Experiencing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Gender Matters, A National Study
- 2.3k Downloads
Energized and productive faculty are critical to academic medicine, yet studies indicate a lack of advancement and senior roles for women.
Using measures of key aspects of the culture of academic medicine, this study sought to identify similarity and dissimilarity between perceptions of the culture by male and female faculty.
The C - Change Faculty Survey was used to collect data on perceptions of organizational culture.
A stratified random sample of 4,578 full-time faculty at 26 nationally representative US medical colleges (response rate 52 %). 1,271 (53 %) of respondents were female.
Factor analysis assisted in the creation of scales assessing dimensions of the culture, which served as the key outcomes. Regression analysis identified gender differences while controlling for other demographic characteristics.
Compared with men, female faculty reported a lower sense of belonging and relationships within the workplace (T = −3.30, p < 0.01). Self-efficacy for career advancement was lower in women (T = −4.73, p < 0.001). Women perceived lower gender equity (T = −19.82, p < 0.001), and were less likely to believe their institutions were making changes to address diversity goals (T = −9.70, p < 0.001). Women were less likely than men to perceive their institution as family-friendly (T = −4.06, p < 0.001), and women reported less congruence between their own values and those of their institutions (T = −2.06, p < 0.05). Women and men did not differ significantly on levels of engagement, leadership aspirations, feelings of ethical/moral distress, perception of institutional commitment to faculty advancement, or perception of institutional change efforts to improve support for faculty.
Faculty men and women are equally engaged in their work and share similar leadership aspirations. However, medical schools have failed to create and sustain an environment where women feel fully accepted and supported to succeed; how can we ensure that medical schools are fully using the talent pool of a third of its faculty?
KEY WORDSculture academic medicine female faculty gender
The authors wish to thank all the members of the C - Change research team who participated in developing items for the survey, data collection and supporting the process of C - Change work. The authors thank the AAMC for assisting in the initial phase of the project. The authors are indebted to the medical faculty who generously shared their perspectives in the survey.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the critical funding support of the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation and Brandeis University Women’s Studies Research Center. Funding supported the design and conduct of the study; and collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data. Supplemental funds to support data analysis were provided by the U.S. Health and Human Services Office of Public Health and Science, Office on Women’s Health, and Office of Minority Health; National Institutes of Health, Office of Research on Women’s Health; the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources and Services Administration.
The C - Change Faculty Survey and its items, described in this report, are copyrighted by C - Change, Brandeis University. Please contact email@example.com to use this survey.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 2.Corrice AM, Fox S, Bunton SA. Retention of full-time clinical M.D. faculty at US medical schools. Analysis in Brief. Washington DC: AAMC. 2011;11(2):1–2.Google Scholar
- 3.Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). https://www.aamc.org/download/170264/data/2009_table05.pdf Accessed August 5, 2012.
- 4.Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). https://www.aamc.org/download/170274/data/2009_table09a.pdf. Accessed August 5, 2012.
- 5.Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 2011 AAMC data book: Medical schools and teaching hospitals by the numbers. https://www.aamc.org/data/databook. Accessed August 5, 2012.
- 13.National Academy of Sciences; National Academies of Engineering; Institute of Medicine Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 24.Pololi LH. A prescription for diversifying medical faculties. Chron High Educ. September 24, 2010. B32–34.Google Scholar
- 26.Pololi LH. Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine. Perspectives of Women Faculty. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 31.Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute. http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/pubtype.php Accessed 8/5/12.
- 32.University of Michigan ADVANCE program. http://www.advance.rackham.umich.edu/climatesurvey1.pdf. Accessed 8/5/12.
- 33.Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger PW. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv Methodol. 2001;27:85–95.Google Scholar
- 35.Hatcher L. A Step-by step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary: SAS Institute; 1994.Google Scholar
- 38.Lent R, Brown S, Larkin K. Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. J Couns Psychol [serial online]. 1986;33(3):265–269. Available from: PsycINFO, Ipswich, MA. Accessed July 9, 2012.Google Scholar
- 39.Lent R, Brown S, Larkin K. Comparison of three theoretically derived variables in predicting career and academic behavior: self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequence thinking. J Couns Psychol [serial online]. 1987;34(3):293–298. Available from: PsycINFO, Ipswich, MA. Accessed July 9, 2012.Google Scholar
- 41.Lips HM. A New Psychology of Women: Gender, Culture and Ethnicity. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2006:123.Google Scholar
- 48.Lowenstein SR, Fernandez G, Crane LA. Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7(37):1–8.Google Scholar
- 52.Stewart AJ, Dottolo AL. Socialization to the academy: coping with competing social identities. In: Downey G, Dweck C, Eccles J, Chatman C, eds. Navigating the Future: social Identity, Coping and Life Tasks. New York: Russell Sage; 2005:167–187.Google Scholar
- 54.Tierney WG, Rhoads RA. Faculty socialization as a cultural process: a mirror of institutional commitment. ASHE-ERIC Higher Educ Rep. 1994;93:29.Google Scholar
- 55.Weidman JC, Twale DJ, Stein EL. Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: a perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Educ Rep. 2001; 28.Google Scholar