Variation in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Readiness for Meaningful Use: 2008–2011
- 1.1k Downloads
Federal initiatives are underway that provide physicians with financial incentives for meaningful use (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) and assistance to purchase and implement EHRs.
We sought to examine readiness and interest in MU among primary care physicians and specialists, and identify factors that may affect their readiness to obtain MU incentives.
We analyzed 4 years of data (2008–2011) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Supplement, an annual cross-sectional nationally representative survey of non-federally employed office-based physicians.
Survey-weighted EHR adoption rates, potential to meet selected MU criteria, and self-reported intention to apply for MU incentives. We also examined the association between physician and practice characteristics and readiness for MU.
The overall sample consisted of 10,889 respondents, with weighted response rates of 62 % (2008); 74 % (2009); 66 % (2010); and 61 % (2011). Primary care physicians’ adoption of EHRs with the potential to meet MU nearly doubled from 2009 to 2011 (18 % to 38 %, p < 0.01), and was significantly higher than specialists (19 %) in 2011 (p < 0.01). In 2011, half of physicians (52 %) expressed their intention to apply for MU incentives; this did not vary by specialty. Multivariate analyses report that EHR adoption was significantly higher in both 2010 and 2011 compared to 2009, and primary care physicians and physicians working in larger or multi-specialty practices or for HMOs were more likely to adopt EHRs with the potential to meet MU.
Physician EHR adoption rates increased in advance of MU incentive payments. Although interest in MU incentives did not vary by specialty, primary care physicians had significantly higher rates of adopting EHRs with the potential to meet MU. Addressing barriers to EHR adoption, which may vary by specialty, will be important to enhancing coordination of care.
KEY WORDSelectronic health records adoption physician primary care meaningful use
- 3.Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic Health Record Systems and Intent to Apply for Meaningful Use Incentives Among Office-Based Physician Practices: United States, 2001–2011. NCHS Data Brief, No79. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2011.Google Scholar
- 12.Hsiao CJ, Beatty PC, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA, Sisk JE. Electronic medical record/electronic health record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008 and preliminary 2009. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-stat.Google Scholar
- 13.Hsiao CJ, Burt CW, Rechsteiner E, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Sisk JE. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008; 2008. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-stat.Google Scholar
- 15.National Center for Health Statistics. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Microdatafile; 2008.Google Scholar
- 19.Corey C Grossman JM. Clinical Information Technology Adoption Varies Across Physician Specialties. Center for Health System Change; 2007; 34.Google Scholar
- 22.US. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Regional Extension Centers. ONC’s Regional Extension Centers Sign Up 100,000 Primary Care Providers. Available at:.(http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/regional-extension-centers/rec-primary-care-providers/). Accessed November 15, 2012.
- 26.Kern LM, Barrón Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Edwards A, Kaushal R; with the HITEC Investigators. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2237-8.
- 32.Cai B, Shimizu I. Electronic Medical Record Systems Nonresponse Bias Analysis for 2011 NAMCS Mail Survey. Joint Statistical Meeting; 2012.Google Scholar
- 33.Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, Woodwell D, Palso K, Rechtsteiner E. Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief, No 98. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.Google Scholar