Transitioning Between Electronic Health Records: Effects on Ambulatory Prescribing Safety
- 424 Downloads
Healthcare providers previously using older electronic health records (EHRs) with electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) are transitioning to newer systems to be eligible for federal meaningful use incentives. Little is known about the safety effects of transitioning between systems.
To assess the effect of transitioning between EHR systems on rates and types of prescribing errors, as well as provider perceptions about the effect on prescribing safety.
Prospective, case study of 17 physicians at an academic-affiliated ambulatory clinic from February 2008 through August 2009. All physicians transitioned from an older EHR with minimal clinical decision support (CDS) for e-prescribing to a newer EHR with more robust CDS.
Prescribing errors were identified by standardized prescription and chart review. A novel survey instrument was administered to evaluate provider perceptions about prescribing safety.
We analyzed 1298 prescriptions at baseline, 1331 prescriptions 12 weeks post-implementation, and 1303 prescriptions one year post-implementation. Overall prescribing error rates were highest at baseline (35.7 per 100 prescriptions, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.2–54.8) and lowest one year post-implementation (12.2 per 100 prescriptions, 95% CI 8.6–17.4) (p < 0.001). Improvement in prescribing safety was mainly a result of reducing inappropriate abbreviation errors. However, rates for non-abbreviation prescribing errors were significantly higher at 12 weeks post-implementation than at baseline (17.7 per 100 prescriptions, 95% CI 9.5–33.0 versus 8.5 per 100 prescriptions, 95% CI 4.6-15.9) (p <0.001) and no different at baseline than one year (10.2 per 100 prescriptions, 95% CI 6.2–18.6) (p = 0.337). Survey results complemented quantitative findings.
Results from this case study suggest that transitioning between systems, even to those with more robust CDS, may pose important safety threats. Recognizing the challenges associated with transitions and refining CDS within systems may help maximize safety benefits.
KEY WORDSelectronic prescribing ambulatory transition
The authors thank Dr. Fran Ganz-Lord for her assistance enrolling physicians, and Drs. James Hollenberg and Curtis Cole for assistance in retrieving electronic data. This project was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS017029), Rockville, MD.
This project was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS017029), Rockville, MD.
Conflict of Interest
- 2.The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Accessed April 13, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ARRA_public_review).
- 13.Kaushal R, Kern LM, Barron Y, et al. Electronic Prescribing Improves Medication Safety in Community-Based Office Practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2010.Google Scholar
- 14.Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA, et al. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;6(3):1–39.Google Scholar
- 16.Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008. S3101.Google Scholar
- 17.Grossman JM, Reed MC. Clinical information technology gaps persist among physicians. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2006;(106):1–4.Google Scholar
- 20.eHealth Initiative, Electronic Prescribing Becoming Mainstream Practice, June 2008, http://www.ehealthinitiative.org/uploads/file/eHI%20CIMM%20ePrescribing%20Report%206-10-08%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 23 April 2009).
- 21.Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology; Final Rule. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.Google Scholar
- 23.Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Taps Thomson Healthcare to Improve Clinical Performance and Standards Compliance. PR Newswire 2007 December 22, 2009 [cited; Available from: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-160720130.html. (Accessed March, 2011).
- 26.Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press 2000.Google Scholar
- 27.US Department of Health and Human Services. AHRQ patient safety network: a national patient safety resource. 2011 [cited 2011 March 9]; Available from: http://www.psnet.ahrq.gov/glossary.aspx#C (Accessed March 2011).
- 28.Certification Commission for Health Information Technology. About the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology. 2009 [cited 2009 December 22]; Available from: http://www.cchit.org/about (Accessed March 2011).
- 29.Bates DW, Kaushal R, Keohane CA, et al. Center of Excellence for Patient Safety Research and Practice Terminology Training Manual.; 2005. p. 1–21.Google Scholar
- 33.Joint Commission. The Official "Do Not Use" List of Abbreviations. 2005. [cited 2010. April 9, 2010.]; Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/patientsafety/donotuselist
- 35.Abramson EL, Patel V, Malhotra S. et al. Physician Experiences Prescribing Using a Locally Developed versus Commercial Electronic Health Record. 2011;Under preparation.Google Scholar
- 39.Taylor LK, Kawasumi Y, Bartlett G, et al. Inappropriate prescribing practices: the challenge and opportunity for patient safety. Healthc Q. 2005;8 Spec No:81–5.Google Scholar
- 44.Bell DS, Marken RS, Meili RC, et al. Recommendations for comparing electronic prescribing systems: results of an expert consensus process. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-305–17.Google Scholar