A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Literacy-Sensitive Self-Management Intervention for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients
- 709 Downloads
Low literacy skills are common and associated with a variety of poor health outcomes. This may be particularly important in patients with chronic illnesses such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that require appropriate inhaler technique to maintain quality of life and avoid exacerbations.
To explore the impact of a literacy-sensitive self-management intervention on inhaler technique scores in COPD patients and to determine if effects differ by literacy.
Randomized controlled trial.
Ninety-nine patients with COPD.
Patients were randomly assigned to a one-on-one self-management educational intervention or usual care. The intervention focused on inhaler technique, smoking cessation, and using a COPD action plan.
At baseline, an inhaler technique assessment, literacy assessment, health-related quality of life questionnaires, and pulmonary function tests were completed. Inhaler technique was re-evaluated after two to eight weeks.
Mean age 63, 65% female, 69% Caucasian, moderate COPD severity on average, 36% with low literacy, moderately impaired health-related quality of life, and similar baseline metered dose inhaler technique scores. Patients in the intervention group had greater mean improvement from baseline in metered dose inhaler technique score compared to those in the usual care group (difference in mean change 2.1, 95% CI 1.1, 3.0). The patients in the intervention group also had greater mean improvements in metered dose inhaler technique score than those in the usual care group whether they had low health literacy (difference in mean change 2.8, 95% CI 0.6, 4.9) or higher health literacy (1.8, 95% CI 0.7, 2.9).
A literacy-sensitive self-management intervention can lead to improvements in inhaler technique, with benefits for patients with both low and higher health literacy.
KEY WORDSCOPD inhaler technique health literacy self-management randomized controlled trial
- 1.National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Morbidity and Mortality: 2009 Chartbook on Cardiovascular, Lung, and Blood Diseases.Google Scholar
- 3.Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, Committee on Health Literacy. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 7.Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: Selden CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, eds. National Library of Medicine Current Bibliographies in Medicine: Health Literacy. Vol. NLM, Pub. No CBM 2000-1. 2000. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive//20061214/pubs/cbm/hliteracy.html (accessed August 25, 2011).
- 17.Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med. 1991;85 Suppl B:25-31, 33–7.Google Scholar
- 18.Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1996.Google Scholar
- 19.McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading – a new readability formula. J Reading. 1969;12:639–46.Google Scholar
- 28.Epstein SW, Manning CPR, Ashley MJ, Corey PN. Survey of the clinical use of pressurized aerosol inhalers. CMA Journal. 1979;120:813–6.Google Scholar