Association Between Quality of Care and the Sociodemographic Composition of Physicians’ Patient Panels: A Repeat Cross-Sectional Analysis
Pay-for-performance programs could worsen health disparities if providers who care for disadvantaged patients face systematic barriers to providing high-quality care. Risk adjustment that includes sociodemographic factors could mitigate the financial incentive to avoid disadvantaged patients.
To test for associations between quality of care and the composition of a physician’s patient panel.
Repeat cross-sectional analysis
Nationally representative sample of US primary care physicians responding to a panel telephone survey in 2000–2001 and 2004–2005
Quality of primary care as measured by provision of eight recommended preventive services (diabetic monitoring [hemoglobin A1c testing, eye examinations, cholesterol testing and urine protein analysis], cancer screening [screening colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy and mammography], and vaccinations against influenza and pneumococcus) documented in Medicare claims data and the association between quality and the sociodemographic composition of physicians’ patient panels.
Across eight quality measures, physicians’ quality of care was not consistently associated with the composition of their patient panel either in a single year or between time periods. For example, a substantial number (seven) of the eighteen significant associations seen between sociodemographic characteristics and the delivery of preventive services in the first time period were no longer seen in the second time period. Among sociodemographic characteristics, panel Medicaid eligibility was most consistently associated with differences in the delivery of preventive services between time points; among preventive services, the delivery of influenza vaccine was most likely to demonstrate disparities in both time points.
In a Medicare pay-for-performance program, a better understanding of the effect of effect of patient panel composition on physicians’ quality of care may be necessary before implementing routine statistical adjustment, since the association of quality and sociodemographic composition is small and inconsistent. In addition, we observed improvements between time periods among physicians with varying panel composition.
KEY WORDSquality disparities payment incentives
- 2.Smedley, B Stith Y and Nelson R, eds. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2003Google Scholar
- 4.Warner R. Does pay for performance steal from the poor and give to the rich? Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:340–341.Google Scholar
- 10.Gornick M. A decade of research on disparities in Medicare utilization: lessons for the health and health care of vulnerable men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(Supp 1):753–759.Google Scholar
- 14.Friedberg M, Safran D, Coltin K, Dresser M, Schneider E. Paying for performance in primary care: potential impact of practices and disparities. Health Aff. 2010;29(5):1–7.Google Scholar
- 19.Millet C, Gray J, Wall M and Majeed A. Ethnic disparities in coronary heart disease management and pay for performance in the UK. J Gen Intern Med 24 (1): 8–13.Google Scholar
- 20.Millet C, Gray J, Saxena S, Netuveli G, Khunti K and Majeed A. Ethnic disparities and diabetes management and pay-for-performance in the UK: The Wandsworth Prospective Diabetes Study. PLoS Med 4(6): e191Google Scholar
- 22.Waldo DR. Accuracy and bias of race/ethnicity codes in the Medicare enrollment database. Health Care Financing Review Winter 2004–2005; 26: 61–71Google Scholar
- 24.Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, et al. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar