Unannounced Standardized Patient Assessment of the Roter Interaction Analysis System: The Challenge of Measuring Patient-Centered Communication
- 584 Downloads
Despite wide-spread endorsement of patient-centered communication (PCC) in health care, there has been little evidence that it leads to positive change in health outcomes. The lack of correlation may be due either to an overestimation of the value of PCC or to a measurement problem. If PCC measures do not capture elements of the interaction that determine whether the resulting care plan is patient-centered, they will confound efforts to link PCC to outcomes.
To evaluate whether one widely used measure of PCC, the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS), captures patient-centered care planning.
RIAS was employed in the coding of unannounced standardized patient (USP) encounters that were scripted so that the failure to address patient contextual factors would result in an ineffective plan of care. The design enabled an assessment of whether RIAS can differentiate between communication behavior that does and does not result in a care plan that takes into account a patient’s circumstances and needs.
Eight actors role playing four scripted cases (one African American and one Caucasian for each case) in 399 visits to 111 internal medicine attending physicians.
RIAS measures included composites for physician utterance types and (in separate models) two different previously applied RIAS patient-centeredness summary composites. The gold standard comparison measure was whether the physician’s treatment plan, as abstracted from the visit note, successfully addressed the patient’s problem. Mixed effects regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between RIAS measures and USP measured performance, controlling for a variety of design features.
None of the RIAS measures of PCC differentiated encounters in which care planning was patient-centered from care planning in which it was not.
RIAS, which codes each utterance during a visit into mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories, does not differentiate between conversations leading to and not leading to care plans that accommodate patients’ circumstances and needs.
KEY WORDSpatient-centered communication medical decision making performance assessment
Conflict of Interest
Alan Schwartz and Saul Weiner are owners of a company that provides management consulting services to health care providers and institutions interested in collecting customer service and performance data using methods employed in this study (unannounced standardized patients). They have not to date received consulting fees, honorarium, contracts or other payments. The remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
This study was supported by Veteran Affairs, Health Services Research and Development.
- 2.Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 9.RIASWORKS. http://www.riasworks.com/resources_a.html. (Last accessed Aug 28, 2012).