Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 661–667

Projected Survival Gains from Revising State Laws Requiring Written Opt-in Consent for HIV Testing

  • Michael D. April
  • John J. Chiosi
  • A. David Paltiel
  • Paul E. Sax
  • Rochelle P. Walensky
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV testing in all settings unless patients refuse (opt-out consent), many state laws require written opt-in consent.

Objective

To quantify potential survival gains from passing state laws streamlining HIV testing consent.

Design

We retrieved surveillance data to estimate the current annual HIV diagnosis rate in states with laws requiring written opt-in consent (19.3%). Published data informed the effect of removing that requirement on diagnosis rate (48.5% increase). These parameters then served as input for a model-driven projection of survival based on consent method. Other inputs included undiagnosed HIV prevalence (0.101%); and annual HIV incidence (0.023%).

Patients

Hypothetical cohort of adults (>13 years) living in written opt-in states.

Measurements

Life years gained (LYG).

Results

In the base-case, of the 53,036,383 adult persons living in written opt-in states, 0.66% (350,040) will be infected with HIV. Due to earlier diagnosis, revised consent laws yield 1.5 LYG per HIV-infected person, corresponding to 537,399 LYG among this population. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that diagnosis rate increases of 24.8-72.3% result in 304,765–724,195 LYG. Net survival gains vanish if the proportion of HIV-infected persons refusing all testing in response to revised laws exceeds 18.2%.

Conclusions

The potential survival gains of increased testing are substantial, suggesting that state laws requiring opt-in HIV testing should be revised.

Key Words

HIV AIDS screening modeling survival analysis 

Supplementary material

11606_2011_1637_MOESM1_ESM.doc (132 kb)
APPENDIX TABLE A1State HIV testing data, 2006 (DOC 132 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Walensky RP, Paltiel AD, Losina E, et al. The survival benefits of AIDS treatment in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(1):11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2006. Vol 18. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2006report/pdf/2006SurveillanceReport.pdf.
  3. 3.
    District of Columbia DOH. District of Columbia HIV/AIDS epidemiology update, 2008. Washington, DC: District of Columbia Department of Health; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://doh.dc.gov/doh/lib/doh/pdf/dc_hiv-aids_2008_updatereport.pdf.
  4. 4.
    Campsmith ML, Rhodes PH, Hall HI, Green TA. Undiagnosed HIV prevalence among adults and adolescents in the United States at the end of 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(5):619–624.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008;300(5):520–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CDC. Persons tested for HIV--United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(31):845-849.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bayer R, Fairchild AL. Changing the paradigm for HIV testing–the end of exceptionalism. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):647–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wing C. Effects of written informed consent requirements on HIV testing rates: Evidence from a natural experiment. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(6):1087–1092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zetola NM, Grijalva CG, Gertler S, et al. Simplifying consent for HIV testing is associated with an increase in HIV testing and case detection in highest risk groups, San Francisco January 2003-June 2007. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(7):e2591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zetola NM, Klausner JD, Haller B, Nassos P, Katz MH. Association between rates of HIV testing and elimination of written consents in San Francisco. JAMA. 2007;297(10):1061–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1-17; quiz CE1-4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanley B, Fraser J, Cox NH. Uptake of HIV screening in genitourinary medicine after change to "opt-out" consent. BMJ. 2003;326(7400):1174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartlett JG, Branson BM, Fenton K, Hauschild BC, Miller V, Mayer KH. Opt-out testing for human immunodeficiency virus in the United States: progress and challenges. JAMA. 2008;300(8):945–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahajan AP, Stemple L, Shapiro MF, King JB, Cunningham WE. Consistency of state statutes with the centers for disease control and prevention HIV testing recommendations for health care settings. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(4):263–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    When To Start Consortium, Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-free HIV-1-infected patients: A collaborative analysis of 18 HIV cohort studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9672):1352-1363Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freedberg KA, Losina E, Weinstein MC, et al. The cost effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):824–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freedberg KA, Scharfstein JA, Seage GR 3rd, et al. The cost-effectiveness of preventing AIDS-related opportunistic infections. JAMA. 1998;279(2):130–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paltiel AD, Weinstein MC, Kimmel AD, et al. Expanded screening for HIV in the United States–an analysis of cost-effectiveness. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(6):586–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paltiel AD, Walensky RP, Schackman BR, et al. Expanded HIV screening in the United States: Effect on clinical outcomes, HIV transmission, and costs. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(11):797–806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walensky RP, Weinstein MC, Kimmel AD, et al. Routine human immunodeficiency virus testing: An economic evaluation of current guidelines. Am J Med. 2005;118(3):292–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    CDC WONDER On-line Database. Population projections, United States, 2004-2030, by state, age and sex. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://wonder.cdc.gov/population-projections.html.
  22. 22.
    Mellors JW, Munoz A, Giorgi JV, et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(12):946–954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arias E. United States life tables, 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;54(14):1–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walensky RP, Goldie SJ, Sax PE, et al. Treatment for primary HIV infection: Projecting outcomes of immediate, interrupted, or delayed therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31(1):27–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DHHS Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Rockville: Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.
  26. 26.
    Kaplan JE, Benson C, Holmes KH, et al. Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: Recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV medicine association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58(RR-4):1–207. quiz CE1-4.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(3):251–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cole SR, Hernan MA, Robins JM, et al. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death using marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(7):687–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C, et al. Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures. AIDS. 2005;19(7):685–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C, et al. 96-week comparison of once-daily Atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily Lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures. AIDS. 2006;20(5):711–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grinsztejn B, Nguyen BY, Katlama C, et al. Safety and efficacy of the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir (MK-0518) in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant virus: A phase II randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9569):1261–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nelson M, Arasteh K, Clotet B, et al. Durable efficacy of enfuvirtide over 48 weeks in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in the T-20 versus optimized background regimen only 1 and 2 clinical trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40(4):404–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pozniak AL, Gallant JE, DeJesus E, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz versus fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive patients: Virologic, immunologic, and morphologic changes–a 96-week analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(5):535–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Girard PM, Landman R, Gaudebout C, et al. Dapsone-pyrimethamine compared with aerosolized pentamidine as primary prophylaxis against pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasmosis in HIV infection. the PRIO study group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(21):1514–1520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Havlir DV, Dube MP, Sattler FR, et al. Prophylaxis against disseminated mycobacterium avium complex with weekly azithromycin, daily rifabutin, or both. California collaborative treatment group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(6):392–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    El-Sadr WM, Murphy RL, Yurik TM, et al. Atovaquone compared with dapsone for the prevention of pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who cannot tolerate trimethoprim, sulfonamides, or both. Community program for clinical research on AIDS and the AIDS clinical trials group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(26):1889–1895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Benson CA, Williams PL, Cohn DL, et al. Clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination for primary prophylaxis of mycobacterium avium complex disease in patients with AIDS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The AIDS clinical trials group 196/Terry Beirn community programs for clinical research on AIDS 009 protocol team. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(4):1289–1297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ioannidis JP, Cappelleri JC, Skolnik PR, Lau J, Sacks HS. A meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and toxicity of pneumocystis carinii prophylactic regimens. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(2):177–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nightingale SD, Cameron DW, Gordin FM, et al. Two controlled trials of rifabutin prophylaxis against mycobacterium avium complex infection in AIDS. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(12):828–833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carr A, Tindall B, Brew BJ, et al. Low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for toxoplasmic encephalitis in patients with AIDS. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(2):106–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wright JC, Weinstein MC. Gains in life expectancy from medical interventions–standardizing data on outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(6):380–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bayer R. Public health policy and the AIDS epidemic. An end to HIV exceptionalism? N Engl J Med. 1991;324(21):1500–1504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Giordano TP, Gifford AL, White AC Jr, et al. Retention in care: A challenge to survival with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(11):1493–1499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    CDC. HIV prevalence estimates–United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(39):1073–1076.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. April
    • 1
    • 2
  • John J. Chiosi
    • 3
  • A. David Paltiel
    • 4
  • Paul E. Sax
    • 2
    • 5
  • Rochelle P. Walensky
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of General MedicineMGHBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Division of General MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Yale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  5. 5.Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of General MedicineBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  6. 6.Center for AIDS Research (CFAR)Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations