Transferred and Delayed Care of Patients with Colorectal Cancer in a Safety-Net Hospital System—Manifestations of a Distressed Healthcare System
- 118 Downloads
Safety-net hospital systems provide care to a large proportion of United States’ under- and uninsured population. We have witnessed delayed colorectal cancer (CRC) care in this population and sought to identify demographic and systemic differences in these patients compared to those in an insured health-care system.
Design, Patients, and Approach/Measurements
We collected demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data from 2005–2007 on all patients with CRC seen at Parkland Health and Hospital System (PHHS), a safety-net health system and at Presbyterian Hospital Dallas System (Presbyterian), a community health system, and compared characteristics among the two health-care systems. Variables associated with advanced stage were identified with multivariate logistic regression analysis and odds ratios were calculated.
Three hundred and eighteen patients at PHHS and 397 patients at Presbyterian with CRC were identified. An overwhelming majority (75 %) of patients seen at the safety-net were diagnosed after being seen in the emergency department or at an outside facility. These patients had a higher percentage of stage 4 disease compared to the community. Patients within the safety-net with Medicare/private insurance had lower rates of advanced disease than uninsured patients (25 % vs. 68 %, p < 0.001). Insurance status and physician encounter resulting in diagnosis were independent predictors of disease stage at diagnosis.
A large proportion of patients seen in the safety-net health system were transferred from outside systems after diagnosis, thus leading to delayed care. This delay in care drove advanced stage at diagnosis. The data point to a pervasive and systematic issue in patients with CRC and have fundamental health policy implications for population-based CRC screening.
KEY WORDSheath disparity health policy populations at risk race ethnic
- 1.Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008: CA.2007.0018.Google Scholar
- 3.Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149(9): 627–37.Google Scholar
- 4.CDC: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. In: (CDC) CfDCaP, ed. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007.Google Scholar
- 10.Farmer MM, Bastani R, Kwan L, Belman M, Ganz PA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening from patients enrolled in a managed care health plan. Cancer 2008; 112(6):1230–8.Google Scholar
- 12.Geiger TM, Miedema BW, Geana MV, Thaler K, Rangnekar NJ, Cameron GT. Improving rates for screening colonoscopy: Analysis of the health information national trends survey (HINTS I) data. Surg Endosc 22(2):527–33.Google Scholar
- 14.Lewin M, Altman S, eds. America's Health Care Safety Net: Intact but Endangered: Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Acadamies Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- 21.The Uninsured in Texas. 5/5/2008 ed: Texas Medical Association, 2008.Google Scholar
- 22.Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in active labor. 131: S13902-S13904. Congressional Record: Congressional Record, 1985.Google Scholar
- 27.Halpern MT, Pavluck AL, Ko CY, Ward EM. Factors Associated with Colon Cancer Stage at Diagnosis. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 2680–93.Google Scholar
- 30.Rapid Response Surveillance Studies. National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
- 31.American Community Survey: Accuracy of the Data. In: Bureau USC, ed.Google Scholar
- 33.Korda RJ, Butler JRG, Clements MS, Kunitz SJ. Differential impacts of health care in Australia: trend analysis of socioeconomic inequalities in avoidable mortality. Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36(1):157–65.Google Scholar
- 35.Parkland Hospital. Parkland Hospital at a Glance: Who We Are. http://www.parklandhospital.com/whoweare/at_a_glance/. Accessed April 4, 2012.
- 36.Pestonjee S et al. The Reading Level Determination Study: Parkland Health & Hospital System. Parkland Health & Hospital System, 1998. http://www.parklandhospital.com/patients_visitors/health_information/pdf/Rdg%20Stdy%20Abstr.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2012.
- 37.DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2008; 60–235.Google Scholar
- 39.United States Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.Google Scholar