Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 987–994

Association Between Quality of Care and the Sociodemographic Composition of Physicians’ Patient Panels: A Repeat Cross-Sectional Analysis

  • Emily R. Carrier
  • Eric Schneider
  • Hoangmai H. Pham
  • Peter B. Bach
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Pay-for-performance programs could worsen health disparities if providers who care for disadvantaged patients face systematic barriers to providing high-quality care. Risk adjustment that includes sociodemographic factors could mitigate the financial incentive to avoid disadvantaged patients.

OBJECTIVE

To test for associations between quality of care and the composition of a physician’s patient panel.

DESIGN

Repeat cross-sectional analysis

PARTICIPANTS

Nationally representative sample of US primary care physicians responding to a panel telephone survey in 2000–2001 and 2004–2005

MAIN MEASURES

Quality of primary care as measured by provision of eight recommended preventive services (diabetic monitoring [hemoglobin A1c testing, eye examinations, cholesterol testing and urine protein analysis], cancer screening [screening colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy and mammography], and vaccinations against influenza and pneumococcus) documented in Medicare claims data and the association between quality and the sociodemographic composition of physicians’ patient panels.

KEY RESULTS

Across eight quality measures, physicians’ quality of care was not consistently associated with the composition of their patient panel either in a single year or between time periods. For example, a substantial number (seven) of the eighteen significant associations seen between sociodemographic characteristics and the delivery of preventive services in the first time period were no longer seen in the second time period. Among sociodemographic characteristics, panel Medicaid eligibility was most consistently associated with differences in the delivery of preventive services between time points; among preventive services, the delivery of influenza vaccine was most likely to demonstrate disparities in both time points.

CONCLUSIONS

In a Medicare pay-for-performance program, a better understanding of the effect of effect of patient panel composition on physicians’ quality of care may be necessary before implementing routine statistical adjustment, since the association of quality and sociodemographic composition is small and inconsistent. In addition, we observed improvements between time periods among physicians with varying panel composition.

KEY WORDS

quality disparities payment incentives 

References

  1. 1.
    Casalino L, Elster A. Will pay for performance and quality reporting Affect health care disparities? Health Aff. 2007;26:W405–W414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smedley, B Stith Y and Nelson R, eds. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schneider EC, Zaslavsky A, Epstein A. Racial disparities in the quality of care for enrollees in Medicare managed care. JAMA. 2002;287:1288–1294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Warner R. Does pay for performance steal from the poor and give to the rich? Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:340–341.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jha A, Orav E, Epstein A. The effect of financial incentives on hospitals that serve poor patients. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:299–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bach P, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate R, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:575–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hong C, Atlas S, Chang Y, Subramanian S, Ashburner J, Barry M, et al. Relationship between patient panel providers and primary care physician clinical performance rankings. JAMA. 2010;304:1107–1113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trivedi A, Zaslavsky A, Schneider E, Ayanian J. Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in managed care. New Engl J Med. 2005;353:692–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franks P, Fiscella K, Meldrum S. Racial disparities in the content of primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:599–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gornick M. A decade of research on disparities in Medicare utilization: lessons for the health and health care of vulnerable men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(Supp 1):753–759.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pham HH, Schrag D, Hargraves JL, Bach PB. Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA. 2005;294:473–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalbunde C, Potosky A, Legler J, Warren L. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1258–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    AQA Approved Quality Measures.http://www.aqaalliance.org/performancewg.htm, and NQF Endorsed Standards. http://qualityforum.org/Measures_List.aspx. Both viewed April 21, 2011.
  14. 14.
    Friedberg M, Safran D, Coltin K, Dresser M, Schneider E. Paying for performance in primary care: potential impact of practices and disparities. Health Aff. 2010;29(5):1–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenthal M, Dudley R. Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care? JAMA. 2007;297:740–744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fiscella K. Commentary—anatomy of racial disparity in influenza vaccination. HSR: Health Services Research. 2005;40:539–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang J, Huang E, Drum M, Kirchhof A, Schlichting J, Schaefer C, et al. Insurance Status and Quality of Diabetes Care in Community Health Centers. Am J Public Health. 2008;99:742–747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Broyles R, McAuley W, Baird-Holmes D. The medically vulnerable: their health risks, health status, and use of physician care. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 1999;10:186–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Millet C, Gray J, Wall M and Majeed A. Ethnic disparities in coronary heart disease management and pay for performance in the UK. J Gen Intern Med 24 (1): 8–13.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Millet C, Gray J, Saxena S, Netuveli G, Khunti K and Majeed A. Ethnic disparities and diabetes management and pay-for-performance in the UK: The Wandsworth Prospective Diabetes Study. PLoS Med 4(6): e191Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lauderdale DS, Goldberg J. The expanded racial and ethnic codes in the Medicare data files: their completeness of coverage and accuracy. Am J Publ Health. 1996;86:712–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Waldo DR. Accuracy and bias of race/ethnicity codes in the Medicare enrollment database. Health Care Financing Review Winter 2004–2005; 26: 61–71Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rekhopf DH, et al. Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: a multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989–1991. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:823–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, et al. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily R. Carrier
    • 1
  • Eric Schneider
    • 2
  • Hoangmai H. Pham
    • 3
  • Peter B. Bach
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Studying Health System ChangeWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services7500 Security BlvdBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Center for Health Policy and OutcomesMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations