Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 1105–1111 | Cite as

Delayed and Forgone Care for Families with Chronic Conditions in High-Deductible Health Plans

  • Alison A. GalbraithEmail author
  • Stephen B. Soumerai
  • Dennis Ross-Degnan
  • Meredith B. Rosenthal
  • Charlene Gay
  • Tracy A. Lieu
Original Research



High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) are an increasingly common strategy to contain health care costs. Individuals with chronic conditions are at particular risk for increased out-of-pocket costs in HDHPs and resulting cost-related underuse of essential health care.


To evaluate whether families with chronic conditions in HDHPs have higher rates of delayed or forgone care due to cost, compared with those in traditional health insurance plans.


This mail and phone survey used multiple logistic regression to compare family-level rates of reporting delayed/forgone care in HDHPs vs. traditional plans.


We selected families with children that had at least one member with a chronic condition. Families had employer-sponsored insurance in a Massachusetts health plan and >12 months of enrollment in an HDHP or a traditional plan.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was report of any delayed or forgone care due to cost (acute care, emergency department visits, chronic care, checkups, or tests) for adults or children during the prior 12 months.


Respondents included 208 families in HDHPs and 370 in traditional plans. Membership in an HDHP and lower income were each independently associated with higher probability of delayed/forgone care due to cost. For adult family members, the predicted probability of delayed/forgone care due to cost was higher in HDHPs than in traditional plans [40.0% vs 15.1% among families with incomes <400% of the federal poverty level (FPL) and 16.0% vs 4.8% among those with incomes ≥400% FPL]. Similar associations were observed for children.


Among families with chronic conditions, reporting of delayed/forgone care due to cost is higher for both adults and children in HDHPs than in traditional plans. Families with lower incomes are also at higher risk for delayed/forgone care.


health insurance deductible cost sharing utilization health policy 



The authors thank Christopher Forrest, Bruce Landon, and Carol Cosenza for guidance in the design of the survey instrument; Christopher Forrest and Linda Dunbar for making the Chronic Condition Checklist available and assisting with its use; Irina Miroshnik for help with data collection and interpretation; and the team of research assistants for their help in conducting the survey.


This study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO) Initiative. Additional support for the survey was provided by the Center for Child Health Care Studies, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School. Dr Galbraith’s effort was supported in part by a K23 Mentored Career Development Award from NICHD (HD052742). Drs. Soumerai and Ross-Degnan are investigators in the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research in Therapeutics and are supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant no. U18HS010391). The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.

Prior Presentations

An abstract based on this research was presented at the 2010 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia, and at the 2010 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting in Boston, MA, as a poster.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Galbraith has received support for a separate research project from the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation through a Faculty Grant.


  1. 1.
    Claxton G, DiJulio B, Whitmore H, et al. Job-based health insurance: costs climb at a moderate pace. Health Aff. 2009;28(6):w1002–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. Summary of New Health Reform Law. 2010; Accessed Dec 13, 2011.
  3. 3.
    Lee TH, Zapert K. Do high-deductible health plans threaten quality of care? N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1202–1204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Committee on Child Health Financing. High-deductible health plans and the new risks of consumer-driven health insurance products. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):622–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen R. Impact of Type of Insurance Plan on Access and Utilization of Health Care Services for Adults Aged 18–64 Years With Private Health Insurance: United States, 2007–2008: NCHS Data Brief No. 28;2010.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fronstin P, Collins SR. Findings from the 2007 EBRI/Commonwealth Fund Consumerism in Health Survey. 2008. Accessed Dec 13, 2011.
  7. 7.
    Galbraith AA, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai SB, Rosenthal MB, Gay C, Lieu TA. Nearly half of families in high-deductible health plans whose members have chronic conditions face substantial financial burden. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(2):322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunbar L. Alternative Methods of Identifying Children with Special Health Care Needs: Implications for Medicaid Programs: University of Maryland; 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bethell C, Read D, Stein R, Blumberg S, Wells N, Newacheck P. Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Ambul Pediatr. 2002:38-48.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson GF. Physician, public, and policymaker perspectives on chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):437–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gawande AA, Blendon R, Brodie M, Benson JM, Levitt L, Hugick L. Does dissatisfaction with health plans stem from having no choices? Health Aff (Millwood). 1998;17(5):184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braitman LE, Rosenbaum PR. Rare outcomes, common treatments: analytic strategies using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:693–695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurth T, Walker AM, Glynn RJ, et al. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(3):262–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cherkin DC, Grothaus L, Wagner EH. Is magnitude of co-payment effect related to income? Using census data for health services research. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(1):33–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hibbard JH, Greene J, Tusler M. Does enrollment in a CDHP stimulate cost-effective utilization? Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(4):437–449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newhouse JP and the Insurance Experiment Group. Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alexander G, Casalino L, Meltzer D. Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. JAMA. 2003;290(7):953–958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lieu T, Solomon J, Sabin J, Kullgren J, Hinrichsen V, Galbraith A. Consumer awareness and strategies among families with high-deductible health plans. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(3).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Claxton G, DiJulio B, Whitmore H, et al. Health benefits in 2010: premiums rise modestly, workers pay more toward coverage. Health Aff. 2010;29(10):1942–1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McDonough JE, Rosman B, Butt M, Tucker L, Howe LK. Massachusetts health reform implementation: major progress and future challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(4):w285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fendrick AM, Chernew ME. Value-based insurance design: a "clinically sensitive, fiscally responsible" approach to mitigate the adverse clinical effects of high-deductible consumer-directed health plans. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):890–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Galbraith A, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai S, et al. Use of well-child visits in high-deductible health plans. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(11):833–840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rowe JW, Brown-Stevenson T, Downey RL, Newhouse JP. The effect of consumer-directed health plans on the use of preventive and chronic illness services. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(1):113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wharam JF, Galbraith AA, Kleinman KP, Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Landon BE. Cancer screening before and after switching to a high-deductible health plan. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(9):647–655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Recommended Preventive Services. 2010; Accessed Dec 13, 2011.
  26. 26.
    Beeuwkes Buntin M, Haviland AM, McDevitt R, Sood N. Healthcare spending and preventive care in high-deductible and consumer-directed health plans. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(3):222–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reed M, Fung V, Price M, et al. High-deductible health insurance plans: efforts to sharpen a blunt instrument. Health Aff. 2009;28(4):1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cunningham PJ, Miller C, Cassil A. Living on the Edge: Health Care Expenses Strain Family Budgets. Research Brief No. 10: Center for Studying Health Systems Change; December 2008.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schoen C, Collins SR, Kriss JL, Doty MM. How many are underinsured? Trends among US adults, 2003 and 2007. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(4):w298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tu HT, Cohen G. Financial and Health Burdens of Chronic Conditions Grow. Tracking Report No. 24. 2009. Accessed Dec 13, 2011.

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison A. Galbraith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephen B. Soumerai
    • 2
  • Dennis Ross-Degnan
    • 2
  • Meredith B. Rosenthal
    • 3
  • Charlene Gay
    • 1
  • Tracy A. Lieu
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Child Health Care Studies, Department of Population MedicineHarvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care InstituteBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Population MedicineHarvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care InstituteBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  4. 4.Division of General PediatricsChildren’s Hospital BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations