Impact of Information Leaflets on Behavior of Patients with Gastroenteritis or Tonsillitis: A Cluster Randomized Trial in French Primary Care
- 349 Downloads
To assess the impact of four patient information leaflets on patients’ behavior in primary care.
Cluster randomized multicenter controlled trial between November 2009 and January 2011.
French adults and children consulting a participating primary care physician and diagnosed with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis. Patients were randomized to receive patient information leaflets or not, according to the cluster randomization of their primary care physician.
Adult patients or adults accompanying a child diagnosed with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis were informed of the study. Physicians in the intervention group gave patients an information leaflet about their condition. Two weeks after the consultation patients (or their accompanying adult) answered a telephone questionnaire on their behavior and knowledge about the condition.
The main and secondary outcomes, mean behavior and knowledge scores respectively, were calculated from the replies to this questionnaire.
Twenty-four physicians included 400 patients. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up (3 %). In the group that received the patient information leaflet, patient behavior was closer to that recommended by the guidelines than in the control group (mean behavior score 4.9 versus 4.2, p < 0.01). Knowledge was better for adults receiving the leaflet than in the control group (mean knowledge score 4.2 versus 3.6, p < 0.01). There were fewer visits for the same symptoms by household members of patients given leaflets (23.4 % vs. 56.2 %, p < 0.01).
Patient information leaflets given by the physician during the consultation significantly modify the patient’s behavior and knowledge of the disease, compared with patients not receiving the leaflets, for the conditions studied.
KEY WORDSpatient information leaflet primary care general practice patient behavior knowledge about disease
We thank Carole Rolland for managing the study (Grenoble CIC) and Aurélia Meneau for participating in the study design. We also thank Philippe Eveillard for critically reading the manuscript. We thank the following physicians for their participation: Baud N, Blanckemane M, Boivin JE, Brin M, Constans D, Corchia L, Dauphin D, Demaret F, D’Herouville C, Dubayle V, Folacci JL, Gamby A, Gandiol J, Genthon A, Gozlan E, Guetta B, Lagabrielle D, Lamy D, Leclercq A, Moulle C, Lambert P, Magnen L, Menuret H, Poucel F, Rony N, Schihin R, Triviella F, Verjus P, Vignoulle JL, and Zerbib Y for joining us in the expert committee
The study was supported by the Grenoble Clinical Research Centre, which is financed by INSERM and French hospital funding, both belonging to the public sector. Neither INSERM nor the hospital influenced the study design, analysis or interpretation of results.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 8.Sustersic M, Voorhoeve M, Menuret H, Baudrant M, Meneau A, Bosson JL. Fiches d’information pour les patients: quel intérêt? L’étude EDIMAP. La Rev méd gén. 2010;276:332–9.Google Scholar
- 12.Department of Health. Better information, better choices, better health: putting information at the center of health. 2004; Available at: ttp://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/DH_4098576 (last accessed June 2012).
- 13.HAS. Methodology guide: How to produce an information brochure for patients and users of the healthcare system. Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_430286 (last accessed June 2012).
- 23.Coudeyre E, Givron P, Vanbiervliet W, et al. The role of an information booklet or oral information about back pain in reducing disability and fear-avoidance beliefs among patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. A randomized controlled trial in a rehabilitation unit. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006;49(8):600–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sustersic M, Meneau A, Dremont R, Bosson JL. Fiches d’information patient: quelle méthodologie? La rev prat Méd gén. 2007;790:1167–8.Google Scholar
- 29.HAS. Guide méthodologique - Bases méthodologiques pour l’élaboration de recommandations professionnelles par consensus formalisé. Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_240386 (last accessed June 2012).
- 30.World Health Organization - Europe. Therapeutic Patient Education - Continuing Education Programmes for HealthCare Providers in the Field of Prevention of Chronic Diseases. 1998; www.euro.who.int/document/e63674.pdf (last accessed June 2012)