Determinants of Readiness for Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) in the VA Health Care System
Depression management can be challenging for primary care (PC) settings. While several evidence-based models exist for depression care, little is known about the relationships between PC practice characteristics, model characteristics, and the practice’s choices regarding model adoption.
We examined three Veterans Affairs (VA)-endorsed depression care models and tested the relationships between theoretically-anchored measures of organizational readiness and implementation of the models in VA PC clinics.
1) Qualitative assessment of the three VA-endorsed depression care models, 2) Cross-sectional survey of leaders from 225 VA medium-to-large PC practices, both in 2007.
We assessed PC readiness factors related to resource adequacy, motivation for change, staff attributes, and organizational climate. As outcomes, we measured implementation of one of the VA-endorsed models: collocation, Translating Initiatives in Depression into Effective Solutions (TIDES), and Behavioral Health Lab (BHL). We performed bivariate and, when possible, multivariate analyses of readiness factors for each model.
Collocation is a relatively simple arrangement with a mental health specialist physically located in PC. TIDES and BHL are more complex; they use standardized assessments and care management based on evidence-based collaborative care principles, but with different organizational requirements. By 2007, 107 (47.5 %) clinics had implemented collocation, 39 (17.3 %) TIDES, and 17 (7.6 %) BHL. Having established quality improvement processes (OR 2.30, [1.36, 3.87], p = 0.002) or a depression clinician champion (OR 2.36, [1.14, 4.88], p = 0.02) was associated with collocation. Being located in a VA regional network that endorsed TIDES (OR 8.42, [3.69, 19.26], p < 0.001) was associated with TIDES implementation. The presence of psychologists or psychiatrists on PC staff, greater financial sufficiency, or greater spatial sufficiency was associated with BHL implementation.
Both readiness factors and characteristics of depression care models influence model adoption. Greater model simplicity may make collocation attractive within local quality improvement efforts. Dissemination through regional networks may be effective for more complex models such as TIDES.
KEY WORDSprimary care mental health depression collaborative care implementation readiness
- 2.Singleton N, Bumpstead R, O’Brien M, Lee A, Meltzer H. Office of National Statistics: Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, 2000. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2001.Google Scholar
- 3.World Health Organization. Mental health: Depression. 2011; http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/definition/en/. Accessed August 21, 2012.
- 28.Hamilton AB, Cohen AN, Young AS. Organizational readiness in specialty mental health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;25(Suppl 1):27–31.Google Scholar
- 30.VHA Handbook 1160.01 Uniform Mental Health Services in VA Medical Centers and Clinics. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs: Office of Patient Care Services; 2008.Google Scholar
- 38.Post EP, Kilbourne AM, Bremer RW, Solano FX, Jr, Pincus HA, Reynolds CF, III. Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings. Implement Sci. 2009;4:84.Google Scholar
- 41.Bower P, Knowles S, Coventry PA, Rowland N. Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care (Review). Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2011(9).Google Scholar
- 44.Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 45.Yano E, Fleming B, Canelo, et al. National Survey Results for the Primary Care Director Module of the VHA Clinical Practice Organizational Survey. Sepulveda, CA: VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior; 2008.Google Scholar
- 46.Chou A, Rose D, Farmer M, Canelo I, Rubenstein L, Yano E. Organizational Factors Affecting the Likelihood of CancerScreening among VA Patients. Paper presented at: 13th Annual Healthcare Organizational Research Association (HORA) ConferenceJune 2011; Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- 47.Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 48.Groves R, Fowler F Jr, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.Google Scholar
- 49.Area Resource File (ARF). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions; 2008.Google Scholar
- 50.Department of Veterans Affairs. Office of Academic Affiliations. http://www.va.gov/oaa/. Accessed Aug 21, 2012.
- 51.Agresti A, Franklin C. Statistics: The art and science of learning from data. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.Google Scholar
- 53.Improving Chronic Illness Care. 1996-2012; The MacColl Center. The Improving Chronic Illness Care program is supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with direction and technical assistance provided by Group Health’s MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation. Available at: http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/. Accessed Aug 21, 2012.
- 60.Shortell S, O’Brien J, Carman J, et al. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept vs implementation. Heal Serv Res. 1995;30(2):377–401.Google Scholar
- 61.Collaborative Care for Depression in the Primary Care Setting: a primer on VA’s Translating Initiatives for Depression into Effective Solutions (TIDES) Project. In: VA Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Dept of Veterans Affairs, ed. Washington, DC 2008.Google Scholar