A Validation Study of the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes Scale (SKILLD)
- First Online:
- 266 Downloads
In 2005 the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale (SKILLD) was introduced as a diabetes knowledge test. The SKILLD has not been validated since its introduction.
To perform a validation analysis on the SKILLD.
DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS
Cross-sectional observational study of 240 patients with diabetes at an academic family practice center.
SKILLD’s correlation with an oral form of the Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT) was used to assess criterion validity. A regression model tested construct validity, hypothesizing that SKILLD score was independently related to health literacy and education level. Content validity was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha for inter-item relatedness and by comparing SKILLD items with the content of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) diabetes education website. We assessed inter-rater reliability and bias using Spearman correlation coefficients and sign-rank tests between interviewers scoring the same interview.
The SKILLD demonstrated fair correlation with the DKT (Pearson’s coefficient 0.54, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.66, p < 0.001). Health literacy, education level, male gender, household income, and years with diabetes were independent predictors of SKILLD score in the regression model. Cronbach’s Alpha for inter-item relatedness was 0.54. There were some topics on the NIH website not addressed by the SKILLD. The inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.79 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.91, p < 0.001).
The SKILLD is an adequate diabetes knowledge test and is appropriate for people of all literacy levels. However, it should be expanded to more completely evaluate diabetes knowledge.
KEY WORDSdiabetes knowledge health literacy diabetes education validation
- 1.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics fact sheet: General information and national estimates of diabetes in the United States, 2005. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health; 2005.Google Scholar
- 3.Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009. Diabetes Care 2009;32 Suppl 1:S13-61.Google Scholar
- 11.Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD003417.Google Scholar
- 13.Hawthorne K, Robles Y, Cannings-John R, Edwards AG. Culturally appropriate health education for type 2 diabetes mellitus in ethnic minority groups. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD006424.Google Scholar
- 23.Duke SA, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD005268.Google Scholar
- 29.Berkman N, DeWalt D, Pignone M, et al. Literacy and Health Outcomes. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87 (Prepared by RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E007-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. January 2004.Google Scholar
- 42.Wolff K, Cavanaugh K, Malone R, et al. The Diabetes Literacy and Numeracy Education Toolkit (DLNET): materials to facilitate diabetes education and management in patients with low literacy and numeracy skills. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:233–6, 38–41, 44–5.Google Scholar
- 46.National Diabetes Education Program. Available at: http://www.ndep.nih.gov/. Accessed September 13, 2011.