Care (R2D2C2) Project
Despite numerous efforts to change healthcare delivery, the profile of disparities in diabetes care and outcomes has not changed substantially over the past decade.
To understand potential contributors to disparities in diabetes care and glycemic control.
Cross sectional analysis.
Seven outpatient clinics affiliated with an academic medical center.
Adult patients with type 2 diabetes who were Mexican American, Vietnamese American or non-Hispanic white (n = 1,484).
Glycemic control was measured as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level. Patient, provider and system characteristics included demographic characteristics; access to care; quality of process of care including clinical inertia; quality of interpersonal care; illness burden; mastery (diabetes management confidence, passivity); and adherence to treatment.
Unadjusted HbA1c values were significantly higher for Mexican American patients (n = 782) (mean = 8.3 % [SD:2.1]) compared with non-Hispanic whites (n = 389) (mean = 7.1 % [SD:1.4]). There were no significant differences in HbA1c values between Vietnamese American and non-Hispanic white patients. There were no statistically significant group differences in glycemic control after adjustment for multiple measures of access, and quality of process and interpersonal care. Disease management mastery and adherence to treatment were related to glycemic control for all patients, independent of race/ethnicity.
Generalizability to other minorities or to patients with poorer access to care may be limited.
The complex interplay among patient, physician and system characteristics contributed to disparities in HbA1c between Mexican American and non-Hispanic white patients. In contrast, Vietnamese American patients achieved HbA1c levels comparable to non-Hispanic whites and adjustment for numerous characteristics failed to identify confounders that could have masked disparities in this subgroup. Disease management mastery appeared to be an important contributor to glycemic control for all patient subgroups.
KeywordsGlycemic Control Diabetes Care Diabetes Registry Illness Burden Interpersonal Care
This work was supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grants # 1051084 and #59758), Princeton, New Jersey, The NovoNordisk Foundation, Corporate Diabetes Programmes, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark, and the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK69846 and K01DK078939), Building 31. Rm 9A06, 31 Center Drive, MSC 2560 Bethesda, MD 20892–2560, USA.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 7.Tsai AC, Morton SC, Mangione CM, Keeler EB. A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses. Am J Manage Healthc. 2005;11(8):478–488.Google Scholar
- 8.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). National Healthcare Disparities Report. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.Google Scholar
- 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.Google Scholar
- 13.National Committee for Quality Assurance. The State of Health Care Quality 2009: Value, Variation and Vulnerable Populations. Washington, D.C.: National Committee for Quality Assurance; 2009.Google Scholar
- 26.National Committee for Quality Assurance. Diabetes Recognition Program. 2011.Google Scholar
- 30.McEwen LN, Kim C, Ettner SL, Herman WH, Karter AJ, Beckles GL, et al. Competing demands for time and self-care behaviors, processes of care, and intermediate outcomes among people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011.Google Scholar
- 40.Kaplan SH, Dukes KA, Sullivan LM, Tripp TJ, Greenfield S. Is passivity a risk factor for poor health outcomes? J Gen Int Med. 1996;11(Supp 1):76.Google Scholar
- 45.AHRQ: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.Google Scholar
- 49.Swanson D, Norcini J, Kaplan S, Carter W, Ware J, and the ABIM PSQ Investigators. Final Report of the PSQ Project. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1989.Google Scholar
- 50.Greenfield S, Billimek J, Kaplan SH. The total illness burden index: a patient-reported summary measure of multimorbidity. In: Preedy VR, Watson RR, eds. Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
- 53.Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Nimrod; 1993.Google Scholar
- 54.California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2003 Methodology Series: Report 2–2003 Data Collection Methods. Available at http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Documents/CHIS2003_method2.pdf. Accessed on April 2, 2013.
- 65.Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE. Assessing diabetes self-management: the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire. In: Bradley C, ed. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes. Newark: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1994:355–356.Google Scholar
- 71.Maly RC, Stein JA, Umezawa Y, Leake B, Douglas AM. Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer outcomes among older patients: effects of physician communication and patient empowerment. Health Psychol: Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2008;27(6):728–736.Google Scholar
- 73.Cooper LA, Roter DL. Patient–provider communication: the effect of race and ethnicity on process and outcomes of healthcare. In: Smedley B, Stith A, Nelson A, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003:552–593.Google Scholar